With just six months left before the Olympics, the outcry from activists and observers over China's abandoned human rights promises would at last seem to be making an impression on Beijing.
Over the past week, China has released two high-profile prisoners. Yu Huafeng (
It is no coincidence that authorities would show a sudden change of heart in these two cases, reducing Yu and Ching's sentences by eight and two years respectively. China's failure to loosen the reins on the press, despite pledges to the International Olympic Committee in 2001, has received considerable attention from international media and drawn sharp criticism from governments and rights groups. The release of the two media workers at the Lunar New Year was a clear signal that the bad publicity is getting under Beijing's skin at a time when authorities are scrambling to perfect their veneer.
This is good news not only for Yu and Ching, but also for rights campaigners, as it confirms yet again that China is sensitive to how it is perceived abroad. While some countries with notorious human rights records -- such as Uzbekistan -- are unresponsive to pressure from foreign governments and organizations, Beijing is aching for worldwide admiration and recognition as a modern country and leader in the international community.
All the more reason to ratchet up the pressure.
Beijing generally responds to criticism by releasing a few well-known prisoners or announcing sweeping reforms that often do not materialize. With authorities more concerned than ever about meeting international expectations, voices abroad must make it clear that a few reduced sentences are minor improvements in the context of a nationwide crackdown on freedom of speech and increasing controls on the flow of information on the Internet. The international community must show Beijing it will not be distracted by these releases and they do not make up for broader injustices.
Last year, Reporters without Borders recorded 180 cases of foreign media workers being threatened or detained while covering sensitive subjects. In addition, over the past few months, authorities have repeatedly denied foreign journalists access to leading dissidents and their family members for interviews, despite claims that foreign journalists are now free to carry out work and research across the country without government interference. And the fact remains that the issues such dissidents represent are so strongly censored in China that most local reporters wouldn't dream of broaching them. For journalists interested in pushing the envelope, the more than 10-year prison terms given to Yu and his paper's managing editor, as well as the severity of the sentences handed down to dozens of other media workers, serve as a clear warning.
Beijing is perhaps just realizing that its broken pledges do not go unnoticed, but it has a long way to go before it fulfills them. The more than 80 Chinese cyber-dissidents and journalists in jail for their work eclipse the occasional high-profile release. Until Beijing respects the rights granted in its Constitution -- including freedom of speech and freedom of the press -- such improvements will remain token gestures in the face of its glaring insincerity.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath