With its panoramic views of the Nile but also of mud homes sinking into flooded swampland, Sudan’s flashiest hotel brings the flair of Muammar Qaddafi and Italian luxury to a capital struggling to keep up.
Burj al-Fateh Hotel — 18 floors of steel and glass shaped like a sail — is a nine-year Libyan dream turned architectural icon that cost US$190 million.
Financed by Lafico, the Libyan Foreign Investment Company, and designed by Italian architects, its 230 rooms, conference facilities, mall, restaurants, sports center and spa set new standards of luxury in Sudan, staff say.
PHOTO: AFP
“The high quality hotel is a landmark which is able to inject new economic and social life into the local community and, in particular, the service sector,” Lafico project director Emhemmed Ghula said in an e-mail.
The hotel has already been dubbed Qaddafi’s ball by bawdy Khartoumites — it has the same double meaning as in English — after the Libyan leader known for his wacky Arab nationalism.
That nickname is not appreciated by Ghula, who distanced Libya’s state-run Lafico from one of the longest-serving leaders in Africa.
“There is no connection whatsoever with any member of the leader’s family with this company,” he said.
In the nine years since Libya first dreamt up the project for its oil-rich north African neighbor, relations between the Qaddafi regime and Washington have undergone a seismic shift of the sort many would like Khartoum to emulate.
In 2006, the US dropped Libya from its list of state sponsors of terrorism — Sudan is still listed — two years after Qaddafi announced he was abandoning efforts to acquire weapons of mass destruction.
The final obstacle to full Libyan-US rehabilitation came just days before the Burj inauguration ceremony, when Tripoli and Washington on Aug. 14 signed a compensation deal for US reprisals and US victims of Libyan attacks.
Libya’s wings of foreign investment have spread wide, and the hotel’s management describes the Burj as a “gift from the government of Libya to the government of Sudan” to strengthen ties between the two.
It stands adjacent to the Chinese-built Friendship Hall, another Nile-front gift from another government, controversial in the West but intrinsic to the Khartoum boom.
Sudan is on the cusp of a potentially turbulent storm, however. Sudanese President Omar al-Beshir, who cut the ribbon at the hotel opening, faces a possible international arrest warrant for alleged genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes in Darfur.
Such a development would ensure his regime is treated as an international pariah, and Beshir warned last week that any International Criminal Court proceedings against him would deter foreigners from investing in Sudan.
But the hotel’s executives are not letting such matters dampen their prospects.
“We are so certain we’re going to make so much money out of this. There is definitely a risk — a risk in the political stability — but those risks are calculated,” US-Lebanese marketing manager Wissam Khalek said.
Sudan has been exporting oil since 1999, and for now at least there is little outward sign of a slowdown in a construction boom fuelled by Arab, Chinese, Indian and Malaysian investment.
Lafico has already begun work on a new tower of luxury serviced hotel apartments with an upscale family leisure center and revolving restaurants budgeted at US$66 million.
The intricate web of unrest, politics and business opportunities is second nature to Khalek, steeped in a backdrop of civil war in Lebanon where Beirut’s Commodore Hotel made a packet from journalists covering the conflict.
With the panache of a US marketing expert, he extols the virtues of the hotel rooms and of a burger he says cannot be beaten by the local competition, despite admitting that his wife and child may be better off in Lebanon.
The distinctive building has already featured as a backdrop to television news reports included on al-Jazeera, and has become a benchmark for the country’s post-oil economic development.
“I feel proud. It’s looking good,” said Giuseppe Freda, project manager from Italy-based company CMC, after an exhausting run-up to the opening. “It can be considered a landmark for Khartoum.”
The presidential suite, now occupied by Libyan Prime Minister Baghdadi Mahmudi for the opening, costs US$4,000 a night, and a standard room — or in Burj parlance a “luxurious room and suite” — costs US$250.
Despite logistics nightmares, the furniture and interiors were imported from Europe, mostly from that bastion of international style — Italy.
“It was not easy at all. Sudan lacks the infrastructure,” Ghula said. “Such building requires a lot of special trade and material and nothing can be found in Sudan. Everything had to be outsourced from abroad.”
The Burj al-Fateh Hotel also has a French chef. At Le Grill, the steak comes from Australia and a burger will set you back US$70. The Asian restaurant on the 18th floor, bizarrely called the Rickshaw, boasts breathtaking views.
The mall opens in December, and Khalek insists the shops will be top-end only, “catering to a certain client base.”
The Central Intelligence Agency factbook estimates that 40 percent of Sudanese live in poverty. Only a tiny elite can afford a coffee, let alone a hotel suite or US$2,250 for annual gym membership.
CALL FOR SUPPORT: President William Lai called on lawmakers across party lines to ensure the livelihood of Taiwanese and that national security is protected President William Lai (賴清德) yesterday called for bipartisan support for Taiwan’s investment in self-defense capabilities at the christening and launch of two coast guard vessels at CSBC Corp, Taiwan’s (台灣國際造船) shipyard in Kaohsiung. The Taipei (台北) is the fourth and final ship of the Chiayi-class offshore patrol vessels, and the Siraya (西拉雅) is the Coast Guard Administration’s (CGA) first-ever ocean patrol vessel, the government said. The Taipei is the fourth and final ship of the Chiayi-class offshore patrol vessels with a displacement of about 4,000 tonnes, Lai said. This ship class was ordered as a result of former president Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) 2018
‘SECRETS’: While saying China would not attack during his presidency, Donald Trump declined to say how Washington would respond if Beijing were to take military action US President Donald Trump said that China would not take military action against Taiwan while he is president, as the Chinese leaders “know the consequences.” Trump made the statement during an interview on CBS’ 60 Minutes program that aired on Sunday, a few days after his meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in South Korea. “He [Xi] has openly said, and his people have openly said at meetings, ‘we would never do anything while President Trump is president,’ because they know the consequences,” Trump said in the interview. However, he repeatedly declined to say exactly how Washington would respond in
WARFARE: All sectors of society should recognize, unite, and collectively resist and condemn Beijing’s cross-border suppression, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng said The number of Taiwanese detained because of legal affairs by Chinese authorities has tripled this year, as Beijing intensified its intimidation and division of Taiwanese by combining lawfare and cognitive warfare, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday. MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) made the statement in response to questions by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Puma Shen (沈柏洋) about the government’s response to counter Chinese public opinion warfare, lawfare and psychological warfare. Shen said he is also being investigated by China for promoting “Taiwanese independence.” He was referring to a report published on Tuesday last week by China’s state-run Xinhua news agency,
‘ADDITIONAL CONDITION’: Taiwan will work with like-minded countries to protect its right to participate in next year’s meeting, the foreign ministry said The US will “continue to press China for security arrangements and protocols that safeguard all participants when attending APEC meetings in China,” a US Department of State spokesperson said yesterday, after Beijing suggested that members must adhere to its “one China principle” to participate. “The United States insists on the full and equal participation of all APEC member economies — including Taiwan — consistent with APEC’s guidelines, rules and established practice, as affirmed by China in its offer to host in 2026,” the unnamed spokesperson said in response to media queries about China putting a “one China” principle condition on Taiwan’s
RSS