Reconsider highway project
I am a professor of geography visiting Taiwan, and have read about the proposed construction of a freeway from Taipei to Hualien. The experience of communities in North America and Europe has been fairly consistent: the construction of such highways is invariably supported by powerful economic interests and leads to severe environmental degradation, the irretrievable loss of tourism and a flow of natural resources and youth from rural areas into cities.
I had the pleasure of visiting Hualien. In stark contrast to the concrete behemoth megalopolis that now extends from Taipei to Kaohsiung, Taiwan's east coast is an almost unspoiled paradise. It is to be hoped that progressive politicians will realize that the area's relative remoteness and natural beauty represent a vast reservoir of wealth that will sustain future generations.
By contrast, the freeway project, while bringing in some short-term employment and a few juicy contracts for road builders and their political cronies, will leave behind a legacy of environmental and cultural damage from which Hualien will be unlikely to recover.
Indeed, the only obvious benefactor of the construction is the Hualien Ocean Park and related hotel. The scholarly literature is quite clear about this as well.
Such "conventional mass tourism" sites rarely bring lasting local benefits, again benefiting only a few very wealthy investors, while bankrupting smaller family tourism operators and thereby driving down local wages.
I fervently hope that my next visit to this beautiful country is not marred by news that the Hualien freeway project has gone ahead despite the carefully considered protests of its opponents.
William Hipwell
South Korea
Aussie hypocrisy
Hopefully the Australian Foreign Minister Alexander Downer didn't get too much blood on his dress whilst waltzing with the Butchers of Beijing ("Australian minister plays down China's threat to Taiwan," Aug. 17, page 1). So Australia has now well and truly joined the ranks of the brown-nosers crawling to Beijing to try and fill their pockets.
His grasp of history, when urging the democratically-elected leader of another nation to "behave," appears to be non-existent. Would he have said the same to Mahatma Gandhi, Michael Collins, George Washington and a myriad of others who have walked the rocky road towards freedom and peace for their people?
Next time the troublemakers Down Under start their bleating for a Republic, perhaps the British should send in the gunboats to put them in their place -- rightfully under the rule of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second.
Michael Keeley
Tainan
Beijing's policy will backfire
China is desperate to stem Taiwan's further drift from its sphere of influence. Beijing has threatened Taiwanese businessmen in China because they supported President Chen Shui-bian (
Taiwanese companies have invested an estimated US$100 billion in China over the past decade alone. Indeed, Taiwanese businessmen are the principal movers and shakers in the Chinese economy. But these people know that China will not allow anything to stand in the way of the annexation of Taiwan so they keep their mouths shut.
When Taiwan's government recently held its annual meeting in Taiwan for China-based Taiwanese executives, Beijing was busy applying pressure to prevent them from attending the meeting.
The Chinese people are proud to have 5,000 years of history in which every government was the winner of a revolutionary war. When the government became corrupt, it was overthrown. The government and the people understood the game and how it was played. Now it is the 21st century and the world has become a "global village."
When the Soviet Union allowed the Berlin Wall to collapse, it disintegrated into many independent states. The Beijing government has allowed some degree of economic freedom. The Chinese people have begun to travel overseas. It is only a matter of time before these same people will ask for more freedom and democracy and will eventually threaten the existence of the Communist Party.
Threatening Taiwanese businessmen is certain to backfire and persuade foreign investors to cut back their investments in China. Economic prosperity in China will suffer.
My advice to the Beijing government is to embrace the values of freedom and peace like they have embraced capitalism.
Dr. Tien C. Cheng
Chair, Global Alliance for Democracy and Peace,
Chicago Chapter
Taiwan aims to elevate its strategic position in supply chains by becoming an artificial intelligence (AI) hub for Nvidia Corp, providing everything from advanced chips and components to servers, in an attempt to edge out its closest rival in the region, South Korea. Taiwan’s importance in the AI ecosystem was clearly reflected in three major announcements Nvidia made during this year’s Computex trade show in Taipei. First, the US company’s number of partners in Taiwan would surge to 122 this year, from 34 last year, according to a slide shown during CEO Jensen Huang’s (黃仁勳) keynote speech on Monday last week.
On May 7, 1971, Henry Kissinger planned his first, ultra-secret mission to China and pondered whether it would be better to meet his Chinese interlocutors “in Pakistan where the Pakistanis would tape the meeting — or in China where the Chinese would do the taping.” After a flicker of thought, he decided to have the Chinese do all the tape recording, translating and transcribing. Fortuitously, historians have several thousand pages of verbatim texts of Dr. Kissinger’s negotiations with his Chinese counterparts. Paradoxically, behind the scenes, Chinese stenographers prepared verbatim English language typescripts faster than they could translate and type them
More than 30 years ago when I immigrated to the US, applied for citizenship and took the 100-question civics test, the one part of the naturalization process that left the deepest impression on me was one question on the N-400 form, which asked: “Have you ever been a member of, involved in or in any way associated with any communist or totalitarian party anywhere in the world?” Answering “yes” could lead to the rejection of your application. Some people might try their luck and lie, but if exposed, the consequences could be much worse — a person could be fined,
When China passed its “Anti-Secession” Law in 2005, much of the democratic world saw it as yet another sign of Beijing’s authoritarianism, its contempt for international law and its aggressive posture toward Taiwan. Rightly so — on the surface. However, this move, often dismissed as a uniquely Chinese form of legal intimidation, echoes a legal and historical precedent rooted not in authoritarian tradition, but in US constitutional history. The Chinese “Anti-Secession” Law, a domestic statute threatening the use of force should Taiwan formally declare independence, is widely interpreted as an emblem of the Chinese Communist Party’s disregard for international norms. Critics
RSS