If the government wants to recruit skilled high-tech professionals to work in the science parks at Hsinchu and Tainan, it should upgrade the infrastructure of those two cities.
The Greater Hsinchu Region, for instance, desperately needs a mass rapid transit system in the form of light rail or a monorail. Every day there are massive traffic jams around the Hsinchu Science Park, and the few bridges that connect Hsinchu with the neighboring suburban city of Jhubei (竹北) are clogged with vehicles.
Hsinchu has only one true high-frequency bus route, which serves the city's main street, Guangfu Road. Additionally, Guangfu Road is extremely pedestrian unfriendly: Major portions of the road have no sidewalks, leaving pedestrians to fend for themselves against the high-density traffic. Residents are forced to use scooters as the most preferable means to navigate the city, contributing to undesirable carbon emissions.
While the High Speed Rail Hsinchu Station in Jhubei does have connecting buses, in many cases the time it takes for those buses to reach important areas of Hsinchu City actually defeats the purpose of taking the high-speed rail. It is faster to take a freeway bus from Taipei to important areas of Hsinchu than it is to take the high-speed rail and then transfer to a connecting bus.
Some may argue that it is too late to enhance Hsinchu's transportation infrastructure because of the high density of developed commercial and residential areas; however, further procrastination will only make the situation worse.
Allen Chang
Hsinchu
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers