Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou (
The first mistake was to believe that Wang was resentful following his losses to Ma in the KMT chairmanship election and the presidential primary. The main reason, however, is probably that Vice President Annette Lu's (
Some people have suggested that if Wang were to become vice president, he should be put in charge of interior affairs. These people have said all that would be needed for this to happen would be the president's authorization. But Taiwan does not have a full presidential system. The premier sits between the president and the Cabinet, and the president is criticized if he interferes with Cabinet affairs. Imagine the criticism if a vice president were to get involved in Cabinet interests. Wang is smart enough to understand this.
US President George W. Bush's delegation of defense and diplomatic affairs to Vice President Dick Cheney was based on long-term trust. Is there any such long-term trust between Ma and Wang?
Some may think that the vice presidency would be a promotion and offer Wang an opportunity, so they have pushed Wang to team up with Ma. This might be favorable to the KMT's presidential campaign and to the two men themselves, but it does not take Wang's wishes into consideration.
The KMT's second mistake was to believe the ethnic issue is crucial to Ma's winning the presidency. Both Ma and Wang appear to believe this. In the authoritarian era, the KMT's ethnic discrimination did cause social conflict, but following Taiwan's democratization over the past 15 years, the focus of social conflict has shifted from ethnicity to the unification issue, although the ethnic issue still requires cautious handling.
It is because the ethnic issue is no longer the major problem that Ma defeated Wang in the speaker's hometown of Kaohsiung in the KMT's chairmanship election.
Today, support for independence has risen to 55 percent, while support for unification has fallen to 30 percent. The trend implies that pro-independence sentiment will continue to grow at the expense of support for unification. Although the KMT needs to take care of the ethnic issue internally, the major external issue is its stance on the unification issue.
Obviously, some inside the KMT have discovered this. These people have proposed that Taiwan, rather than China, be made the party's priority and that the call for unification in the party charter be rephrased. Party diehards, however, know that "unification" remains their biggest bargaining chip for internal power and they have tried to shift the focus back from unification to ethnicity. By showing their respect for Wang, they are trying to exchange concessions on the ethnic issue for more room on the unification issue.
The hype for a Ma-Wang ticket was built on misjudgments of both Wang and the political situation. It is not worth spending more time on.
What does deserve our attention is that once the KMT amends its party charter, Taiwan's political situation will be profoundly changed.
Whether this change will be completed by the KMT's National Assembly on June 24 is uncertain, but the pan-green camp must not take the situation lightly but rather face it head on.
Lin Cho-shui is a former Democratic Progressive Party legislator.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS