Russ Root made an efficient move last year -- to a new home he had built in Goshen, Connecticut. While it is considerably bigger than his former house, in Chenango Forks, New York, it will cost far less to cool and to heat. That is because he did something he had thought about ever since he built his last house, 15 years earlier: He installed a geothermal system instead of an oil-guzzling boiler.
Now all the heat to warm his house is supplied by the earth beneath him. It's pumped up, through plastic piping, in water circulating in his backyard 1.8m underground -- where the temperature stays at about 45o -- and distributed by a fan through the house's ductwork as air warmed to around 95o.
The bill for Root's geothermal pump, its ground loop of piping and the house's ductwork was just over US$21,500. While a geothermal system, including labor, typically costs more than a comparable furnace and air-conditioning system, the price was about the same for Root, because the extra expense of digging and looping -- US$1,500 in his case -- was more than offset by a US$2,000 rebate from Connecticut Light and Power.
PHOTO: NY TIMES NEWS SERVICE
"I was in the black from the day I moved in," Root said, who is a lineman for the utility, which treated him as it would any other customer.
The water circulates through the geothermal pump over coils containing refrigerant, which absorbs its heat. The refrigerant is then raised to the higher temperature under pressure by a compressor. In the summer, the method is reversed. His home is cooled by circulating hot air out of the house -- a process that is similar to the operation of a refrigerator, an appliance that his basement pump resembles.
The system is quiet, clean and odorless, and uses little electricity. Maintenance consists of cleaning a filter every few months; the pipes are guaranteed to last 50 years. There are virtually no moving parts other than the pump. After living for more than a year in the 269.5m2 home, a third bigger than his old house, Root finds that his energy costs are running about 20 percent less than the US$2,700 he used to spend.
And he is likely to reap added benefits when he sells the house. A 1998 study commissioned by the Environmental Protection Agency found that a home's value rises an average of US$20 for each US$1 decrease in the annual utility bill.
Although the notion of tapping the earth's heat has been around forever and the basic technology has existed for decades, the many advantages have only recently begun to win widespread attention. The big reasons are concern for the environment and, more to the point, money. Geothermal systems are becoming increasingly competitive, even for homes in which an old furnace and air-conditioning system must first be removed.
After a decade in which installations grew 20 percent a year, a million American homes -- both old and new -- now have geothermal heat pumps, said Jessica Commins, a spokeswoman for the Geothermal Heat Pump Consortium. And a growing number of celebrity homeowners who use them -- like the country music star Toby Keith, the Home Depot co-founder Arthur Blank, the actor Ed Begley Jr. and President George W. Bush -- have helped to raise the technology's profile.
Energy legislation last summer increased the financial support for these systems. The law provides for US$300 in federal tax incentives and includes a provision allowing for a US$2,000 federal incentive for home improvements that reduce energy costs by more than 50 percent. Geothermal systems can trim 30 percent to 75 percent of the cost to heat and cool, so many installations would qualify.
But the biggest driver is the cost of fossil fuel. With the Energy Department predicting huge jumps in residential oil and natural gas costs for winter heating -- 27 percent for oil and 41 percent for gas -- shipments of geothermal pumps doubled during the last three months, Commins said.
Now, "the front-end costs are within reach," Roy Mink, director of the Energy Department's geothermal program said. At the same time, "there's more competition for geothermal business, and that's driving down the price of installing them by 10 percent," he said.
The payback period depends on a variety of factors, including the type of system, the installer and the location and size of the house. Typically, it takes three to 10 years before fuel savings equal the cost of the pipes and placing them in the ground; indoors, the cost of traditional and geothermal systems is roughly the same. Of course, the greater the heating and cooling needs and the higher the fuel costs, the quicker the payback. A 232m2 home in New York City with a standard furnace and central air costs US$3,200 a year, on average, for heating, cooling and hot water, versus US$1,800 for a geothermal system; in Los Angeles, the figures are US$1,600 and US$800.
Installers generally stick to one brand of pump to get better pricing from the manufacturer, so the installer and pump tend to be a package deal. The standard for installers is certification by the International Ground Source Heat Pump Association; the most desirable pumps carry an Energy Star efficiency rating. Among the brands earning that rating are WaterFurnace, Climate Master, Trane, HydroDelta, McQuay and Econar.
"Water Furnace is the Cadillac," Steve Brown, co-owner of Carl Franklin Homes in Dallas, a builder of homes with geothermal systems, said. "But there are a lot of good pumps, and it's more important who puts in the system. You have to shop around to get the best deal."
