Will President Chen Shui-bian (
With the presidential and legislative elections around the corner, the smart thing for the president to do would be to accept the post, roll up his sleeves and get to work.
Regardless of who is party chairman, Chen is the one who has been calling the shots in the DPP. There are various reasons for this. Most obviously, Chen is the head of state, so it is natural that he should retain clout.
Aside from that, no matter how strong the criticism of his performance in office, Chen will always hold the special title of being the first president to lead the opposition DPP into the Presidential Office after the end of one-party rule.
That said, in light of the competition and lack of consensus within the DPP -- first over who should become the party's presidential nominee and then over the "normal country resolution" -- it is not surprising that most DPP members feel the need to "formalize" Chen's existing status as the one in charge by making him chairman. By putting Chen back in charge, they hope to cement party unity ahead of the elections.
The resignation of Yu Shyi-kun as chairman last week was intended to make a point. His term as chairman was almost finished, so it wasn't necessary for him to step down immediately.
Stepping down strengthens Yu's reputation as a strong advocate of independence and a champion of the deep-green cause. He will be remembered as the person who resigned as chairman in defense of a version of the "normal country resolution" that incorporated stronger rhetoric on the issue of the national title.
Yu has thus secured a segment of the DPP's voter base and staked out a direction for his future political moves.
For the DPP, the decision to reject the more progressive version of the resolution was a difficult one. It meant angering the more progressive segment of its voter base without necessarily winning over the support of any swing voters.
But the DPP must realize that, to moderates, the differences between the versions of the resolution were almost negligible. The approved version does not explicitly call for the national title to be changed to "Taiwan." But what else could "name rectification" mean?
Still, if the party had opted for Yu's version, all hope of winning over moderate voters would have been lost. The party found itself with a decision that would, no matter what they did, alienate voters.
But heated debate is a natural part of a democratic party. Without it, it would be difficult to consider all options and make the best decision. The next task for the DPP is to get its new chairman in place and prepare for a tough election.
An article on the Nature magazine Web site reports that 22 scientists last month wrote to the daily Dagens Nyheter criticizing Sweden’s no-lockdown response to COVID-19. However, evidence-based analysis shows that a lockdown is not a one-size-fits-all strategy and Sweden is showing the world a sustainable way for everybody to fearlessly live with the virus, which is an inevitable situation that everyone must face and accept for a while. The biggest myth about lockdowns is that they are the only solution when an epidemic worsens. A lockdown is a measure to cordon off a seriously affected area so that people in
On Monday, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) spoke during the opening ceremony of this year’s World Health Assembly (WHA). For the first time in the assembly’s history, attendees, including Xi, had to dial in virtually. Xi made no acknowledgement of the Chinese government’s role in causing the COVID-19 pandemic, nor was there any meaningful apology. Instead, he painted China as a benign force for good and a friend to all nations. Except Taiwan, of course. The address was a reheated version of the speech Xi gave at the 2017 World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. Xi again attempted to step into the
China’s prevention of Taiwan’s participation as an observer at the World Health Assembly (WHA), the WHO and other UN specialized institutions is misleading the world. China always asserts that UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 established the so-called “one China principle,” in which Taiwan is a province of China. This is fake information that is part of China’s grand external propaganda strategy. Resolution 2758 made clear that the People’s Republic of China (PRC) is the sole legitimate representative of China at the UN and its specialized institutions. However, there is not a single word related to Taiwan in the resolution, no mention of the