For many days, the Papua New Guinea diplomacy case involving former vice premier Chiou I-jen (邱義仁) has been at the center of media attention. The embezzlement of funds intended for aid in exchange for diplomatic relations clearly shows the flaws in the diplomatic system and the harsh reality that huge diplomatic investment is not cost-efficient. Government officials appear content to abuse authority and revel in diplomatic games outside the official framework.
Often, the excuse that diplomatic affairs are matters of national security is enough to hoodwink the public so that huge sums can avoid legislative supervision and a select group of officials can engage in dollar diplomacy through brokers.
The US has also practiced secret diplomacy. Former president Richard Nixon sent his national security advisor Henry Kissinger on a secret trip to Beijing in July 1971 to sell out Taiwan. In order to finance contras in Nicaragua, former president Ronald Reagan sold arms to Iran without the knowledge of the US Congress, resulting in a political crisis that almost led to his resignation. The secret diplomacy of the US occurs almost entirely on the fringes of the law and those involved try to avoid congressional or media scrutiny. There are many examples of how morals are compromised when there is a lack of oversight.
With Taiwan diplomatically isolated since it left the UN in 1971, the government seems to have caught a “diplomatic isolation-phobia.” Taiwan has followed the lead of the US, and on the way it succumbed to the delusion that it has to build diplomatic relations with as many countries as possible.
Every minister of foreign affairs has been pressed to build new diplomatic relations, regardless of whether the countries are large or small, rich or poor — even tiny islands. Relations are sought by all means necessary.
Such scrambling for diplomatic allies results from the misunderstanding that if Taiwan can establish diplomatic relations, then it has foreign relations, making it an independent country. The new government of president-elect Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) should concentrate not on increasing the number of diplomatic allies, but on breaking through the country’s “diplomatic isolation-phobia.”
In terms of real diplomatic benefits, the Buddhist Compassionate Relief Tzu Chi Foundation can win a lot more international respect than the Ministry of Foreign Affairs; the laptop computers made in Taiwan are more famous than the country itself and Taiwan’s agriculture and its small to middle-sized businesses attract more international attention than its foreign policy.
One can’t help but ask what Taiwan has to show for its many years of dollar diplomacy. The structural limitations to the country’s space in international relations are mostly caused by the fact that China is so much stronger than Taiwan. A framework of international power sets these limitations: Even with the help of a diplomatic deus ex machina, a change in the situation would be impossible. In any case, how can we expect the two greedy brokers called on by Chiou and former minister of foreign affairs James Huang (黃志芳) to change the existing structure of international political power?
The only things that the government needs to do are change the frame of mind with which it rules the country and cure itself of its “diplomatic isolation-phobia.” Since the difficulties of Taiwan’s international relations are not easy to solve, the government should turn its attention to domestic affairs. Every minister in the past has earnestly pledged to boost foreign relations, but rarely have they said they want to improve domestic affairs.
Are issues like dredging Taiwan’s rivers, maintaining sewer systems in cities, improving the living environment, rounding up fraud gangs, putting a stop to drug abuse, supporting farming villages and the agricultural industry, developing alternative energy resources and dealing with pollution all less pressing than international relations?
Chiou’s actions await judicial investigations. The Papua New Guinea case may well turn out to be only the tip of the iceberg — who knows how many fraudulent cases of secret dollar diplomacy will be exposed in the future? I hope that Chiou’s case will not only demonstrate the greed of diplomatic “brokers” and the difficulties inherent in foreign relations, but also provide an opportunity to reform.
Ma’s new government should rethink Taiwan’s misguided ideas on boosting foreign relations. Instead of thinking about becoming a major player in international relations, Taiwan should appreciate the value of being a small country on the rise. Large funds currently used for dollar diplomacy could be used to fund national construction instead. The country can look to Singapore — with its image of clean governance, order and dignity — and work to build itself into a democratic country free of corruption, rather than pursuing diplomatic relations at any cost.
Liao Kun-jung is dean of the Department of Political Science at National Chung Cheng University.
Translated by Anna Stiggelbout
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS