Sometimes people outside the US have views of US elections that are, at the least, different from those within and, more often, illuminating.
So it was this week with Kim Beazley, Australia’s onetime defense minister, deputy prime minister and leader of the Labor Party now in power under Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd. Beazley said that Senator John McCain, the Republican presidential candidate, and Senator Barack Obama, his Democratic opponent, might use similar words on US foreign policy but “the underlying premises and approaches might not be exactly the same.”
In an address at the East-West Center Beazley said that McCain’s view “is an extension in the new era of essentially the Cold War approach. That approach was about building structures to advance Western interests and contain potential military and ideological threats.”
In contrast, Beazley told a luncheon audience at the research and educational center in Honolulu, “Obama is the first presidential candidate free of intellectual involvement in that world [of the Cold War].”
Beazley, who spoke before Friday night’s McCain-Obama debate on foreign policy, suggested that Obama was problem-oriented, identifying an issue, then engaging partners to find a solution.
For Australia, long an ally of the US, the distinction was important, Beazley said.
“Australia wants the US to extend priority to engaging the challenges by what is undoubtedly the Asian century,” he said.
A McCain presidency would accept Australia for the ally it has been. An Obama presidency would require Australia to work harder to demonstrate its relevance to resolving problems.
Beazley, a jovial, outgoing politician who was careful not to take sides in the US election, said both candidates gave priority to the struggle with Islamic fundamentalist terror.
Moreover, “the new president will confront massive fiscal issues,” regardless of who is elected and that may require that budgets for defense capabilities be cut.
Beazley was in Honolulu for the Australian American Leadership Dialogue, an off-the-record gathering of political leaders, defense and foreign policy specialists, and scholars who advocate close relations between the two nations. He is slated to become chancellor of Australia National University in January.
“Both candidates have said things about the Australian relationship we couldn’t fault,” Beazley said.
In foreign policy objectives, he said, they “have reached toward the views being put forward by elder statesmen such as George Schultz, Henry Kissinger, William Perry and Senator [Sam] Nunn.”
Schultz and Kissinger were both Republican secretaries of state, Perry was a Democratic secretary of defense, and Nunn was a leading Democratic authority on defense.
Beazley contended, however, that US Secretary of Defense Robert Gates had recently set “a subtle new direction” in security posture that McCain or Obama would inherit as president.
“The strategic dynamic of the Asia-Pacific region is being driven by the ways in which the previously dominant power, the US, and the rising powers of China, India, and Japan are educating each other,” Beazley said.
The Australian said he was fascinated by Gates’s claim that the US has become a “resident power” in the western Pacific.
He quoted Gates as saying “there is sovereign American territory in the western Pacific from the Aleutian Islands all the way down to Guam,” the island 2,900km east of China, a potential rival of the US in that region.
Officers at the US Pacific Command’s headquarters in Honolulu said senior Chinese naval officers have told Admiral Timothy Keating, the Pacific Commander, that they planned to build aircraft carriers in the near future. When those warships are ready for sea duty, the Chinese said, perhaps the US should withdraw to the eastern Pacific while China patrolled the western Pacific.
Keating, the officers said, politely but firmly responded that the US would not retire from the western Pacific.
Beazley did little to conceal an Australian fear, one shared by most US allies in Asia and the Pacific, that the new administration in Washington would turn its back on them in favor of Europe and the Middle East.
“It behooves Australia,” Beazley said, “to devote particular intellectual effort to ensure that the increasing value of the alliance to its partner is not unnecessarily diminished.”
He took heart in that “McCain and Obama are men of the Pacific.”
Beazley noted that Obama was born in Hawaii and spent his childhood here and in Indonesia.
For McCain, “Hawaii was a staging point for the toughest conceivable crucible of an education in the region’s affairs as a fighter and prisoner of war in Vietnam.”
Richard Halloran is a writer based in Hawaii
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with