There have been repeated calls for “sunshine legislation.” However, the draft organic statute for the anti-corruption administration of the Ministry of Justice (法務部廉政署組織條例) has been blocked 165 times in the legislature’s Procedure Committee, the draft amendment to the Public Officials Conflict of Interests Prevention Act (公職人員利益衝突迴避法) has been blocked 24 times and the draft amendment to the Legislators’ Conduct Act (立法委員行為法) has been stalled 15 times.
The legislature is charged with monitoring the government, and such sunshine bills are intended to monitor the legislature. It is regretful that the lawmakers have blocked such legislation.
Elected representatives are responsible for monitoring the government’s performance on behalf of the public, so they should act morally and exercise self-control. This has not been the case. Recent lobbying scandals that led to several lawmakers being indicted — and many narrowly escaping indictment — include the Chinese medicine bribery case, the dental association bribery case and the Rebar Group case.
Eight lawmakers were indicted in the Chinese medicine case although another 24 who received between NT$50,000 and NT$300,000 from herbal medicine dealers were not charged. All these lawmakers had improperly carried out their duties by amending the law for the benefit of a specific group.
Eight lawmakers were indicted for receiving anywhere from NT$500,000 (US$16,400) to more than NT$1 million from the Taiwan Dental Association in return for endorsing the Oral Healthcare Act (口腔健康法) in 2003. Thirty-three others were investigated but not charged because of insufficient evidence.
Twelve lawmakers have been accused of accepting NT$5.6 billion from fugitive tycoon Wang You-theng (王又曾), the founder of the Rebar Group.
Obviously, corruption among lawmakers is a serious problem and efforts must be made to eliminate a conflict of interests.
When Minister of Justice Wang Ching-feng (王清峰) took office on May 20, she vowed that corrupt public servants would be firmly dealt with. This approach should be institutionalized through comprehensive legislation so that civil servants will not be tempted by corruption. The justice ministry should push for the establishment of an anti-corruption administration, which has previously been proposed.
It was suggested that shortening lawmakers’ terms of office so they would not have so much time to promote their own self-interests would lessen the opportunity for corruption. However, legislators’ terms have been extended and their powers increased, which means that their attempts to get elected and re-elected and ensure their estimated “return on investment” is likely to promote vote buying.
But a key job of lawmakers is to monitor government performance, which requires impartiality. To avoid both vote buying and conflicts of interest among lawmakers, Taiwan should begin by shortening legislative terms.
To build a clean government, we have to reform the system. Otherwise, government-business collusion, reckless legislation and vote buying will persist.
Tseng Chao-chang is a lawyer.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of