Will President Chen Shui-bian (
With the presidential and legislative elections around the corner, the smart thing for the president to do would be to accept the post, roll up his sleeves and get to work.
Regardless of who is party chairman, Chen is the one who has been calling the shots in the DPP. There are various reasons for this. Most obviously, Chen is the head of state, so it is natural that he should retain clout.
Aside from that, no matter how strong the criticism of his performance in office, Chen will always hold the special title of being the first president to lead the opposition DPP into the Presidential Office after the end of one-party rule.
That said, in light of the competition and lack of consensus within the DPP -- first over who should become the party's presidential nominee and then over the "normal country resolution" -- it is not surprising that most DPP members feel the need to "formalize" Chen's existing status as the one in charge by making him chairman. By putting Chen back in charge, they hope to cement party unity ahead of the elections.
The resignation of Yu Shyi-kun as chairman last week was intended to make a point. His term as chairman was almost finished, so it wasn't necessary for him to step down immediately.
Stepping down strengthens Yu's reputation as a strong advocate of independence and a champion of the deep-green cause. He will be remembered as the person who resigned as chairman in defense of a version of the "normal country resolution" that incorporated stronger rhetoric on the issue of the national title.
Yu has thus secured a segment of the DPP's voter base and staked out a direction for his future political moves.
For the DPP, the decision to reject the more progressive version of the resolution was a difficult one. It meant angering the more progressive segment of its voter base without necessarily winning over the support of any swing voters.
But the DPP must realize that, to moderates, the differences between the versions of the resolution were almost negligible. The approved version does not explicitly call for the national title to be changed to "Taiwan." But what else could "name rectification" mean?
Still, if the party had opted for Yu's version, all hope of winning over moderate voters would have been lost. The party found itself with a decision that would, no matter what they did, alienate voters.
But heated debate is a natural part of a democratic party. Without it, it would be difficult to consider all options and make the best decision. The next task for the DPP is to get its new chairman in place and prepare for a tough election.
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS