Big shot captains of industry in South Korea who break the law have an ace in the hole: the leniency of their country's appeals court judges.
Two such tycoons -- Chung Mong-koo of Hyundai Motor Co and Kim Seung-youn of Hanwha Group -- within the past week stood before magistrates who suspended their prison terms for, respectively, embezzlement and assault.
In the most recent case on Tuesday, Hanwha's Kim, who runs a chemicals and finance conglomerate, had his 18-month jail term for organizing and taking part in a spectacular revenge beating earlier this year shelved largely as a result of a deterioration in his health.
And last week, Chung, who leads the world's sixth-largest automaker, listened in a packed Seoul courtroom to a judge suspend his three-year sentence, saying the 69-year-old is too vital to the country's economy to spend time in a prison cell.
Experts cited various reasons for the leniency, including the idea among South Korea's judiciary that the chance of a criminal recurrence by the offending executives is slim.
"Absolutely the judge will think there is no possibility they will commit the same crime again," said Hwang Ju-myung, co-founder of Seoul law firm Hwang Mok Park PC and a former judge himself.
In the case of Hyundai's Chung, South Korea's national interest trumped legal reasoning.
"I am also a citizen of the Republic of Korea," Presiding Judge Lee Jae-hong said in court. "I was unwilling to engage in a gamble that would put the nation's economy at risk."
Michael Breen, a longtime resident of South Korea and author of the book The Koreans, said it is hard for the chiefs of the country's economically dominant family run business empires, known as chaebol, to avoid illegal activity in a big business culture characterized by corruption.
"This is in a context where breaking the law is the norm," he said of wrongdoing by the business titans.
Kim's case drew wide attention as, rather than the usual corporate malfeasance, it was centered on headline-grabbing violence.
He was convicted in July of abducting and assaulting off-duty bar workers allegedly involved in an altercation with his son, threatening the victims with an electronic shock device and hitting one with a steel pipe.
Kim Deuk-hwan, the judge who handed down Tuesday's decision, condemned the crime, but cited Kim's health -- Hanwha officials say he has suffered from maladies including depression and insomnia since being jailed -- and the fact that he showed remorse.
But the judge also appeared to show some sympathy, telling the court that the executive "lost his sense of reason because of fatherly love after seeing his son's injuries."
Sparing chaebol chiefs from jail has a precedent.
In 2005, a court suspended a three-year prison term for accounting irregularities handed to Chey Tae-won, CEO and chairman of South Korea's leading oil refiner, SK Corp, now SK Energy.
Breen said the willingness of judges to show leniency can also be found in the idea that going through the humiliation of a trial and prison sentencing is probably punishment enough.
"The spirit of the law has been applied and the letter of the law doesn't need to be applied any further," he said.
Still, they have paid a price.
Both Chung and Kim, 55, were ordered to do community service and even though they escaped lengthy prison sentences, their convictions stand.
And Chung, convicted of embezzling the equivalent of more than US$100 million in company money to set up a slush fund, was told to follow through on a costly promise.
Last year he publicly vowed to donate 1 trillion won (US$1.1 billion) of his personal assets to society as the scandal over which he was eventually convicted was heating up.
Though Hyundai and Hanwha both welcomed the decisions, some in South Korea had bitter words for the country's judges.
"Instead of undoing injustice for the people, the judiciary simply patronizes the public," Hwang Sun, deputy spokesman of South Korea's Democratic Labor Party, said in a statement on his party's Web site.
"We knew that the judiciary was not fair to all, but these verdicts ... have surpassed the unimaginable," he wrote.
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
RSS