Let HK's majority speak
Speaking through the Xinhua news agency after last Thursday's massive show of public support for democracy in Hong Kong, the Chinese government claimed that a majority of Hong Kong's people wished to "play a genuinely constructive role to maintain stability and prosperity" ("HK activism is unharmonious: Chinese official," July 3, page 1).
Beijing implied this "majority" of Hong Kong residents opposed the peaceful expression of opinion by up to 530,000 of their fellow citizens. How, I wonder, have the Chinese leaders ascertained the size and political position of this "majority"? Certainly not through any open and fair electoral process.
So, I propose that the people of Hong Kong help determine the truth about what views they have and how many have them by holding, under the careful watch of nonpartisan international observers, a non-governmental referendum on issues of democracy in the territory.
Let all adult citizens of Hong Kong be given the opportunity to say yay or nay to a series of questions regarding their future, such as whether they should have universal suffrage and the right to directly elect their leaders and representatives. The results of such voting could go a long way toward informing Hong Kong residents, the Chinese government and the rest of the world about where the real majority lies, and might well give clearer meaning to the July 1 protest slogan that Beijing found so distasteful: "Return power to the people."
Matt Nicodemus
Taipei
The truth about tanning
This letter is in response to the article by David Leffell ("Pro-tecting our skin from the enemy in the sky," July 3, page 9).
Leffell's statement that "permits are rarely required to operate a tanning parlor" could not be further from the truth. In fact, 28 states in the US not only require a license for the operation of an indoor tanning facility, they also mandate that salons in those states adhere to strict operational procedures to ensure proper and moderate exposure to tanning devices.
Additionally, tanning salons in all states must abide by extensive rules and standards enforced by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Federal Trade Commission.
The statement "customers should eschew the bulbs and pursue the spray" tells me that Leffell is unaware that although UV tanning devices are actually regulated extensively at the federal, state and local levels, spray tanning systems using solutions containing DHA, a type of dye used in over-the-counter sunless tanning creams, may not be a prudent alternative.
The FDA has approved DHA for external use on the skin but not via a spray. According to the FDA's Linda Katz, the reason the creams have not been approved through the use of a spray is because "some of the products may get exposed to the eyes, to the nose, mucous membranes and may be inhaled."
As for tanning education, for the last 5 years I have offered an extensive training and certification course aimed at raising the knowledge and skills of tens of thousands of indoor tanning staff across the US and Canada.
I also co-ordinate and present seminars on topics that relate specifically to the facts and scientific aspects of indoor tanning.
My number-one priority is to promote the educational aspects of indoor tanning, thus enhancing the knowledge of salon owners and operators who can pass this knowledge on to the consumer. My goal is to teach sensible, moderate and responsible tanning while ad-hering to state and federal guidelines for indoor tanning. My program provides the most up-to-date information regarding UV radiation, exposure schedules, the science of tanning, state and federal regulations, the risks of overexposure and many other topics that relate to indoor tanning.
Rick Mattoon
Glendale, Arizona
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
RSS