The damage from degrading images of US soldiers abusing naked Iraqi prisoners will be indelible, incalculable and a priceless gift to Osama bin Laden, analysts said on Monday.
Anger and indignation rippled across the Arab world at the photos and the reaction was almost unanimous. What people saw, they said, was the true image of the occupation, debasement of an occupied people, contempt for Islam, sadism and racism.
Lebanon's top Shiite Muslim cleric, Ayatollah Mohammad Hussein Fadlallah, said that Washington will fail to whitewash its "abhorrent image in the Middle East" after the scandal.
ILLUSTRATION: YU SHA
"Fire rages in the hearts of these Americans and hatred spews from their mouths. What their hearts hide is even greater," Muslim Brotherhood leader Mohamed Mehdi Akef said.
"The pictures reinforce the sense of racism and decadence, of what Americans have done to American-Indians -- the cruelty, savagery and complete disrespect for human life," said Mohamed al-Sayed Said of Egypt's al-Ahram Center for Political Studies.
Arabs across the political spectrum feel whatever President George W. Bush's administration does to try to make amends will not erase a bitter and enduring legacy.
The images of uniformed women and male soldiers cheerfully brutalizing prisoners in the most humiliating manner will linger for decades.
"In Islam, sodomy is something that cannot be tolerated, sexual abuse is a gross assault, the gravest form of degradation and a violation of the Koran. There is nothing worse," said Abdel-Bari Atwan, editor of al-Quds Al Arabi daily.
"The Americans trampled on anything called human dignity. They are reviving the culture of slavery," he said.
Victory for bin Laden
No one is likely to rejoice more than bin Laden at the outrage and uproar caused by the images, with one chilling photo showing a female soldier dragging a naked man on a dog's leash.
These abuses, analysts say, will be seized on by the leader of al Qaeda as triumphant confirmation that America has launched a "crusade" in Iraq to destroy Muslim dignity and identity.
"This is the best recruiting campaign for bin Laden and al Qaeda," Atwan said. "Honestly, this by itself could instigate a holy war against the Americans."
"This will justify for Muslims the attacks against Americans and Westerners inside the Arab and Muslim world and outside," he said.
Pro-Western Arabs who placed faith in Washington and its stated intention to advance democracy in the Middle East feel betrayed and demoralized.
"Any human being if he has any humanity in him will be sad, outraged and depressed at these images," said Saudi scholar Sami Angawi. "It will add oil to the fire. Bin Laden will exploit it."
Arabs said the scandal made a mockery of yearly US reports on countries violating human rights and using torture.
The disturbing images, played over and over again on Arab satellite channels and splashed over newspapers, dealt a new blow to Washington not only politically but to its moral model of democracy in the eyes of Arabs and the world, analysts said.
Anger at Washington, long perceived as an ally of Israel and a backer of autocratic Arab rulers, reached a boiling point over the US war on Iraq, and Bush's endorsement of Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's plan to retain parts of the West Bank.
Official Arab silence
Bin Laden has called for holy war to end the "blatant US occupation", saying America has "utter contempt for Islam" and that the conflict is religious and between the West and Islam.
Adding to popular Arab outrage is the near uniform silence of their leaders, few of whom even alluded to the abuse at Abu Ghraib prison, notorious for torture under former Iraqi president Saddam Hussein.
Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Maher said Washington should punish those found guilty but President Hosni Mubarak has not mentioned the abuse. Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Saud al-Faisal said it was "the result of the occupation."
Analysts say this near-silence is unsurprising given Arab leaders' own record of torture of tens of thousands of their political dissidents from Egypt to Algeria.
"There is an Arab proverb that says: `If your house is made of glass you don't throw stones at others,'" said one Gulf commentator. "Arab leaders are not shocked, this is normal for what they themselves do to their people."
Stung by the photographs, Bush pledged to punish the soldiers and Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld offered his "deepest apology." The first of seven US soldiers charged faces a public court martial in Baghdad this month.
But many Arabs said anything short of a drastic shift in US policy and the sacking of Rumsfeld would not be enough to appease indignation, and even then there were no guarantees.
"When an official in Europe or the United States has an affair he will be forced to resign. Imagine with this indecent assault on Iraqis and Islam, nobody is resigning. Neither Bush nor Rumsfeld are being forced to resign," Atwan said.
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
RSS