Motorists are really feeling the pinch. With global crude oil prices reaching more than US$90 per barrel last month and topping US$96 last week, fuel prices are being felt worldwide.
After price hikes on Friday, Formosa Petrochemical Corp's (FPC) and CPC Corp, Taiwan's (CPC) product prices are now more than NT$30 a liter.
This situation is not just a matter of how serious inflationary concerns will become, but is a reminder of why sufficient competition is badly needed in the nation's gasoline retail market.
So far this year, domestic gasoline and diesel oil prices have risen by 11.5 percent and 16 percent year-on-year after the state-run CPC raised prices 17 times and cut them 13 times.
According to a Citigroup forecast, an increase of US$10 per barrel in global crude oil prices could push Taiwan's consumer price index (CPI) growth rate up by 0.5 percentage points. At the same time, it would undercut the nation's private consumption growth rate by 0.6 percentage points and trim the economic growth rate by 0.2 percentage points.
Keeping in mind such potential consequences, it is understandable why the government would try hard to prevent CPC from significantly raising prices. The government can do so as long as the state-owned company can serve as an important tool to help stabilize commodity prices.
It is regretful, however, that surging fuel prices has also become a political debate ahead of next year's legislative and presidential elections, with politicians from both sides making a huge fuss over whether to shelve the floating pricing mechanism and freeze fuel prices.
But a key question is how long will the public accept the two refiners' price-fixing. CPC and FPC have allegedly colluded in a market that has basically become a duopoly since the withdrawal of ExxonMobil Corp from Taiwan in 2003.
When ExxonMobil joined the retail business through Esso Petroleum Taiwan in 2002, it provided brief but real competition. The government began to liberalize the retail market in 2000, allowing competition and imposing taxes on petroleum products. But the high tariffs on imported oil products and high security stockpiles required by the authorities led ExxonMobil to pull out of the market.
To break the dominance of CPC and FPC, the government and the legislature have to amend the Petroleum Management Law (
Democratic Progressive Party presidential candidate Frank Hsieh's (
The real question is whether the government and the legislature understand the CPC-FPC duopoly and are willing and able to construct a more competitive market?
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS