With Minister of Foreign Affairs James Huang (
Yet the trips have proceeded smoothly. Instead, this week it was the Holy See, Taiwan's sole European ally, that continued to provide lessons in anti-diplomacy by sending hostile signals to its own rivals: moderate Catholics, Muslims, Jews and, thanks to Pope Benedict's most recent broadside, Protestants and Orthodox Christians.
For all of its platitudes on peace, the Vatican is in a fighting mood. Such a shame, then, that it could not be more aggressive in combating genuine tyranny. One would have thought that failing states and dictators -- such as Zimbabwe and President Robert Mugabe -- might be more deserving of a papal campaign than the devout on the other side of the fence.
Apparently not.
Zimbabwe, a former economic success story, is close to collapse now that the government has sunk to the point of arresting shopowners who heed inflation. A lot of innocent lives are on the line. But few governments seem to be taking the situation seriously to the extent that they would act.
Among others, South African President Thabo Mbeki deserves contempt for giving years of solace to a sociopath who has torn his country apart. South Africa, for one, may yet rue the consequences of this moral outrage and tactical stupidity.
Indeed, the Zimbabwe debacle teaches us a number of lessons about this part of Africa. Perhaps the most fundamental is that obvious omens for the ruination of a country -- co-opting of the courts by the government, an unhinged military and police force, xenophobic economic policy, rigged elections -- can stare neighboring countries in the face for years with nary a complaint. Evicting whites from farms and other locations seemed at the time to be a political tactic to appeal to the moronic element and even to other governments; in retrospect, it seems to have been the only tactic available to a man who would prefer destroying his country to relinquishing power.
Second, Zimbabwe is another example of just how fanciful the idea of a United States of Africa is -- with or without the likes of Libyan leader Muammar Qaddafi at the helm.
Third is the culpability of the UN. This organization continues to shield tyrants such as Mugabe from meaningful pressure because of the pervasive influence of despotic regimes -- in this case, the presence of a primary Mugabe benefactor, China, on the UN Security Council. Only a few years ago we heard top UN officials sighing that more should have been done in Rwanda to save the lives of the victims of genocide. But those people's successors in today's UN bureaucracy are silent on Zimbabwe as it prepares to commit suicide.
Yet there is one courageous Catholic, Archbishop Pius Ncube, who has shown himself to have the stuff of heroes -- unlike his religious masters and most of the rest of the world's governments -- by putting his life on the line in calling for international intervention to remove Mugabe and his thugs from power.
If Taiwan can learn anything from this disgraceful saga and from such people, it is that commitment and honor offer hope and inspiration in the shadow of the worst oppression. Faced with violence and terror, the good, wise man speaks the truth and speaks firmly, while carefully preparing for the consequences.
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
The stocks of rare earth companies soared on Monday following news that the Trump administration had taken a 10 percent stake in Oklahoma mining and magnet company USA Rare Earth Inc. Such is the visible benefit enjoyed by the growing number of firms that count Uncle Sam as a shareholder. Yet recent events surrounding perhaps what is the most well-known state-picked champion, Intel Corp, exposed a major unseen cost of the federal government’s unprecedented intervention in private business: the distortion of capital markets that have underpinned US growth and innovation since its founding. Prior to Intel’s Jan. 22 call with analysts
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
International debate on Taiwan is obsessed with “invasion countdowns,” framing the cross-strait crisis as a matter of military timetables and political opportunity. However, the seismic political tremors surrounding Central Military Commission (CMC) vice chairman Zhang Youxia (張又俠) suggested that Washington and Taipei are watching the wrong clock. Beijing is constrained not by a lack of capability, but by an acute fear of regime-threatening military failure. The reported sidelining of Zhang — a combat veteran in a largely unbloodied force and long-time loyalist of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — followed a year of purges within the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA)
RSS