The border crossing
Dear Johnny,
I am a Canadian living in Taiwan and married to a Taiwanese. I am confused; maybe you can help me and a few other people.
Many years ago when I was studying geography I had heard of Formosa the “Beautiful Island.” I always wanted to come here. Then the name was changed to “Taiwan.” No problem.
I came here in December 2000 and indeed it is a beautiful island. As long as you look for the beauty it is there for all to behold.
Over the years that I have been here I keep hearing Taiwan; Chunghua; Chinese Taipei; Taipei, China; China Taiwan; Taiwan, Republic of China; People’s Republic of China … oh! Now I am confused.
My wife and I went to Canada in June to visit the east coast. We reached the border at a small crossing just west of a major crossing south of Montreal. I had crossed there before but this time it was different.
I was asked many questions, like why did I choose this place to cross the border? Well, my answer was that I had been here before and we were following a certain route that led us there.
But I did not realize one thing. My wife and two kids, being Taiwanese citizens, had to have an I-94. This was OK, he said he would see what he could do.
He issued the I-94 and we went on our merry way. The following day I noticed that on the I-94 where it says country of origin the following was typed: CHINA (TAIWAN).
Where is this place, “China Taiwan”?
I am talking about the US government here, not some small country that takes its orders from China.
Den
Johnny replies: There’s only two things that can be said about this incident, Den.
The first is that the US immigration authorities don’t care about matters as arcane as state sovereignty. They just do what they are told.
The second is that if you told the average Taiwanese this story, the standard response would be “But did you have a good holiday?”
Make no mistake, my friend. This is a time of self-preservation and resignation. The way I see it, a critical mass of frustration and privation will have to be reached before Taiwanese can demand of their new government the kind of patriotic backbone that the previous one tried to show.
I’m just trying to work out what the snapping point will be.
Right now it’s very hard to think what could possibly do it short of a Chinese missile barrage.
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of