The epic battle between pro-development and pro-environment forces over the fate of the proposed Suhua Freeway (
Wu wants the public to consider the viability of the lone road connection along the east coast where the freeway alignment would be. This existing road, the Suhua Highway (
The highway is also a perilous one to drive by any measure. Narrow, winding and with a steep fall on one side and the ever-present threat of falling rocks and landslides on the other, it is regularly closed after earthquakes in the area and during typhoons, when the mountainside sprouts temporary waterfalls along much of its length. Road deaths occur occasionally, often in spectacularly gruesome fashion.
The road at one time brought Hualien and Taitung counties, hemmed in by the Central Mountain Range, closer to the west coast. But passenger travel and some cargo these days has shifted to air and rail, leaving much of the road to local commuters and heavy vehicles servicing mining companies.
A freeway between Suao (
But there is also a powerful argument that opening up the east coast to a much higher volume of traffic from Ilan and points north will despoil much of the nation's environment that has managed to avoid the overpopulation and exploitation of the west coast, notwithstanding the damage already inflicted on east coast mountainsides by mining interests.
As the government deliberates over expense and environmental fallout, it is interesting that a senior bureaucrat is now ramping up pressure by warning that the humble Suhua Highway may be an unsustainable piece of infrastructure. Certainly, words to the effect of the road falling into the ocean because of erosion are likely to elicit a strong response from business interests that rely on the road. For them, a freeway is the only alternative.
Regardless of its expense, as long as the Suhua Highway stays open, pro-environment forces have an ace up their sleeves: The highway is there for those who need it, and the fact that it is not heavily used suggests that a freeway is not needed and that its construction would constitute an extraordinary waste of money -- in addition to damaging the area's exceptionally delicate environment.
But if bureaucrats are starting to frown on the coastal road and suggest that its days are numbered, then environmental activists have good reason to be very nervous.
The average Hualien and Taitung voter -- who is staunchly pro-blue-camp -- will likely become much more intimidating at the thought of there being no coastal connection to the north, even if he or she hardly ever uses it. This pressure is something that even a Democratic Progressive Party administration would find difficult to bear.
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
RSS