Was there always this much pressure to get rich? Achieving wealth has long been part of the American dream, but now you're expected to want to marry a millionaire, be a "Survivor," win American Idol -- or at least look as if you know people who know Paris Hilton. Even personal finance books, which once just explained how to manage money, now insist that you do whatever it takes to get rich.
Suze Orman urges readers to find The Courage to Be Rich. David Bach cautions that only Smart Couples Finish Rich. Robert Kiyosaki's Rich Dad, Poor Dad series is all about overcoming negative parental influences so you can be rich. And just last week I saw yet another book: Nice Girls Don't Get Rich. Oh, well.
I'm not rich, in case you were wondering. I'm not even a taxi ride away from rich. My husband and I rent our apartment in Brooklyn. We suffer through endless repairs on our Catskill fixer-upper and our aging Subaru. While I'd love to snag a windfall as much as anyone else, I'm exhausted by all this emphasis on wealth. It's like some National Geographic special: Rich -- The Ultimate Destination.
The danger in buying into the idea that you're going to be rich is that you'll spend accordingly -- regardless of the impact on your personal financial health. Consider the following:
Personal savings rates are the lowest they've been since the US Federal Reserve started tracking this data in 1946.
US consumer debt has reached a high of US$2.1 trillion (and that doesn't include mortgages).
From 2001 to 2003 Americans cashed out US$333 billion worth of equity from their homes -- and spent 51 percent of that paying down other debts and covering expenses like rent and groceries.
The trouble comes not just from wanting to be rich, but feeling entitled to it. A 2003 Gallup poll found that about a third of Americans said they expected to be rich some day -- and 51 percent of those with incomes of US$75,000-plus felt that way. A recent Times poll had slightly different results, with just over half of respondents saying it was unlikely they would get rich, while 45 percent thought it was very or somewhat likely.
What's interesting, according to Thomas DiPrete, a professor of sociology at Columbia University, is that most people don't have a realistic idea of what "rich" means.
For example, in that Gallup poll, only 8 percent of people said that they'd need an income of US$1 million a year to be rich. The median response was US$122,000. That's a lot more than the average American makes, but it won't even cover the cost of owning a small, private jet (let alone flying in it).
DiPrete analyzed income data going back to 1968 to gauge whether people at various income levels were likely to become rich. I'll spare you the standard deviations, but basically, it's really, really, really unlikely that even the above-average Jack or Jill will ever hit that million-dollar-a-year threshold. Someone earning US$120,000 today, in fact, has only a 19 percent chance of making US$340,000 within the next 15 years.
The rest of us are left holding our lottery tickets -- and then going shopping. Why not buy something expensive? You can't be overextended if you're going to win big one day.
While DiPrete hesitated to link expectations of wealth and levels of consumption, he said that when people believe they'll be able to afford their current purchases in their (richer) future, "that makes it safer to go into debt."
Sadly, I know the havoc that results when you think outside your wallet.
My credit cards could tell you all about it. So here's one solution: forget rich. It would free up so much time and energy if "get rich" got crossed off everyone's to-do list. Trying to live a sane, productive financial life is hard enough. (I could use some of that energy to shore up financial essentials, like the pale, quivering mess that is my IRA.)
I'm sure most people would rather hear their odds of getting rich are great. I'd love to believe it myself. But accepting that you aren't going to be snuggling into the lap of luxury any time soon can be a blessing.
Smart people may finish rich, but they probably won't. How about a book called: "Smart People Finish Just Fine, Thanks." It's not sexy and it may never be a best seller, but downshifting from a focus on wealth could do more to enhance your bottom line than you ever dreamed.
CHIPMAKING INVESTMENT: J.W. Kuo told legislators that Department of Investment Review approval would be needed were Washington to seek a TSMC board seat Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) yesterday said he received information about a possible US government investment in Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) and an assessment of the possible effect on the firm requires further discussion. If the US were to invest in TSMC, the plan would need to be reviewed by the Department of Investment Review, Kuo told reporters ahead of a hearing of the legislature’s Economics Committee. Kuo’s remarks came after US Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick on Tuesday said that the US government is looking into the federal government taking equity stakes in computer chip manufacturers that
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers have declared they survived recall votes to remove them from office today, although official results are still pending as the vote counting continues. Although final tallies from the Central Election Commission (CEC) are still pending, preliminary results indicate that the recall campaigns against all seven KMT lawmakers have fallen short. As of 6:10 pm, Taichung Legislators Yen Kuan-heng (顏寬恒) and Yang Chiung-ying (楊瓊瓔), Hsinchu County Legislator Lin Szu-ming (林思銘), Nantou County Legislator Ma Wen-chun (馬文君) and New Taipei City Legislator Lo Ming-tsai (羅明才) had all announced they
POWER PLANT POLL: The TPP said the number of ‘yes’ votes showed that the energy policy should be corrected, and the KMT said the result was a win for the people’s voice The government does not rule out advanced nuclear energy generation if it meets the government’s three prerequisites, President William Lai (賴清德) said last night after the number of votes in favor of restarting a nuclear power plant outnumbered the “no” votes in a referendum yesterday. The referendum failed to pass, despite getting more “yes” votes, as the Referendum Act (公民投票法) states that the vote would only pass if the votes in favor account for more than one-fourth of the total number of eligible voters and outnumber the opposing votes. Yesterday’s referendum question was: “Do you agree that the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant
Nvidia Corp CEO Jensen Huang (黃仁勳) yesterday visited Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電), as the chipmaker prepares for volume production of Nvidia’s next-generation artificial intelligence (AI) chips. It was Huang’s third trip to Taiwan this year, indicating that Nvidia’s supply chain is deeply connected to Taiwan. Its partners also include packager Siliconware Precision Industries Co (矽品精密) and server makers Hon Hai Precision Industry Co (鴻海精密) and Quanta Computer Inc (廣達). “My main purpose is to visit TSMC,” Huang said yesterday. “As you know, we have next-generation architecture called Rubin. Rubin is very advanced. We have now taped out six brand new