I may have a reputation as a hardened cynic, but believe me, I want to be able to see the good side of things. I want to see that glass half full.
The business world isn't making it easy, though.
I'm not just talking about the idiotic promotions of late, such as Mitsubishi sponsoring a one-day pedestrian area in downtown Taipei to showcase its latest models; Volvic organizing a biking event to increase environmental awareness and inspire Taiwanese to import bottled water from halfway across the globe; and McDonald's offering half-price patties to anyone in Japan who will promise to think about reducing their carbon dioxide emissions. These guys are getting smart at making people consume more in the name of consuming less.
Any day now IKEA will launch a buy-two-get-one-free shelf sale with 5 percent of proceeds going to rainforest conservation. But it'll take more than that to suck me in. I'm waiting to do my bit for the environment until my pharmacy offers discounts on Siberian tiger penis in return for pledges to the World Wildlife Fund.
I can't take any more of this newfound social conscience crap. I like companies and governments better when they're honest about not caring. That's why I was ecstatic to hear a candid statement by Indian Foreign Secretary and self-professed weasel Pranab Mukherjee via the British Broadcasting Corp on what his country should do about Myanmar: "We have strategic and economic interests to protect in Burma. It is up to the Burmese people to struggle for democracy."
Words worthy of a British commander circa Amritsar Massacre. India has learned a lot since then, I see. Along with China and Russia, it has been quick to point out that brutalizing pacifist monks really is an "internal affair" -- much like a neighbor beating his toddler is a "family matter."
And, Mukherjee figures, as long as someone's beating his kids, we might as well be the one selling him brass knuckles. No shame in saying it: Money makes the world go 'round.
So is the world of finance and economy made up of nothing more than creeps and cretins? Of course not: There's always the crooks.
Thankfully, in Taiwan we've got the finest white-collar-crime busters in the world. Well, maybe not, but what we lack in quality we make up in quantity.
Hence, sending 200 prosecutors to raid BenQ's offices isn't a problem, but keeping tabs on a few big-time embezzlers does seem to elude us -- even when they've already been convicted.
Now I'm not an expert on these issues, but I do wonder how many countries, after convicting and sentencing top white-collar criminals, let them out on bail before they serve their prison terms. What could possibly be more embarrassing than former bank president and senior Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) official Wang Yu-yun (
I'll tell you what: Finding out that police sent two letters to his home politely asking him to report to prison.
But even our prosecutors draw the line at two friendly reminders. After that they mean business. When the police finally went to Wang's house, they realized why he wasn't opening his mail. And he didn't leave a forwarding address.
It couldn't possibly get worse. Or could it? Last week -- just one month after Wang skipped town -- we found out that his cohort Huang Tsung-hung (
With this stunning police record, I suggest Rebar Emperor Wang You-theng (王又曾) come home to face the music. What is there to lose? Best-case scenario: An act of God acquits him. Worst-case scenario: He and his wife each get sentenced to 20 years in prison and hefty fines, get released on bail to go home and "tidy up affairs," and jump on a midnight "fishing trip" to Myanmar.
Well, okay, let's not get carried away. So a few people escaped. So what? We've got smaller fish to fry. Like the 79 co-defendants Wang You-thug left behind, including his spawn, who must be dealing with serious rejection issues over Daddy right now. That's going to take years of psychotherapy -- after they've been released from jail.
A word of advice to white-collar criminals in the making (free of charge from old Johnny, because you might want to save up for your legal fees). Remember this rule of thumb and you'll do fine: "The smaller the crime, the more jail time; the bigger the sin, the better chances you'll win."
But disappointing moral fiber is hardly endemic to Taiwan's corporate world, and neither are the Wang kids the only ones dealing with rejection issues.
After US President George W. Bush met the Dalai Lama last week, China seems to have thrown the governmental equivalent of a hissy fit.
