Taiwan's representative to the US, Chen Chien-jen (
He is the most fortunate, but also the most unfortunate, representative to the US since the two countries severed diplomatic ties. He is fortunate because US President George W. Bush's ideology has created the best Taiwan-US relations. But he is unfortunate because President Chen Shui-bian's (
Standing on the front lines of diplomacy, Chen Chien-jen has a clear understanding of the cold wind blowing in Washington.
He is a career diplomat with an excellent educational and professional background. He is a man of good character and has a good way with people and a wide personal network. Add to this that he has many talents, and even though he might not be called the renaissance man of diplomacy, he can without feeling ashamed call himself half a renaissance man.
He is, however, no George Yeh (
Though Chen Chien-jen cannot compare to his two predecessors, he is not one to do whatever he is told.
But he has run into a president who likes to shoot his mouth off on impulse. As soon as Taipei starts a fire, he has to work hard in Washington to extinguish it.
Although Chen Chien-jen's contacts in Washington are quite good, he does not have the access to the White House that Yeh or Hu had, access that allowed them to immediately clarify misunderstandings or resolve crises.
His Washington friends may be sympathetic as they see his constant efforts at putting out fires, but his credibility suffers.
Anyone involved in diplomacy has heard the following metaphor: A president's relationship with the diplomatic system is like that of a conductor with his symphony orchestra. No matter how well the conductor plays the violin, he cannot play first chair violin or he will not hear the other instruments. As a result, the whole orchestra will lose its rhythm and direction.
The reason that Taiwan's diplomacy is a mess is that the conductor is playing first violin.
There is one almost religious rule in diplomacy -- politics must come to a halt at the water's edge of diplomacy.
But the president has tied foreign policy closely to domestic politics, and politics has therefore muddied the diplomatic waters.
A diplomat's worst nightmare is the nation's leader personalizing and politicizing diplomacy, placing it in the realm of ideology. This is what has now happened to Taiwan's diplomacy.
A diplomat's nightmare among nightmares is having the president go so far in his ideology that his reasons for doing things become unrelated to diplomatic reality, set foreign policy according to this ideology and let short-term political interests (particularly electoral interests) decide diplomatic activities.
This shows just how unfortunate Chen Chien-jen really is.
Taiwan's diplomacy is now a matter for domestic officials and not for diplomats. Foreign affairs officials such as Chen Chien-jen, and even foreign minister Eugene Chien (簡又新), no longer make up the core of decisionmakers.
Instead, the officials in the Presidential Office participate in decisionmaking at an earlier stage in the process, and to a greater extent.
The president and his associates cannot avoid responsibility for the sharp deterioration of the Taiwan-US relationship, and they have only complicated the difficult job that Chen Chien-jen and other diplomats must do.
Wang Chien-chuang is the president of The Journalist.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath