US President George W. Bush's decision to commute the sentence of Lewis Libby Jr. was the act of a liberated man -- a leader who knows that, with 18 months left in the Oval Office and only a dwindling band of conservatives still behind him, he might as well do what he wants.
The decision is a sharp departure for Bush. In determining whether to invoke his powers of clemency, the president typically relies on advice from lawyers at the Department of Justice.
But the Libby case, featuring a loyal aide to Vice President Dick Cheney who was the architect and chief defender of the administration's most controversial foreign policy decision, the war in Iraq, was not just any clemency case. It came to symbolize an unpopular war and the administration's penchant for secrecy.
Even as he publicly declined to comment on the case, Bush had privately told his aides that he believed Libby's sentence, to 30 months in prison, was too harsh.
"I think he sincerely believed that Scooter was not shown proper justice," said Charlie Black, a Republican strategist close to the administration.
"We can get into the whole definition of justice versus mercy, but the point is the president didn't say justice wasn't done, he just didn't think the sentence was fair and therefore he showed mercy," Black said.
Bush is not a man to dole out pardons lightly, and in offering a commutation -- which still left Libby with a US$250,000 fine -- rather than a pardon, he chose not to use his constitutional powers of clemency to offer Libby official forgiveness.
The decision was closely held; only a few aides knew. The commutation seemed to catch Justice Department officials, and even some of Bush's closest aides, off guard. At the Justice Department, several senior officials were on their way out of the building shortly before 6pm when news flashed on their BlackBerries.
They were floored.
At the White House, press secretary Tony Snow said he did not know who had been consulted, or how the decision had been reached. Asked if Fred Fielding, the White House counsel, had been advising Bush on the matter, Snow said: "My guess is Fred did, but I'm guessing with you right now."
Libby had important allies in the White House.
The president's new counselor, Ed Gillespie, who started at the White House just four days ago, played a role in Libby's legal defense fund. Asked if he had spoken to Bush about Libby, Gillespie said, "I'm not going to go into any internal discussions."
One big question is what role, if any, Cheney played. Libby and Cheney are extremely close -- they often rode to work together before Libby's indictment forced him to resign as Cheney's chief of staff in October 2005 -- and aides said the vice president viewed Libby's conviction as a tragedy.
Bush came at the decision a weakened leader, with his public approval ratings at historic lows for any president, his domestic agenda faltering on Capitol Hill and his aides facing subpoenas from the Democrats who control Congress. Those circumstances offered him a certain amount of freedom; as Black said, "He knows he's going to get hammered no matter what he does."
Indeed, to administration critics, the commutation was a subversion of justice, an act of hypocrisy by a president who once vowed that anyone in his administration who broke the law would "be taken care of."
Howard Dean, the chairman of the Democratic Party, called it a "get-out-of-jail-free card."
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi called it "a betrayal of trust of the American people."
But to the conservative believers who make up Bush's political base, the Libby case was a test of the president's political will. In the end, although he did not go so far as to pardon Libby, Bush apparently decided that it was a test he did not want to fail.
"It became an issue of character and courage, really," said William Kristol, the editor of the Weekly Standard, who had argued in his magazine that if Bush was not going to pardon Libby, at least he should commute his sentence.
"I certainly think Bush did the right thing, and I think he did something important for his presidency. I think conservatives would have lost respect for Bush if he had not commuted Libby's sentence,"Kristol said.
Even as Libby's defenders lobbied the White House intensely for a pardon, the deliberations were closely held. In fact, Bush reached the decision only on Monday, hours after a federal court ruled that Libby could not remain free while his case was on appeal.
The decision was announced by the White House in a formal statement, just after Bush had returned from Kennebunkport, Maine, where he spent the weekend meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin. In the announcement, Bush said he had carefully weighed the arguments of Libby's critics and defenders.
"I respect the jury's verdict," he said. "But I have concluded that the prison sentence given to Mr. Libby is excessive."
From the outset, Bush tried to keep his distance from the Libby case, which grew out of the investigation into who leaked the name of a CIA officer, Valerie Wilson. He declined to talk about it, and until Monday had insisted that he would let the legal process run its course before considering a pardon.
Aides said the judge in the case, Reggie Walton of the US District Court, pushed Bush into a decision when he ordered Libby to begin serving his time -- a decision upheld on Monday by a three-judge panel.
So, unlike predecessors, including his father, who used their powers of clemency as they were leaving office, Bush was forced to act now. He has 18 months left to absorb the political risks, and benefits, of his decision.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.