Former KMT secretary-general John Chang (章孝嚴) -- who left Taiwan's political arena in disgrace after an extra-marital affair came to light in December -- departed yesterday for China's Zhejiang Province, where he will visit the Chiang family's hometown of Fenghua.
One day before his departure, Chang went to pay homage at the tombs of his "father" and "grandfather" in Taoyuan County and prayed for a smooth journey back to his ancestral home.
Chang and his late twin brother Chang Hsiao-tzu (
Everyone in Taiwan knows this story. But Chiang did not dare to make the story public during his lifetime, because of the opposition of his wife, Faina. Instead, Chiang met frequently with the two brothers in private and asked General Wang Sheng (
After Chiang's death in 1988, his second son Chiang Hsiao-wu (
Chang used to say, "When Hsiao-wu was still around, he used to tell me, `Our friendship is not just like brothers (
Chiang's words have turned all the more bitter since his death. Chinese on both sides of the Taiwan Strait have always attached great importance to their ancestry. Paying homage to one's ancestors has always been a virtue -- a sign that one has not forgotten one's roots.
The Chang brothers' ancestry problem surfaced only after Chiang Hsiao-wu's death. But no one can help them be recognized as members of the Chiang family as long as Faina Chiang does not relent. Society can only extend their sympathy.
Public sympathy and special care from superiors smoothly propelled the Chang brothers to prominence in political and academic spheres -- perhaps a compensation for the hardships they endured during the first part of their lives.
Despite his journey to his ancestral home, Chang has said he is not changing his surname due to opposition from some members of the Chiang family. But Chang perhaps still believes that the trip will allow him to inherit part of the political legacy of the two Chiangs, or least a symbolic "brand name" image.
Whether the political legacy of the two Chiangs will be positive or negative in a democratized Taiwan is, however, open to question.
The enthusiastic welcome that Beijing authorities have extended to Chang is obviously a political ploy. If Chang inadvertently falls into Beijing's trap, his trip may very well turn out to be a negative factor when he runs for a legislative seat in Taipei City next year.
To win support from the Taiwanese people, Chiang Ching-kuo once said, "I am a Taiwanese myself, too." This was an indication of Chiang's political wisdom. While on his trip to his ancestral home, Chang should not forget that his political life belongs to this land and her people, just like his father's life did.
Chang wants to make a fresh start in the political arena and wash away the dirt from last year's scandal. His hard work and determination are admirable. However, Chang's true test will be how to leave behind the public perception that he has risen to prominence on the back of public sympathy -- and the favor and protection of his father -- and create a political orbit he can truly call his own.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath