In your article "Ma reiterates vow to open cross-strait transport if elected" (page 3, Oct. 1), it is claimed that "China-bound investment is capped at 40 percent of a company's net worth."
This is just one instance of an oft-repeated mistake, if not an outright lie -- a blind repetition of a politically convenient and malicious simplification of the current laws regarding investment in China by Taiwanese companies.
First, it is hardly ever noted that this limit only applies to public companies. In Taiwan, where small and medium businesses form the majority of companies, this is a relatively small percentage.
Second, it is not true that investment is capped at 40 percent of a company's net worth -- only capital raised in Taiwan counts. Larger companies in Taiwan almost always have much more capital in financial markets such as the US and Hong Kong. The restriction does not apply to any of that capital. Nor does any restriction apply to profits made in China, which can be reinvested freely.
The Democratic Progressive Party has engaged in a policy of "opening, with exceptions" and few of the old restrictions remain. The exceptions, besides the obvious defense industry restrictions, are in semiconductor manufacturing and LCD panel manufacturing -- areas in which Taiwan has been and continues to be a strong player. It should also be noted that United Microelectronics Corp has attempted to illegally circumvent the remaining restrictions.
Its larger, more successful competitor, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co, has made no moves to invest in China, and founder Morris Chang said recently that debate over "opening" is a red-herring issue (假議題) taking attention away from the true keys to sustained economic competitiveness -- creativity and innovation.
The government should ease restrictions on setting up older-generation semiconductor plants in China, but this is one small step in a very broad policy of opening to China.
Taiwan's China-bound investment continues to be among the top of all foreign investors in China and two-way trade continues to climb to new heights.
I urge the Taipei Times not to mislead readers. Give them a more complete and balanced picture of this important issue.
James Lee
Hsinchu
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry