I'm disturbed by the advice offered in the pieces by Meggie Lu ("Girls and women told to watch out when taking trains," Feb. 5, page 2) and Dayal Nitai (Letters, Feb. 17, page 8), and especially that of Jennifer Wang (
Wang's advice -- "Protect your breasts and buttocks with bags, backpacks or your arms" -- is incomprehensible. So women would be exposing some parts of their bodies if they fail to heed this advice? Does she mean pregnant women as well?
One can only image the number of women succumbing to heat stroke or heat exhaustion on a typical broiling, humid day because they were urged to protect "the same parts with an appropriate layer of clothing."
How many layers is appropriate? Wouldn't it be more efficient to outfit women with full body armor?
If beauty is in the eye of the beholder, who is to define "inviting" and "provocative"? Wearing "less inviting or provocative attire, whether subtly or grossly provocative, in public places" is denying the right of freedom of expression.
Wang was quoted as saying: "To minimize chances of being victimized, girls and women are advised to avoid traveling alone or boarding empty trains or buses late at night."
So women should stay clear of nursing or other jobs that require night or graveyard shifts. Attending night schools or working in factories would also be out of reach.
There are many ways to protect people from fear and sex crimes. These include:
One, harsher punishments for sexual predators.
Two, installing security cameras on trains and buses, at bus stops and train stations and ensuring that streets, trains, buses and train stations are well lit, especially in remote areas.
Three, encourage Good Samaritan behavior.
Four, treat women with the same respect and dignity that men enjoy.
Empower women, don't silence them.
Shao Lin
Kaohsiung
Taiwan aims to elevate its strategic position in supply chains by becoming an artificial intelligence (AI) hub for Nvidia Corp, providing everything from advanced chips and components to servers, in an attempt to edge out its closest rival in the region, South Korea. Taiwan’s importance in the AI ecosystem was clearly reflected in three major announcements Nvidia made during this year’s Computex trade show in Taipei. First, the US company’s number of partners in Taiwan would surge to 122 this year, from 34 last year, according to a slide shown during CEO Jensen Huang’s (黃仁勳) keynote speech on Monday last week.
When China passed its “Anti-Secession” Law in 2005, much of the democratic world saw it as yet another sign of Beijing’s authoritarianism, its contempt for international law and its aggressive posture toward Taiwan. Rightly so — on the surface. However, this move, often dismissed as a uniquely Chinese form of legal intimidation, echoes a legal and historical precedent rooted not in authoritarian tradition, but in US constitutional history. The Chinese “Anti-Secession” Law, a domestic statute threatening the use of force should Taiwan formally declare independence, is widely interpreted as an emblem of the Chinese Communist Party’s disregard for international norms. Critics
Birth, aging, illness and death are inevitable parts of the human experience. Yet, living well does not necessarily mean dying well. For those who have a chronic illness or cancer, or are bedridden due to significant injuries or disabilities, the remainder of life can be a torment for themselves and a hardship for their caregivers. Even if they wish to end their life with dignity, they are not allowed to do so. Bih Liu-ing (畢柳鶯), former superintendent of Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, introduced the practice of Voluntary Stopping of Eating and Drinking as an alternative to assisted dying, which remains
President William Lai (賴清德) has rightly identified the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) as a hostile force; and yet, Taiwan’s response to domestic figures amplifying CCP propaganda remains largely insufficient. The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) recently confirmed that more than 20 Taiwanese entertainers, including high-profile figures such as Ouyang Nana (歐陽娜娜), are under investigation for reposting comments and images supporting People’s Liberation Army (PLA) drills and parroting Beijing’s unification messaging. If found in contravention of the law, they may be fined between NT$100,000 and NT$500,000. That is not a deterrent. It is a symbolic tax on betrayal — perhaps even a way for
RSS