On the evening of July 21, China's Xinhua News Agency announced that the People's Bank of China had completed its yuan exchange-rate reform, thus putting an end to two years of confusion over the matter. Avoiding the term "revaluation," however, China instead called it "reform."
Moving from a peg to the US dollar to a more flexible exchange rate linked to a basket of currencies is obviously a reform of sorts. As for the managed floating exchange-rate system, the daily trading price of the US dollar against the yuan in the inter-bank foreign exchange market will continue to be allowed to float within a band of 0.3 percent of the central parity published by the People's Bank of China after the previous trading day's close.
This means that China is still controlling its currency's exchange rate, and that there is still a long way to go before we get a reformed and freely-floating exchange rate.
The US dollar to yuan exchange rate set the evening of July 21 was a revaluation of 2.1 percent from the price at the close of the trading day.
One thing that was left out of China's announcement was that this decision was a result of pressure from the international community. The main pressure to revalue the yuan over the past two years has come from the US. It has not been an unreasonable demand, nor will the results only be negative for China.
But because the US made currency revaluation a demand, China reacted by taking an ideological approach and tried to bargain to gain some advantages. Throughout this process, China also took the opportunity to whip up nationalist sentiment.
As a result, Chinese officials, academics and experts have repeatedly claimed that the US' demand amounted to interference in China's domestic affairs and a violation of China's sovereignty.
Some have even said that the US was trying to harm China and block its rise, and that China would be forever doomed if it accepted the demand. Even foreign experts have said that such a reform would not bring any advantage to China or the world.
Following the revaluation, however, all such talk has been replaced by praise. It is understandable that academics and experts on China's payroll would dance to Beijing's tune, but that even foreign experts would do so just shows the efficiency of China's "united front" tactics and the power of business interests.
All this praise also included some voices calling it unexpected, among those a few Hong Kong newspapers who thus indirectly promoted Premier Wen Jiaobao's (
Serious problems in China's financial sector mean that a financial crisis could erupt at any time, and Beijing is worried that an appreciating yuan could set off such a crisis.
The response plan was revealed by Liu Mingkang (
The G8 summit earlier this month should have been an opportunity for the other states to put pressure on China, but the whole issue was avoided, making it obvious that there must have been a tacit agreement not to bring it up.
After the revaluation, Vice Premier Zeng Peiyan (
The reactions from countries around the world have been positive, although financial markets have been distorted as a result of a second round of bomb attacks in London.
The Chinese stock markets -- ?in particular Hong Kong's -- are performing well. Analysts predict that the yuan will appreciate, but argue that because the floating band is too narrow, it should be expanded to at least 10 percent. This has once again sparked nationalist sentiment in China.
The Hong Kong-based Communist Party mouth piece Wenwei Po (文匯報) ran an editorial saying that because Beijing desperately wants to avoid a vicious circle of appreciation, outsiders should not harbor any unrealistic expectations about further loosening. They fear a vicious circle after revaluing the currency by only 2 percent, but in the mid-1990s the yuan depreciated by 57 percent. If that isn't vicious, then what is?
If the US doesn't offer China any advantage, it will not be easy to get them to let the yuan appreciate further. The current revaluation should be considered a gift from China ahead of Hu's visit to the US in September. That visit was originally planned to come after a visit to the UN. The question now is whether, following China's meager gift, the US will now grant his trip the status of an official state visit.
Or maybe this "unexpected" revaluation will manage to set things right again following the uproar over a statement by Major General Zhu Chenghu (
Zhu said that China could "destroy a couple of hundred US cities" with nuclear weapons if the US attacked China in a conflict over Taiwan. At least the revaluation may serve to divert the media's attention from those remarks.
Regardless, China has joined the WTO, and if it wants to participate in the international community, it must make a transition toward floating its exchange rate.
This also means that China-based Taiwanese businesses must adapt to this situation, or at least start hedging their positions to avoid losses resulting from a fluctuating exchange rate.
A freely floating currency allowing both appreciation and depreciation is a "virtuous circle" and much better than worrying over a vicious circle of appreciation. Sooner or later, that is the road China will have to take, so why not do it sooner rather than later?
Paul Lin is a freelance writer based in New York
Translated by Perry Svensson
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past
President-elect William Lai (賴清德) is to accede to the presidency this month at a time when the international order is in its greatest flux in three decades. Lai must navigate the ship of state through the choppy waters of an assertive China that is refusing to play by the rules, challenging the territorial claims of multiple nations and increasing its pressure on Taiwan. It is widely held in democratic capitals that Taiwan is important to the maintenance and survival of the liberal international order. Taiwan is strategically located, hemming China’s People’s Liberation Army inside the first island chain, preventing it from