Last week, Ang Lee's (
The reason? Too many key members of the production were not Taiwanese, which raises the interesting question of how films are defined by their "nationality."
It seems increasingly difficult today to define or determine "nationality," not just for people but also for cultural and commercial products.
Over the decades, the global film industry has mixed and matched talent, expertise, capital and artistic and commercial inspiration from around the world, a trend that is arguably accelerating, as suggested by Hollywood remakes of a series of Asian blockbusters such as The Killer, Ringu, The Grudge and Infernal Affairs. Such borrowing across the East-West line is not unprecedented: The Magnificent Seven was a successful 1960 remake of Akira Kurosawa's The Seven Samurai, for example.
Filmmakers in Asia have conversely borrowed talent and techniques from the West to enhance their filmmaking.
International participation and cooperation is here to stay. These are two of the most important factors in maintaining the quality of films, including in Hollywood, and replenishing pools of talent.
So, disqualifying a film from an award ceremony based on a percentage of less senior foreign crew members seems a little outdated -- if not indefensible. Intriguingly, the rules do not say what the percentages are.
Rule Fourteen for next year's Academy Awards states simply that: "The submitting country must certify that creative talent of that country exercised artistic control of the film," and that "The Academy will make the final determination in all questions of eligibility."
By refusing Lust, Caution a Taiwanese berth, the Academy is claiming that the Taiwanese director, writer and other Taiwanese members of the production crew -- and some of the film's financial backers -- did not exercise "artistic control" over the film. This might have been a more credible statement if the Academy had determined who did exercise this control and to which country these alleged people belonged.
But they did not, creating a situation in which any number of foreign films are ineligible for the Oscars because they are excessively multicultural and insufficiently "national."
Because there are no rules on this matter, we are left with the possibility of political or other interference with the nomination process, a problem that is by no means unique to this part of the Academy's duties.
Still, the fuss over this matter is of little import. Lee has enough Oscars to prove to people who take the Academy Awards seriously that he is a top filmmaker. And there is every likelihood that the film might not have survived the cut to the final five nominees, given that the US release of Lust, Caution has met with a substantial number of poor reviews.
If the Taiwanese government is going to take anything away from this minor fracas, it is this: There are Taiwanese filmmakers to back for an Oscar gong other than Ang Lee, a director of vision and brilliance who needs no further recognition.
The most troubling message coming out of Washington for Taipei is not any single statement but the cumulative effect of a series of signals suggesting that US President Donald Trump is rethinking Taiwan’s strategic value while viewing the US-China relationship through the lens of a transactional great-power bargain. The danger behind Trump’s new softness toward Beijing is a potential US-China bargain that undermines Taiwan’s core interests. During Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) recent state visit to Washington, Trump and Xi appeared to rewrite the history of World War II. In a Sept. 25 fact sheet on Xi’s visit, the White House said,
The official English name for Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator and Taipei mayoral candidate Puma Shen’s (沈伯洋) campaign is “the Taipei Current.” It comes from the Chinese term yangliu (洋流), a direct translation of which would be “ocean current,” using the last character of Shen’s name, yang (洋, “ocean”). The Chinese term is a reference to the 2018 campaign for Kaohsiung mayor that swept a hitherto marginal player within the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜), who is now legislative speaker, whose successful campaign then was termed the “Han Wave” (韓流). Shen’s usage of the Chinese term is intentional.
Early this month, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) held two large election campaign rallies in Taichung and New Taipei City on the same day. However, KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) was marginalized at the rallies. Cheng shouted herself hoarse campaigning onstage for the mayoral candidates, but neither candidate was onstage at the time. In the morning of that day, the KMT’s Taichung mayoral candidate, Deputy Legislative Speaker Johnny Chiang (江啟臣), entered the venue accompanied by Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜), Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) and New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜). That afternoon, the party’s New Taipei City
China’s revised National Defense Mobilization Law took effect on Oct. 1, allowing the government to mobilize civilians and redirect resources for military purposes, and ensures a rapid transition from peacetime to wartime. It has a wide scope of “national interests” pretexts, which would likely be used against Taiwan. The amendment incorporates Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) “Military-Civil Fusion” principle into law, and stipulates that once the state initiates national defense mobilization, “the people’s governments at or above the county level may expropriate and requisition civilian resources,” and “all organizations and individuals shall have the obligation to accept the lawful expropriation and
RSS