Gloom-defying shoppers from China are flocking to the luxury stores of London’s West End, outspending Arab royalty, replacing Russia’s departing super-rich and lifting spirits after nine months of recession.
Data from tax rebate companies suggest Chinese tourists are spending three to four times more than a year ago in London’s chic shopping districts.
On Bond Street, famous for its designer boutiques and jewelers such as De Beers and Graff, figures from firms that arrange sales tax refunds for tourists suggest Chinese shoppers are now overtaking big spenders from the Gulf states, Russia, the US and wealthy Nigerians.
“We are looking for good-quality branded stuff,” said Lillian Wang, a 28-year-old bank worker from Beijing on Oxford Street, one of London’s mainstream thoroughfares. “I’m not as crazy as others, buying a dozen Louis Vuittons [bags], but I’m sure they are a lot cheaper here than in Beijing.
“A cheaper pound has also helped,” she said.
Thanks to a US$585 billion stimulus package and record lending by the nation’s state-owned banks, China is likely to hit the government’s target of 8 percent growth this year, by far the fastest rate of any major economy.
This has offset a slump in export demand and sustained the rise in incomes that made Chinese shoppers, especially the well-heeled, a rich seam of profit for Europe’s luxury brands.
“Income growth — particularly the top end, also driven by wealth accumulation — remains robust in China,” said Linda Yueh, a fellow in economics at Oxford University.
WEAK POUND
“Thus, wealthy Chinese may find that the weak pound makes Britain an attractive place to shop,” she said.
Sterling has recovered from lows early this year against currencies such as the dollar and yuan, but is still far short of mid-2008 levels.
Britain has been in recession since the final quarter of last year, when GDP shrank at its fastest rate since 1980. A survey by the Confederation of British Industry showed retail sales fell more sharply than expected in August.
In this environment, tourists from China and other Far Eastern countries will have little impact on Britain’s economy as a whole, says Richard Perks of market research group Mintel.
“It’s going to have a big impact on some stores, and it might have a perceptible impact on London’s retail sales. But it is hardly going to be significant for the country as a whole,” he said.
Wang’s shopping bags reflect a difference in spending habits among Chinese visitors from other wealthy shoppers: besides a £900 (US$1,470) suit for her husband, she had a more modest £50 pair of shoes for herself.
As well as top labels, the Chinese are drawn to more prosaic items, and they are not as seduced by lifestyle offerings.
For example, top-end retailers have employed Mandarin-speaking sales staff to cope with the influx of Chinese customers but London’s chic hotels have yet to benefit, said Charles Wang of tour operator Travco.
“You still find that the majority of Chinese shoppers stay at four-star standard hotels in London, but at the same time easily spend thousands and thousands of pounds on brands like Louis Vuitton, Gucci, Armani and Burberry,” he said.
Anecdotal evidence also points to a strong Chinese taste for sports equipment and furniture.
Nonetheless, certain items seem to hold universal appeal, said Bruno Barba, spokesman for department store Selfridges.
“Chinese, Middle Eastern and Russian customers all share a love of the luxury accessory — whether handbags, fine jewelry or watches,” he said.
Jewelry demand in China, the world’s second-largest gold consumer, rose 6 percent in the second quarter of this year from a year earlier, against a 31 percent drop in India and a 9 percent decline in global demand for gold.
Barba said Chinese customers now rank among the five top-spending groups at Selfridges, regardless of the season.
CHAMPION SPENDERS
The trend is even more marked elsewhere.
Global Refund, which arranges sales tax refunds for tourists, reported a 164 percent rise in sales to Chinese customers on Bond Street in the first seven months of this year from a year ago. Spending by Russians fell 27 percent, although at £1,295, their average spending was still higher than the Chinese shoppers’ typical £972.
“In spite of the downturn, the growth in Chinese spending is a trend we expect to continue to the end of 2009,” Global Refund’s vice president of UK sales Nigel Dasler said. “Seventy percent of their tourism expenditure is on shopping.”
Similar figures from Premier Tax Free show sales for which it arranged tax rebates to Chinese shoppers soared to £3.9 million on Bond Street in the first seven months of this year from just under £1 million a year ago.
That outstripped the combined £3.1 million figure for visitors from the Gulf states of Kuwait, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates and eclipses other big spenders such as the US (£1.8 million) and Nigeria (£1.2 million).
Last year’s table-topper Russia dropped to £1.7 million from £1.9 million in the first seven months of last year.
The number of billionaires in Russia has shrunk by two-thirds over the last year after the downturn lopped more than 70 percent from the combined fortunes of the nation’s 100 richest people.
According to Travco, the fallout from the 2006 murder of Russian dissident Alexander Litvinenko in a London hotel has been compounded by tighter visa requirements and Russian media coverage of Britain’s swine flu outbreak.
“Some of my [Russian] tour operator clients have been calling and saying ‘we know there is little risk from swine flu but our customers are all convinced that if they come here they’re going to die,’” sales manager Beau Manby said.
What is not certain is whether Chinese visitors will, regardless of exchange rates, keep coming back in the same way as other perennial big spenders.
Visiting London is an annual tradition for many wealthy Gulf Arabs, including Kuwaiti journalist Muhammed Khaled. Drinking coffee on Edgware Road close to many of London’s best known stores, he said he has been coming to Britain for the past decade to shop and escape the searing summer heat.
“I just have to come here every year,” he says. “Kuwaitis absolutely adore London.”
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of