IN APRIL, Don Imus, host of MSNBC's Imus in the Morning, referred to the Rutgers University women's basketball team, mostly comprised of black players, as "nappy-headed hos," sparking heated debate and denunciation. Although he later made a public apologies for his comments, civil rights leaders and women's groups still pressed the issue and sponsors withdrew their advertising from the show.
President of NBC News Steve Capus said there should not be any room for this sort of conversation and dialogue on the air, and that ending the show and dismissing Imus were the only decisions he could reach.
Even though Imus claimed that he was merely joking and apologized for his remarks, US society has clear racial and sexual discrimination boundaries that cannot be crossed.
By contrast, Taiwanese media pundits, politicians, government officials and high-level officials at the Ministry of Education have lately been using infuriating ethnically and sexually discriminatory language without any forthcoming apologies. Instead, they have been cheered on by their supporters. What kind of society has Taiwan become?
Racial, sexual and other kinds of discrimination are prevalent in all societies, posing a challenge to the battle for human rights.
All sorts of basic human rights were only attained at devastating cost. Even the US' establishment of a better situation for fundamental racial and sexual human rights only came after a long effort.
In the past, the Ku Klux Klan's persecution of blacks was often openly praised by white people. It was not until the 1970s that the civil rights movement gradually managed to establish the notion of racial equality in US society.
During this long journey, the focus was often not on the movement itself, but rather on the development of effective non-governmental supervisory and balancing forces.
Unless there is a substantial counterbalance to power, there will be an unimaginable amount of possibilities to abuse power. Certain individuals may be able to resist temptation, but it is impossible that all people will do so.
To prevent the abuse of power, the most important thing is to establish systemic supervision and counterbalances.
Without such counterbalancing forces, individual moral integrity alone cannot ensure basic human rights.
Any discourse will be able to win the support of some voters, but anyone making fundamental demands for justice in their pursuit of voter support will, in the end, be condemned by history.
Although Chiang Kai-shek's (蔣介石) dictatorial rule, the 228 Incident, the White Terror, political embezzlement, officials pursuing personal interests and benefits are all documented facts, the more important point is that Taiwanese society hasn't managed to develop and establish supervisory and counterbalancing mechanisms, and that is why such issues continue to emerge.
Today, we have enjoyed a peaceful transfer of power and the government stresses that Taiwan is a nation based on human rights and diversity, but still there is no counterbalancing mechanism.
Corruption continues as before and human rights violations are still praised.
Many talk about transitional justice and bringing the perpetrators of the 228 Incident and the White Terror to justice, but they don't realize that their methods remain the same and their call for human rights remains a mere slogan.
I am a sociologist, and sociology does not believe that the individual will can determine everything: We instead look to the power of social structures.
People are influenced by the collective.
Which past perpetrator didn't think he or she was sticking to their values and doing their best for the country?
I am not trying to justify their deeds, but only want to say that had we been in the same situation, we might not have behaved much better than they did.
This is both a matter of structure and of historical destiny. When blaming those who came before, one could often do to show some sympathy.
As the language of politicians has become increasingly aggressive, I seem to see the shadows of those who came before.
A wise old man once said that the lesson we can learn from history is that we are not willing to accept the lessons of history.
Although human rights parks are being opened and the square in front of the National Taiwan Democracy Memorial Hall has been named Liberty Square, I'm afraid that we still have a long way to go before human rights will be guaranteed.
Jai Ben-ray is dean of social sciences at Nanhua University in Chiayi County.
Translated by Ted Yang
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under