Terry Gou (郭台銘), chief executive officer of Hon Hai Precision Corp, recently donated NT$15 billion (US$450 million) to National Taiwan University for the establishment of a state-of-the-art proton therapy center for cancer treatment.
Likewise, Formosa Plastics Group chairman Wang Yung-ching (
These two tycoons were both motivated because they lost close relatives to cancer, and they now hope that other people suffering from cancer can be treated with proton therapy.
To have two centers for proton therapy in a comparatively small country like Taiwan is a substantial legacy from the two men.
However, it is worth pausing and looking at these large donations again.
From a medical point of view, the causes of cancer are complicated. Apart from hereditary factors, research shows that most cancers are triggered because people are exposed to cancer-causing environmental factors. In medical terminology, these environmental factors are called carcinogens.
Carcinogens are all around us. Many things, from radioactive materials, chemicals in herbicides, insecticides and pesticides to heavy metals like mercury, cadmium and lead that are used in the high-tech industry, and hormone disrupting chemicals that are found in some plastic products, are known to be carcinogens.
The threats to public health brought about by these carcinogens in the environment are too numerous to mention. Such toxins, from the dioxin pollution caused by the Taiwan Alkali Industrial Corp (TAIC), and mercury and cadmium in Taoyuan to hormones in the environment in Hsiangshan Township (香山) in Hsinchu County, can enter the food chain, concentrate in certain organisms, make their way to the top of the food chain, and end up in the bodies of Taiwanese, who give priority to economic development over environmental protection.
It is no exaggeration to say that Taiwanese are living in a sea of carcinogens.
So when we take another look at the source of these almost NT$20 billion in donations for the development of cancer treatment facilities -- the Hsinchu Science-based Industrial Park and the Sixth Naphtha Cracker in Mailiao Township (麥寮) in Yunlin County -- we discover that the price that we have already paid in terms of damage to the environment and the danger of living in an environment awash with carcinogens is millions of times higher than the NT$20 billion in donations.
What's even stranger, is that it is the same organizations that are both producing carcinogens and investing in curing cancer.
This strange conflict of interest brings to mind Rachel Carson, the American pioneer of environmental protection.
In her most famous book Silent Spring, published in 1962, she writes about the connection between carcinogens and cancer.
She quotes Wilhelm Hueper of the National Cancer Institute, who was of the opinion that our world is full of carcinogens, and that concentrating our efforts on looking for ways to cure cancer is doomed to fail.
He believed that the carcinogens that remain in the environment will cause healthy people to get sick faster than sick people can be cured.
So in our battle against cancer, why don't we implement measures to prevent the disease?
Hueper said that curing cancer is more visible than preventing it, and successful stories of recovery make people feel happy and optimistic. Also, the honorarium in the field of curing cancer is higher.
But preventing cancer is more effective than trying to cure it. In the end, Carson points out that the carcinogens in the environment are put there by humans. She said they come into our environment for two reasons: one is because people want a better, more convenient life, and the other is because producing and selling chemical products has become part of our economy and our lives.
We can remove them from our environment if we really want to.
When Carson, suffering from terminal cancer herself, testified before the US Congress in 1963, it made people realize the dangers posed by the use of pesticides like DDT.
From that time on countries took increased measures to ban or restrict the use of these carcinogenic substances.
Although Carson died two years after the publication of Silent Spring, her warning is still heard around the world.
This year marks the 100th anniversary of Rachel Carson's birth. I hope Gou and Wang have the opportunity to read Silent Spring.
Then they might realize that the only effective safeguard for future generations is to take measures to prevent cancer and reduce the quantity of carcinogens in the nation's environment.
Allen Chen is an assistant research fellow in the Institute of Zoology at the Academia Sinica.
Translated by Anna Stiggelbout
A Chinese diplomat’s violent threat against Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi following her remarks on defending Taiwan marks a dangerous escalation in East Asian tensions, revealing Beijing’s growing intolerance for dissent and the fragility of regional diplomacy. Chinese Consul General in Osaka Xue Jian (薛劍) on Saturday posted a chilling message on X: “the dirty neck that sticks itself in must be cut off,” in reference to Takaichi’s remark to Japanese lawmakers that an attack on Taiwan could threaten Japan’s survival. The post, which was later deleted, was not an isolated outburst. Xue has also amplified other incendiary messages, including one suggesting
Chinese Consul General in Osaka Xue Jian (薛劍) on Saturday last week shared a news article on social media about Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s remarks on Taiwan, adding that “the dirty neck that sticks itself in must be cut off.” The previous day in the Japanese House of Representatives, Takaichi said that a Chinese attack on Taiwan could constitute “a situation threatening Japan’s survival,” a reference to a legal legal term introduced in 2015 that allows the prime minister to deploy the Japan Self-Defense Forces. The violent nature of Xue’s comments is notable in that it came from a diplomat,
Before 1945, the most widely spoken language in Taiwan was Tai-gi (also known as Taiwanese, Taiwanese Hokkien or Hoklo). However, due to almost a century of language repression policies, many Taiwanese believe that Tai-gi is at risk of disappearing. To understand this crisis, I interviewed academics and activists about Taiwan’s history of language repression, the major challenges of revitalizing Tai-gi and their policy recommendations. Although Taiwanese were pressured to speak Japanese when Taiwan became a Japanese colony in 1895, most managed to keep their heritage languages alive in their homes. However, starting in 1949, when the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) enacted martial law
“Si ambulat loquitur tetrissitatque sicut anas, anas est” is, in customary international law, the three-part test of anatine ambulation, articulation and tetrissitation. And it is essential to Taiwan’s existence. Apocryphally, it can be traced as far back as Suetonius (蘇埃托尼烏斯) in late first-century Rome. Alas, Suetonius was only talking about ducks (anas). But this self-evident principle was codified as a four-part test at the Montevideo Convention in 1934, to which the United States is a party. Article One: “The state as a person of international law should possess the following qualifications: a) a permanent population; b) a defined territory; c) government;
RSS