For more than two years, Kenneth Lay portrayed his prosecution as a witch hunt that rose from the rubble of Enron Corp. It was no secret that he planned to testify in his own defense.
And a lawyer for Jeffrey Skilling, Lay's co-defendant in the historic, four-month fraud and conspiracy trial, told jurors of his client: "You could not keep him off that witness stand."
For both men, it was an enormous gamble, and last week they both paid dearly for it. The former Enron chief executives were convicted of a total of 29 criminal counts, and are likely to spend many years -- perhaps the rest of their lives -- in prison.
PHOTO: AP
"I wanted very badly to believe what they were saying," juror Wendy Vaughan said after the verdicts were announced. "There were places in the testimony I felt their character was questionable."
The sheer number of charges, along with the fact that appeals courts are less likely to overturn jury verdicts -- and both sides praised the judge's handling of the case -- augur poorly for the men's chances of avoiding significant prison time if they appeal.
For white-collar criminal defendants -- and their expensive lawyers -- deciding whether to take the stand is never an easy decision, and legal experts conceded the Lay-Skilling trial was no different.
After all, the federal Enron Task Force had wrung guilty pleas from 16 former Enron executives, and lined up eight of them to testify against their former bosses. Leaving those charges simply unanswered might have been an equal gamble.
But legal experts, while stressing that Monday morning quarterbacking is all too easy, said the decision to testify was probably a mistake -- particularly for Lay, who quickly grew angry and combative when cross-examined by a federal prosecutor.
Not only did the Enron founder have less to defend himself against -- he faced six charges to Skilling's 28 -- Lay had more to lose in terms of his image before he got on the stand. And, what happens there can be so unpredictable, experts said.
"He has an image of being a warm, well-spoken ambassador for the company. And when he did take the stand, he came across in a very different way, in a way that the jurors apparently found arrogant," said Greg Markel, chair of litigation at Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP.
Skilling and Lay are to be sentenced on Sept. 11, and both are likely to get double-digit prison terms. Outside court, Skilling's lawyer and Lay himself both insisted the men were innocent.
Analysts said staying off the witness stand may have been less of an option for Skilling, who was forced to defend himself against 10 insider-trading counts related to his sale of Enron shares.
Jurors acquitted him on nine of those counts but convicted him of one -- a US$15.5 million sale six days after Sept. 11, 2001. Skilling initially told investigators he sold because of market fears after the terror attacks, but he had tried on Sept. 6 to sell 200,000 shares. On the stand, Skilling said he simply forgot that attempt.
Skilling was also convicted of 18 counts of fraud, conspiracy and lying to auditors. Some jurors said they could not reconcile Skilling's testimony with his reputation as a hands-on manager.
"It's hard to believe someone, such a hands-on individual, could not possibly know some of the things going on in the company," jury forewoman Deborah Smith said.
Legal experts also said they were surprised Lay and Skilling said on the witness stand -- indeed, based their entire defenses on the idea -- that there was no overarching fraud at Enron.
David Berg, a Houston civil litigator who has published a book about juries, called it "the Peter Pan defense -- clap real hard and Enron will reappear, and nothing wrong happened. Well, plenty wrong happened."
He said it may have hurt Lay that, having been denied a request to have his case heard separately from Skilling, Lay chose to pursue a unified defense with Skilling.
In that case, it may have helped if Lay had at least stayed off the stand, Berg said.
"If Lay had not testified, I think it would have allowed the jury to focus their attention on Skilling and to conclude that Lay was a victim of Skilling rather than a cohort," Berg said.
The four-and-a-half years since Enron's collapse touched off an era of corporate scandal are littered with examples of executives who took the witness stand and paid the price for it.
Former WorldCom Inc CEO Bernard Ebbers and former Tyco International Ltd CEO Dennis Kozlowski were convicted after taking the stand and insisting they did nothing wrong.
Richard Scrushy, former chief executive of HealthSouth Corp, was acquitted last year of fraud charges after five of his former chief financial officers took the stand and implicated him. He did not testify.
"I didn't take the stand because I knew they had not put on evidence proving I did anything wrong," Scrushy told Fox News Channel after Lay and Skilling were found guilty. "When they testified I thought maybe there was something there they were worried about."
NO-LIMITS PARTNERSHIP: ‘The bottom line’ is that if the US were to have a conflict with China or Russia it would likely open up a second front with the other, a US senator said Beijing and Moscow could cooperate in a conflict over Taiwan, the top US intelligence chief told the US Senate this week. “We see China and Russia, for the first time, exercising together in relation to Taiwan and recognizing that this is a place where China definitely wants Russia to be working with them, and we see no reason why they wouldn’t,” US Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines told a US Senate Committee on Armed Services hearing on Thursday. US Senator Mike Rounds asked Haines about such a potential scenario. He also asked US Defense Intelligence Agency Director Lieutenant General Jeffrey Kruse
INSPIRING: Taiwan has been a model in the Asia-Pacific region with its democratic transition, free and fair elections and open society, the vice president-elect said Taiwan can play a leadership role in the Asia-Pacific region, vice president-elect Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) told a forum in Taipei yesterday, highlighting the nation’s resilience in the face of geopolitical challenges. “Not only can Taiwan help, but Taiwan can lead ... not only can Taiwan play a leadership role, but Taiwan’s leadership is important to the world,” Hsiao told the annual forum hosted by the Center for Asia-Pacific Resilience and Innovation think tank. Hsiao thanked Taiwan’s international friends for their long-term support, citing the example of US President Joe Biden last month signing into law a bill to provide aid to Taiwan,
China’s intrusive and territorial claims in the Indo-Pacific region are “illegal, coercive, aggressive and deceptive,” new US Indo-Pacific Commander Admiral Samuel Paparo said on Friday, adding that he would continue working with allies and partners to keep the area free and open. Paparo made the remarks at a change-of-command ceremony at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam in Hawaii, where he took over the command from Admiral John Aquilino. “Our world faces a complex problem set in the troubling actions of the People’s Republic of China [PRC] and its rapid buildup of forces. We must be ready to answer the PRC’s increasingly intrusive and
STATE OF THE NATION: The legislature should invite the president to deliver an address every year, the TPP said, adding that Lai should also have to answer legislators’ questions The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) yesterday proposed inviting president-elect William Lai (賴清德) to make a historic first state of the nation address at the legislature following his inauguration on May 20. Lai is expected to face many domestic and international challenges, and should clarify his intended policies with the public’s representatives, KMT caucus secretary-general Hung Meng-kai (洪孟楷) said when making the proposal at a meeting of the legislature’s Procedure Committee. The committee voted to add the item to the agenda for Friday, along with another similar proposal put forward by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP). The invitation is in line with Article 15-2