“This is a solution?” marveled Stanley Bing incredulously on business Web site TheStreet.com at the prospect of a new wave of bank consolidations. “Didn’t we see what happened to Citigroup and Bank of America? Aren’t both now being deconstructed due to unsuccessful, if not heedless, acquisitions? Haven’t empires from Rome to ITT fallen into rubble as a result of getting too big, too fast?”
Bing has a point. Most people assume that sorting out the banks is a technical and financial matter — deleveraging, rebuilding reserves and writing down toxic liabilities. But that’s just the half of it. What has been grossly neglected is that, even when that’s done, many banks face the mother of all challenges on the management front — making business sense of vast, sometimes shotgun, acquisitions carried out in the most hostile economic conditions of our lifetimes.
Consider: At the best of times, mergers are worse business, and harder to do, than managers think. One-third fail and 80 percent fail to live up to expectations. The financial brainboxes are no better at it than the plodders: A recent City of London poll on the worst banking mergers ever identified such turkeys as Citibank-Travellers, Credit Suisse-DLJ and Wachovia-Golden West — then put RBS-ABN Amro and Bank of America-Merrill Lynch, the ramifications of which are still to be fully felt, at the top.
“Value destruction in financial services isn’t new — we just can’t afford it any more,” says Dustin Seale, managing director of the Europe arm of Senn-Delaney Leadership, a consultancy specializing in corporate culture.
The risk, he fears, is that the perceived remedy makes ultimate success harder to achieve. Thus, while banking is moving toward being smaller, more focused and more conservative, the entities being cobbled together are bigger and more complex than ever. Banks were once too big to fail; are today’s mergers creating organizations that are too big to save?
Bank mergers are not just ordinarily difficult. The credit crunch capsized all the assumptions on which they were based. RBS’s Fred Goodwin had a good record of making acquisitions work, even expensive ones, but “Fred the Shred” is toast, and his merger rationale and style vaporized along with him.
His bank’s strategy of globalization no longer makes much sense, believes Andrew Campbell, director of the Ashridge Strategic Management Center and co-author of a book called Smarter Acquisitions. Lloyds-HBOS, now relabeled Lloyds Banking Group, is a more coherent unit focusing on the UK retail market, but the merger will not be smooth sailing; integrating the workforce and senior managers of a fierce rival, part of whose identity is bound up with the rivalry itself, never is.
The very success criteria on which the mergers were predicated, and on which the current leaders rose to the top, have reversed overnight.
The macho City of London (and Wall Street) culture of individual achievement and self-promotion has become the problem; but moving to a culture where words such as engagement, trust and self-determination can be heard without provoking gales of laughter is a monumental management task — made more monumental, says Ian Johnston, a Senn-Delaney partner, by the fact that the colossal bonuses that were used to paper over other cultural discontents are no longer available.
The sense that the world revolves around the banks has to yield to a humbler recognition of the need to serve customers and build relationships. Some banks will make wholesale changes in what they actually do (leadership, recruitment, reward) as well as what they say. Others will find it harder to get beyond spin. Yet, as Seale points out, those that do can contemplate an opportunity as enormous as the challenge.
Without exception, the big banks have been lamentable at dealing with retail customers. This is partly because their minds have been on sexier types of business, but much more because they have remained obstinately wedded to the cost-driven mass-production methods that render them brainless — and, incidentally, have taken General Motors and Chrysler to the brink of extinction.
The first major bank to use the opportunities of the merger round to renew itself by providing an honest, transparent and intelligent service to high-street customers will be greeted with tears of joy. OK, I exaggerate a bit, but renewing the link with customers is the best way for the banks both to make amends for the monstrous errors of the past few years and to proof themselves against foolishness.
As they consider how to avoid a new wave of merger-driven value annihilation, bank leaders can at least comfort themselves with this unexpected thought: For once, as Seale points out, “no one wants them to fail.”
FAST RELEASE: The council lauded the developer for completing model testing in only four days and releasing a commercial version for use by academia and industry The National Science and Technology Council (NSTC) yesterday released the latest artificial intelligence (AI) language model in traditional Chinese embedded with Taiwanese cultural values. The council launched the Trustworthy AI Dialogue Engine (TAIDE) program in April last year to develop and train traditional Chinese-language models based on LLaMA, the open-source AI language model released by Meta. The program aims to tackle the information bias that is often present in international large-scale language models and take Taiwanese culture and values into consideration, it said. Llama 3-TAIDE-LX-8B-Chat-Alpha1, released yesterday, is the latest large language model in traditional Chinese. It was trained based on Meta’s Llama-3-8B
STUMPED: KMT and TPP lawmakers approved a resolution to suspend the rate hike, which the government said was unavoidable in view of rising global energy costs The Ministry of Economic Affairs yesterday said it has a mandate to raise electricity prices as planned after the legislature passed a non-binding resolution along partisan lines to freeze rates. Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers proposed the resolution to suspend the price hike, which passed by a 59-50 vote. The Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) voted with the KMT. Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) of the KMT said the resolution is a mandate for the “immediate suspension of electricity price hikes” and for the Executive Yuan to review its energy policy and propose supplementary measures. A government-organized electricity price evaluation board in March
NO-LIMITS PARTNERSHIP: ‘The bottom line’ is that if the US were to have a conflict with China or Russia it would likely open up a second front with the other, a US senator said Beijing and Moscow could cooperate in a conflict over Taiwan, the top US intelligence chief told the US Senate this week. “We see China and Russia, for the first time, exercising together in relation to Taiwan and recognizing that this is a place where China definitely wants Russia to be working with them, and we see no reason why they wouldn’t,” US Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines told a US Senate Committee on Armed Services hearing on Thursday. US Senator Mike Rounds asked Haines about such a potential scenario. He also asked US Defense Intelligence Agency Director Lieutenant General Jeffrey Kruse
NOVEL METHODS: The PLA has adopted new approaches and recently conducted three combat readiness drills at night which included aircraft and ships, an official said Taiwan is monitoring China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) exercises for changes in their size or pattern as the nation prepares for president-elect William Lai’s (賴清德) inauguration on May 20, National Security Bureau (NSB) Director-General Tsai Ming-yen (蔡明彥) said yesterday. Tsai made the comment at a meeting of the Legislative Yuan’s Foreign Affairs and National Defense Committee, in response to Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Wang Ting-yu’s (王定宇) questions. China continues to employ a carrot-and-stick approach, in which it applies pressure with “gray zone” tactics, while attempting to entice Taiwanese with perks, Tsai said. These actions aim to help Beijing look like it has