The new Cabinet started work yesterday, almost one month to the day that the veneer of competence of former premier Liu Chao-shiuan’s (劉兆玄) Cabinet began to peel away in the face of the battering Taiwan suffered from Typhoon Morakot.
The reshuffle was not as comprehensive as many had hoped — with just 12 new faces among the Cabinet’s 38 members. However, nearly all those deemed to be responsible for the flawed response to Morakot — the premier, vice premier, Cabinet secretary-general, interior minister, defense minister, foreign minister and Council of Indigenous Peoples minister — are gone.
Several ministers whose performance has been anything but satisfactory, namely Minister of Justice Wang Ching-feng (王清峰), Environmental Protection Administration Minister Stephen Shen (沈世宏), Council of Agriculture Minister Chen Wu-hsiung (陳武雄) and Council of Labor Affairs Minister Jennifer Wang (王如玄), managed to hold on to their positions and must be relieved that the focus of the reshuffle was firmly fixed on culpability over Morakot.
Nevertheless, the aftermath of the disaster put the spotlight on Ma’s inability to gauge public opinion. Looking back, his failure to declare a state of emergency was a strategic error that led to a big loss of confidence in the president and his administration that it never recovered from. That, and the insensitivity shown by many top members of the former Cabinet following the flooding, made a reshuffle unavoidable.
Ma’s apparent lack of political nous was further highlighted by his reported intention to retain Liu, even in the face of the premier’s record low approval rating.
Ma came to power with promises of continuity in the Executive Yuan — his predecessor Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) had been criticized after going through six premiers in eight years -— but he has quickly learned that governing a country is unpredictable and that even the best laid plans go to waste.
A new Cabinet was the only way for Ma to salvage his slumping approval rating and begin to rehabilitate his image in the two years he has left before beginning his campaign for a second term.
This was the rationale behind Ma’s decision to ditch his favored tactic of installing academics and technocrats in senior positions in favor of figures with experience in local politics. Commentators have already christened the new Executive Yuan line-up an “election Cabinet” and there is no doubt Ma made these choices with one eye on 2012.
New Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) and his team have their work cut out if they are to help Ma achieve his re-election goal. Together with the mammoth task of post-Morakot reconstruction, the new Cabinet’s priority will be to get the economy back on track.
Voters and the opposition will not let Ma forget his promises of a second economic miracle, but with a self-created slump in tax revenues, soaring government debt and record unemployment, those promises seem an awful long way from materializing.
If the new Cabinet cannot turn things around, and quickly, then Ma’s hopes for a second four-year term may struggle to materialize.
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS