Every country talks about free trade, but it seems none wants to practise it. This appears to be the common denominator in trade conflicts that are heating up again between the US and Europe and China and the industrialized countries.
The US, the largest trading power in the world and traditionally the moral standardbearer for free trade, without a doubt is among the "sinners" who can't resist reaching for the forbidden fruit of the government subsidy. In Washington, where globalization is a favorite topic, the countries and industries that profit from it are not spared the pain that it causes.
US President George W. Bush, who always preaches the notion that free trade means finding new markets for US products beyond US borders, appears to be giving in to pressure for more protection for the US economy.
Irwin Stelzer, economic policy director of the Hudson Institute speaks of a brewing storm that threatens to sweep away a consensus in Washington reached over decades over the advantages of free trade.
Chinese Trade Minister Bo Xilai is not alone in accusing the US (and the EU) of practising unfair protectionism and maintaining a moral double standard, according to US news reports. In light of a horrendous US trade deficit, signs are mounting that protectionism is growing.
One US giant that is rejoicing over the situation is Boeing Co in the northwestern US city of Seattle. Congress recently passed a bill that in reality bars the US Air Force from purchasing refuelling tanker jets from the European Aeronautic, Defense & Space Co (EADS).
The US' air force has been seeking to fill a contract for US$100 billion. EADS is not named in the bill, but it is clearly what the bill means with its reference to "foreign companies ... that receive government subsidies".
The US and Europeans have been arguing for years, occasionally bitterly, over whether subsidies distort competition.
The US wants government support for European jet manufacturer Airbus to be eliminated, while the Europeans argue that the US indirectly subsidizes Boeing.
Washington also has been caught somewhat flat-footed by a new trade challenge from China. Since the loosening of textile trade laws in January, imports from China have surged. The result is efforts in the US to set up barriers to this new trade.
Washington has established quotas and is considering further measures, but the EU recently struck a deal. Under its terms China agreed to rein in over the next three years the growth in its textile exports to Europe. The deal heads off the threat of a trade conflict between Beijing and Brussels.
The agreement was struck late yesterday in Shanghai after a ten- hour session of talks between Peter Mandelson, the EU's Trade Commissioner, and Bo Xilai, China's Commerce Minister. It limits the annual increase in the volume of China's textile exports to an average of 10 percent per year until 2008.
China's portion of the US clothing market will rise from 16 percent currently to 50 percent, according to a WTO study. This development has arisen so quickly, it has shocked the US government, which has used the issue to highlight its complaint that China's exports are boosted by Beijing's control of the yuan's exchange rate.
"Is globalization coming to an end?" the Christian Science Monitor asked recently. It would be a worrisome signal from the largest trade power in the world if a few cotton and sugar farmers are able to stop such a deal, the newspaper added.
But the conflict between the US and China appears increasingly threatening to the notion of worldwide free trade.
Stelzer said if the Chinese can't find a compromise with the US under which they can save face and if Bush is unable to control the protectionists, the free trade system as we know it might not survive.
The Wall Street Journal warned that turning back history and granting a green light to protectionists would create a vicious circle of retaliatory measures from Beijing.
The US should prove to the world that it has the ability to take on the challenges of a free market. But that would be asking too much, the newspaper said.
NO-LIMITS PARTNERSHIP: ‘The bottom line’ is that if the US were to have a conflict with China or Russia it would likely open up a second front with the other, a US senator said Beijing and Moscow could cooperate in a conflict over Taiwan, the top US intelligence chief told the US Senate this week. “We see China and Russia, for the first time, exercising together in relation to Taiwan and recognizing that this is a place where China definitely wants Russia to be working with them, and we see no reason why they wouldn’t,” US Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines told a US Senate Committee on Armed Services hearing on Thursday. US Senator Mike Rounds asked Haines about such a potential scenario. He also asked US Defense Intelligence Agency Director Lieutenant General Jeffrey Kruse
INSPIRING: Taiwan has been a model in the Asia-Pacific region with its democratic transition, free and fair elections and open society, the vice president-elect said Taiwan can play a leadership role in the Asia-Pacific region, vice president-elect Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) told a forum in Taipei yesterday, highlighting the nation’s resilience in the face of geopolitical challenges. “Not only can Taiwan help, but Taiwan can lead ... not only can Taiwan play a leadership role, but Taiwan’s leadership is important to the world,” Hsiao told the annual forum hosted by the Center for Asia-Pacific Resilience and Innovation think tank. Hsiao thanked Taiwan’s international friends for their long-term support, citing the example of US President Joe Biden last month signing into law a bill to provide aid to Taiwan,
China’s intrusive and territorial claims in the Indo-Pacific region are “illegal, coercive, aggressive and deceptive,” new US Indo-Pacific Commander Admiral Samuel Paparo said on Friday, adding that he would continue working with allies and partners to keep the area free and open. Paparo made the remarks at a change-of-command ceremony at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam in Hawaii, where he took over the command from Admiral John Aquilino. “Our world faces a complex problem set in the troubling actions of the People’s Republic of China [PRC] and its rapid buildup of forces. We must be ready to answer the PRC’s increasingly intrusive and
STATE OF THE NATION: The legislature should invite the president to deliver an address every year, the TPP said, adding that Lai should also have to answer legislators’ questions The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) yesterday proposed inviting president-elect William Lai (賴清德) to make a historic first state of the nation address at the legislature following his inauguration on May 20. Lai is expected to face many domestic and international challenges, and should clarify his intended policies with the public’s representatives, KMT caucus secretary-general Hung Meng-kai (洪孟楷) said when making the proposal at a meeting of the legislature’s Procedure Committee. The committee voted to add the item to the agenda for Friday, along with another similar proposal put forward by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP). The invitation is in line with Article 15-2