There have been repeated calls for “sunshine legislation.” However, the draft organic statute for the anti-corruption administration of the Ministry of Justice (法務部廉政署組織條例) has been blocked 165 times in the legislature’s Procedure Committee, the draft amendment to the Public Officials Conflict of Interests Prevention Act (公職人員利益衝突迴避法) has been blocked 24 times and the draft amendment to the Legislators’ Conduct Act (立法委員行為法) has been stalled 15 times.
The legislature is charged with monitoring the government, and such sunshine bills are intended to monitor the legislature. It is regretful that the lawmakers have blocked such legislation.
Elected representatives are responsible for monitoring the government’s performance on behalf of the public, so they should act morally and exercise self-control. This has not been the case. Recent lobbying scandals that led to several lawmakers being indicted — and many narrowly escaping indictment — include the Chinese medicine bribery case, the dental association bribery case and the Rebar Group case.
Eight lawmakers were indicted in the Chinese medicine case although another 24 who received between NT$50,000 and NT$300,000 from herbal medicine dealers were not charged. All these lawmakers had improperly carried out their duties by amending the law for the benefit of a specific group.
Eight lawmakers were indicted for receiving anywhere from NT$500,000 (US$16,400) to more than NT$1 million from the Taiwan Dental Association in return for endorsing the Oral Healthcare Act (口腔健康法) in 2003. Thirty-three others were investigated but not charged because of insufficient evidence.
Twelve lawmakers have been accused of accepting NT$5.6 billion from fugitive tycoon Wang You-theng (王又曾), the founder of the Rebar Group.
Obviously, corruption among lawmakers is a serious problem and efforts must be made to eliminate a conflict of interests.
When Minister of Justice Wang Ching-feng (王清峰) took office on May 20, she vowed that corrupt public servants would be firmly dealt with. This approach should be institutionalized through comprehensive legislation so that civil servants will not be tempted by corruption. The justice ministry should push for the establishment of an anti-corruption administration, which has previously been proposed.
It was suggested that shortening lawmakers’ terms of office so they would not have so much time to promote their own self-interests would lessen the opportunity for corruption. However, legislators’ terms have been extended and their powers increased, which means that their attempts to get elected and re-elected and ensure their estimated “return on investment” is likely to promote vote buying.
But a key job of lawmakers is to monitor government performance, which requires impartiality. To avoid both vote buying and conflicts of interest among lawmakers, Taiwan should begin by shortening legislative terms.
To build a clean government, we have to reform the system. Otherwise, government-business collusion, reckless legislation and vote buying will persist.
Tseng Chao-chang is a lawyer.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past