Installers generally recommend three types of systems: those with horizontal, open vertical and closed vertical loops. A horizontal loop system, typically an E-formation that requires about a half-acre, is recommended when homeowners have the space, as Root did. It is generally the least expensive, and its costs fall further if it is part of new construction, because its installation can be combined with the laying of the foundation.
The cost of a loop varies greatly, from about US$1,000 for a horizontal loop connected to a modest house in the West, where geothermal systems are more common and homeowners have more options, to US$50,000 or more for a vertical closed loop attached to a mansion atop New England bedrock.
A vertical loop, generally two or more connected branches extending more than 60m into the ground, is the urban choice; it requires less surface area but is likely to cost more because of the drilling expense.
There are also open vertical systems, which are drilled in much the same way as a water well and may be used when there is access to an aquifer. These may do double duty in rural areas by providing homes with drinking water.
Steve Toma has an open system in his new 650m2 home in Mendham, New Jersey, that taps a well 427m down. Because of its unusual depth, it was expensive to drill. He also has extras like filtration equipment and a radiant-heat grid, which add significantly to the cost. His system cost more than US$135,000, roughly 30 percent more than an equivalent traditional oil or natural gas installation; he expects to earn back the difference in about eight years.
"It's a big investment, but there's the green aspect," he said. "You can't put a dollar on it."
For a relatively few lucky homeowners, there is an option that delivers the best of both green worlds. It's the pond loop, for homes near a body of water that is at least 2.4m deep year-round. There are no digging or drilling costs, just the cost of a Slinky-like tubing coil and the labor of placing it at the bottom of the pond or lake.
"It's generally the cheapest," Kirk Bellanca said, a co-owner of Enviro-Tech, an installer in Staatsburg, New York "You should get permission from the town, but they're almost always very supportive. The fish like it, too. It becomes part of their habitat."
In a sense, two comfortable homes for the price of one.
NO HUMAN ERROR: After the incident, the Coast Guard Administration said it would obtain uncrewed aerial vehicles and vessels to boost its detection capacity Authorities would improve border control to prevent unlawful entry into Taiwan’s waters and safeguard national security, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday after a Chinese man reached the nation’s coast on an inflatable boat, saying he “defected to freedom.” The man was found on a rubber boat when he was about to set foot on Taiwan at the estuary of Houkeng River (後坑溪) near Taiping Borough (太平) in New Taipei City’s Linkou District (林口), authorities said. The Coast Guard Administration’s (CGA) northern branch said it received a report at 6:30am yesterday morning from the New Taipei City Fire Department about a
IN BEIJING’S FAVOR: A China Coast Guard spokesperson said that the Chinese maritime police would continue to carry out law enforcement activities in waters it claims The Philippines withdrew its coast guard vessel from a South China Sea shoal that has recently been at the center of tensions with Beijing. BRP Teresa Magbanua “was compelled to return to port” from Sabina Shoal (Xianbin Shoal, 仙濱暗沙) due to bad weather, depleted supplies and the need to evacuate personnel requiring medical care, the Philippine Coast Guard (PCG) spokesman Jay Tarriela said yesterday in a post on X. The Philippine vessel “will be in tiptop shape to resume her mission” after it has been resupplied and repaired, Philippine Executive Secretary Lucas Bersamin, who heads the nation’s maritime council, said
CHINA POLICY: At the seventh US-EU Dialogue on China, the two sides issued strong support for Taiwan and condemned China’s actions in the South China Sea The US and EU issued a joint statement on Wednesday supporting Taiwan’s international participation, notably omitting the “one China” policy in a departure from previous similar statements, following high-level talks on China and the Indo-Pacific region. The statement also urged China to show restraint in the Taiwan Strait. US Deputy Secretary of State Kurt Campbell and European External Action Service Secretary-General Stefano Sannino cochaired the seventh US-EU Dialogue on China and the sixth US-EU Indo-Pacific Consultations from Monday to Tuesday. Since the Indo-Pacific consultations were launched in 2021, references to the “one China” policy have appeared in every statement apart from the
More than 500 people on Saturday marched in New York in support of Taiwan’s entry to the UN, significantly more people than previous years. The march, coinciding with the ongoing 79th session of the UN General Assembly, comes close on the heels of growing international discourse regarding the meaning of UN Resolution 2758. Resolution 2758, adopted by the UN General Assembly in 1971, recognizes the People’s Republic of China (PRC) as the “only lawful representative of China.” It resulted in the Republic of China (ROC) losing its seat at the UN to the PRC. Taiwan has since been excluded from