When it began rerouting requests from Chinese IP addresses for Google, Yahoo and Microsoft's search engines to Baidu, Government Information Office Minister Shieh Jhy-wey (
Freedom of information? Now I'm certainly not one to disagree that the boys in Beijing care as much about freedom of speech as Dow Chemical (bearer of the Union Carbide torch) cares about that odd burning sensation in little Sanjeev's eyes. But let's be honest: Western Internet firms haven't exactly needed China's technological support to stem the flow of information.
Shieh was being just a little over-optimistic when he implied the Chinese would be losing anything by not being able to pull up a collection of precensored search results on the Web sites of Microsoft, Google or -- my personal favorite -- Yahoo (which should only be followed by an exclamation point if the word "sucks" appears between the two).
No, the only losers in this situation are the slighted firms. Yahoo, which narrowly outshines Microsoft in terms of repulsive behavior in China, must have felt a little betrayed. Spend all your time down at the Public Security Bureau turning tricks to turn a profit and this is the thanks you get?
Snubbed by Beijing and called to another US congressional hearing within a matter of days -- overall, Yahoo had a bad week, and I'm not ashamed to say I'm indulging in a little Schadenfreude on behalf of jailed journalist Shi Tao (師濤).
But in case all of this stewing over bad eggs has you down in the dumps, I'll leave you on a lighter note.
Let's wrap up this week with a bit of foreign insight into my beloved country's economy. Over the weekend the New York Times reported on the "exodus" of Taiwanese desperate to earn a buck across the Strait:
"Here in Taipei, the exodus shows up in frequently light traffic. A mixture of youths and the old share the capital's sidewalks, with few left in the age brackets in between because of the exodus."
Buy one exodus, get one free?
I'll let the readers judge for themselves, but I'm guessing this particular journalist had one of two sources: pharmacological psychedelics or KMT Legislator Su Chi (
Heard or read something particularly objectionable about Taiwan? Johnny wants to know: dearjohnny@taipeitimes.com is the place to reach me, with "Dear Johnny" in the subject line.
On May 7, 1971, Henry Kissinger planned his first, ultra-secret mission to China and pondered whether it would be better to meet his Chinese interlocutors “in Pakistan where the Pakistanis would tape the meeting — or in China where the Chinese would do the taping.” After a flicker of thought, he decided to have the Chinese do all the tape recording, translating and transcribing. Fortuitously, historians have several thousand pages of verbatim texts of Dr. Kissinger’s negotiations with his Chinese counterparts. Paradoxically, behind the scenes, Chinese stenographers prepared verbatim English language typescripts faster than they could translate and type them
More than 30 years ago when I immigrated to the US, applied for citizenship and took the 100-question civics test, the one part of the naturalization process that left the deepest impression on me was one question on the N-400 form, which asked: “Have you ever been a member of, involved in or in any way associated with any communist or totalitarian party anywhere in the world?” Answering “yes” could lead to the rejection of your application. Some people might try their luck and lie, but if exposed, the consequences could be much worse — a person could be fined,
Taiwan aims to elevate its strategic position in supply chains by becoming an artificial intelligence (AI) hub for Nvidia Corp, providing everything from advanced chips and components to servers, in an attempt to edge out its closest rival in the region, South Korea. Taiwan’s importance in the AI ecosystem was clearly reflected in three major announcements Nvidia made during this year’s Computex trade show in Taipei. First, the US company’s number of partners in Taiwan would surge to 122 this year, from 34 last year, according to a slide shown during CEO Jensen Huang’s (黃仁勳) keynote speech on Monday last week.
When China passed its “Anti-Secession” Law in 2005, much of the democratic world saw it as yet another sign of Beijing’s authoritarianism, its contempt for international law and its aggressive posture toward Taiwan. Rightly so — on the surface. However, this move, often dismissed as a uniquely Chinese form of legal intimidation, echoes a legal and historical precedent rooted not in authoritarian tradition, but in US constitutional history. The Chinese “Anti-Secession” Law, a domestic statute threatening the use of force should Taiwan formally declare independence, is widely interpreted as an emblem of the Chinese Communist Party’s disregard for international norms. Critics