The epic battle between pro-development and pro-environment forces over the fate of the proposed Suhua Freeway (
Wu wants the public to consider the viability of the lone road connection along the east coast where the freeway alignment would be. This existing road, the Suhua Highway (
The highway is also a perilous one to drive by any measure. Narrow, winding and with a steep fall on one side and the ever-present threat of falling rocks and landslides on the other, it is regularly closed after earthquakes in the area and during typhoons, when the mountainside sprouts temporary waterfalls along much of its length. Road deaths occur occasionally, often in spectacularly gruesome fashion.
The road at one time brought Hualien and Taitung counties, hemmed in by the Central Mountain Range, closer to the west coast. But passenger travel and some cargo these days has shifted to air and rail, leaving much of the road to local commuters and heavy vehicles servicing mining companies.
A freeway between Suao (
But there is also a powerful argument that opening up the east coast to a much higher volume of traffic from Ilan and points north will despoil much of the nation's environment that has managed to avoid the overpopulation and exploitation of the west coast, notwithstanding the damage already inflicted on east coast mountainsides by mining interests.
As the government deliberates over expense and environmental fallout, it is interesting that a senior bureaucrat is now ramping up pressure by warning that the humble Suhua Highway may be an unsustainable piece of infrastructure. Certainly, words to the effect of the road falling into the ocean because of erosion are likely to elicit a strong response from business interests that rely on the road. For them, a freeway is the only alternative.
Regardless of its expense, as long as the Suhua Highway stays open, pro-environment forces have an ace up their sleeves: The highway is there for those who need it, and the fact that it is not heavily used suggests that a freeway is not needed and that its construction would constitute an extraordinary waste of money -- in addition to damaging the area's exceptionally delicate environment.
But if bureaucrats are starting to frown on the coastal road and suggest that its days are numbered, then environmental activists have good reason to be very nervous.
The average Hualien and Taitung voter -- who is staunchly pro-blue-camp -- will likely become much more intimidating at the thought of there being no coastal connection to the north, even if he or she hardly ever uses it. This pressure is something that even a Democratic Progressive Party administration would find difficult to bear.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with