Terry Gou (郭台銘), chief executive officer of Hon Hai Precision Corp, recently donated NT$15 billion (US$450 million) to National Taiwan University for the establishment of a state-of-the-art proton therapy center for cancer treatment.
Likewise, Formosa Plastics Group chairman Wang Yung-ching (
These two tycoons were both motivated because they lost close relatives to cancer, and they now hope that other people suffering from cancer can be treated with proton therapy.
To have two centers for proton therapy in a comparatively small country like Taiwan is a substantial legacy from the two men.
However, it is worth pausing and looking at these large donations again.
From a medical point of view, the causes of cancer are complicated. Apart from hereditary factors, research shows that most cancers are triggered because people are exposed to cancer-causing environmental factors. In medical terminology, these environmental factors are called carcinogens.
Carcinogens are all around us. Many things, from radioactive materials, chemicals in herbicides, insecticides and pesticides to heavy metals like mercury, cadmium and lead that are used in the high-tech industry, and hormone disrupting chemicals that are found in some plastic products, are known to be carcinogens.
The threats to public health brought about by these carcinogens in the environment are too numerous to mention. Such toxins, from the dioxin pollution caused by the Taiwan Alkali Industrial Corp (TAIC), and mercury and cadmium in Taoyuan to hormones in the environment in Hsiangshan Township (香山) in Hsinchu County, can enter the food chain, concentrate in certain organisms, make their way to the top of the food chain, and end up in the bodies of Taiwanese, who give priority to economic development over environmental protection.
It is no exaggeration to say that Taiwanese are living in a sea of carcinogens.
So when we take another look at the source of these almost NT$20 billion in donations for the development of cancer treatment facilities -- the Hsinchu Science-based Industrial Park and the Sixth Naphtha Cracker in Mailiao Township (麥寮) in Yunlin County -- we discover that the price that we have already paid in terms of damage to the environment and the danger of living in an environment awash with carcinogens is millions of times higher than the NT$20 billion in donations.
What's even stranger, is that it is the same organizations that are both producing carcinogens and investing in curing cancer.
This strange conflict of interest brings to mind Rachel Carson, the American pioneer of environmental protection.
In her most famous book Silent Spring, published in 1962, she writes about the connection between carcinogens and cancer.
She quotes Wilhelm Hueper of the National Cancer Institute, who was of the opinion that our world is full of carcinogens, and that concentrating our efforts on looking for ways to cure cancer is doomed to fail.
He believed that the carcinogens that remain in the environment will cause healthy people to get sick faster than sick people can be cured.
So in our battle against cancer, why don't we implement measures to prevent the disease?
Hueper said that curing cancer is more visible than preventing it, and successful stories of recovery make people feel happy and optimistic. Also, the honorarium in the field of curing cancer is higher.
But preventing cancer is more effective than trying to cure it. In the end, Carson points out that the carcinogens in the environment are put there by humans. She said they come into our environment for two reasons: one is because people want a better, more convenient life, and the other is because producing and selling chemical products has become part of our economy and our lives.
We can remove them from our environment if we really want to.
When Carson, suffering from terminal cancer herself, testified before the US Congress in 1963, it made people realize the dangers posed by the use of pesticides like DDT.
From that time on countries took increased measures to ban or restrict the use of these carcinogenic substances.
Although Carson died two years after the publication of Silent Spring, her warning is still heard around the world.
This year marks the 100th anniversary of Rachel Carson's birth. I hope Gou and Wang have the opportunity to read Silent Spring.
Then they might realize that the only effective safeguard for future generations is to take measures to prevent cancer and reduce the quantity of carcinogens in the nation's environment.
Allen Chen is an assistant research fellow in the Institute of Zoology at the Academia Sinica.
Translated by Anna Stiggelbout
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.