After six years in the Oval Office, US President George W. Bush may have found his inner Teddy Roosevelt.
At a time when his policies on global warming are under intense scrutiny from environmentalists, Bush this week cloaked himself in another environmental issue: conservation. He used his budget, and his bully pulpit, to announce a 10-year, US$1 billion commitment in taxpayer money to enhance national parks, which have been limping along with limited funds.
Most environmentalists would not use the names George W. Bush and Theodore Roosevelt in the same sentence, unless making an invidious comparison. Roosevelt, of course, created a collection of national preserves that helped form the foundation of the current park system.
Bush, his detractors say, has let the national parks slide into decline -- until now.
"This is real," said Bill Wade, a former park superintendent and persistent critic of the administration's policies on parks. "There's a lot more focus in this budget for the operational funding that parks need."
The turnaround came at the urging of Dirk Kempthorne, the former Idaho governor who is Bush's new secretary of the interior. Two years ago, when Kempthorne was still governor, he and his wife spent two days with the president and Laura Bush, fishing, hiking and cycling in the Idaho outdoors.
"I saw up close and personal what the outdoors meant to this couple," the secretary said in an interview on Wednesday.
Once he became interior secretary, he said, he told the president that the 90th anniversary of the parks system last year should prompt planning for the centennial.
Kempthorne recalled saying: "Let's not just light a candle for the one day of the 90th. The centennial needs to be spectacular."
Last Wednesday, the two men and Laura Bush traveled to Shenandoah National Park, 120km west of Washington, to talk to private supporters of the parks about the new twist in their initiative: a challenge to the private sector to raise an additional US$1 billion for park enhancement, which the government would match dollar for dollar for a maximum US$3 billion at the end of 10 years.
With attendance at national parks declining, recreation companies said the initiative makes business sense.
"It's good business and it's good policy," said Gary Kiedaisch, president and chief executive of the Coleman Co, a leading manufacturer of camping equipment.
In an interview after appearing with Bush last Wednesday, he said his company had not "put actual hard dollars down" but would support the initiative.
The initiative comes less than a year after Bush offered another gift to environmentalists, by creating a marine reserve in the Northwest Hawaiian Islands.
"We're quite enthusiastic about it," said Gene Sykes, chairman of the board of trustees of the National Parks Conservation Association, who participated in Wednesday's event.
That enthusiasm, however, has yet to infect critics of Bush's environmental record. Despite the praise for its effort on parks, the administration found itself on the defensive on Wednesday -- so much so that the White House felt compelled to issue an "open letter on the president's position on climate change."
In the letter, Bush's top science and environmental advisers challenged news media reports that suggest the president's concern about climate change is new.
"Beginning in June 2001," they wrote, "President Bush has consistently acknowledged climate change is occurring and humans are contributing to the problem."
The letter cited a June 2001 statement in which Bush quoted the National Academy of Sciences saying an increase in the earth's temperature was "due in large part to human activity." But it failed to finish the quotation, in which the president went on to say it was unclear how much "natural fluctuations in climate" played a role, whether further climate change was inevitable and what, if anything, could be done about it.
The issue came up at the daily press briefing, where Tony Snow, the White House press secretary, insisted there was nothing new, either about the president's commitment to parks or recognition of global warming.
"There's been a lot of misreporting," he said. "Perhaps folks have not taken notice of the fact that this is an administration that's been keenly committed, both to environmentalism and conservationism from the start."
At the suggestion Bush was awakening to the environment, Snow said it was reporters who were waking up.
"The long national slumber," he said, "may be approaching an end."
But Philip Clapp, president of the National Environmental Trust, a group that has conducted assiduous and unfriendly analyses of the administration's environmental record, had a slightly different take.
"When presidents come to the end of their terms, they always look for great places to save," Clapp said, adding, "As for the rest of President Bush's environmental record, I'm still snoring."
One person who is not snoring is Kempthorne, who has a statue of Roosevelt in his office at the Interior Department, a constant reminder of the 26th president's commitment to conservation. At Shenandoah on Wednesday, he invoked a comparison between the Roosevelt and Bush.
Turning to his boss, he said, "I think Theodore Roosevelt would be very proud of you."
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under