It takes just two words to enrage the average Japanese person these days: Muneo Suzuki.
The former political heavyweight, who two weeks ago resigned in disgrace from the ruling Liberal Democratic Party, personifies all that is wrong in the world's second-biggest economy. He reluctantly quit the party amid allegations of bid rigging and influence-peddling to direct lucrative Foreign Ministry aid contracts to companies from his constituency.
Suzuki's sordid tale is just one of many to come to light in the past two weeks. Koichi Kato, who made a run for Japan's top job less than two years ago, resigned from the LDP after a former aide was arrested on tax evasion charges. This week, Social Democratic Party lawmaker Kiyomi Tsujimoto admitted to spending a former aide's salary on personal expenses.
Corruption scandals are hardly new in Japanese politics -- 1970s Prime Minister Kakuei Tanaka was charged with accepting about US$1.7 million in bribes from Lockheed Corp to help the US airplane maker sell 21 jets to a Japanese airline.
Still, the latest rash has captivated public imagination. They have also reminded the world of the corruption that exists at the highest levels of Japanese government -- and undermines it. As the nation's economy crumbles, some politicians are too busy seeking power or lining their pockets to fix the problem.
The events show just how disconnected many politicians are from Japan's electorate. As unemployment climbs to record levels, deflation worsens and bankruptcies soar, politicians are doing nothing to stop the bloodletting. Worse, many spend more time worrying about their own careers -- and bank accounts -- than the people they're meant to represent.
No one's naive enough to believe Japan has a monopoly on corruption -- it's got lots of competition right here in Asia. Yet, as Suzuki's case attests, Tokyo is rich with examples of lawmakers and bureaucrats misusing funds. Look no further than Japan's Foreign Ministry, where bureaucrats used a secret slush fund to wine and dine diplomats, or local governments, where myriad small-town mayors have been charged with bid-rigging offenses.
Things would seem less dire if forces were in place to clean the smear of corruption and cronyism from the LDP. Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi certainly hasn't lived up to his campaign promise to "Change the LDP, Change Japan!" Now, as Koizumi approaches the end of his first year in office, it's clear that it's business as usual in Japanese politics.
For all his assertions to the contrary, Koizumi has proven to be an old-style LDP apparatchik. Sure, he wears nicer suits, has better hair and speaks differently than his comrades, but he's cut from the same cloth.
Koizumi's all-talk-no-action act has restored the cloud of gloom and uncertainty hanging over Tokyo. That's quite a letdown for this one-party nation of 126 million people, who lack anything approaching a viable opposition. The LDP has ruled for all but 10 months since the US occupation forces pulled out in 1952.
Since the LDP is mostly a network of entrenched politicians looking out for themselves, change is pretty much impossible.
Is it any wonder so many Japanese citizens have disengaged from the political process? That they don't get to vote directly for the Prime Minister is one reason for the lack of grass-roots activism.
Add in the fact that the LDP is the only game in town and you have a perfect recipe for voter apathy.
Even when a candidate sells himself or herself as a maverick -- here Koizumi comes to mind -- they so rarely, if ever, turn out to be the real thing.
All of this gets at the reason Japan's economy is in this mess.
Even when a well-intentioned reformer steps forward, they come up against an impenetrable wall of resistance. Folks of Suzuki's ilk are there to stop change at every turn. For politicians like Suzuki, change means losing power, and their seat on the gravy grain.
One wonders if Japan has any hope unless the LDP is tossed from power for good. Maybe Koizumi should adopt a new slogan of "Destroy the LDP, Save Japan." Does the public want to stop corruption? At first glance, the question seems absurd, says Robert Feldman, chief economist at Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co in Tokyo. Yet in recent discussions with investors across Japan, a strange phenomenon emerged.
While discussing the idea of a Newt Gingrich-style "Contract with Japan" with clients in Tokyo, corruption was on top of the agenda. However, discussing the same issues with investors in Sendai -- a city about two hours northeast of the capital -- there was only one vote out of about 50 for putting corruption among the top three items in such a contract.
The implication, Feldman says, is that urban voters want to root out corruption, but rural voters don't, presumably because they benefit most from the public works contracts that are at the heart of corruption. If this implication is true, then prospects for reform are questionable, because the voting districts remain heavily skewed toward rural areas.
This view jibes with others you hear and read. In a recent poll on JapanToday.com about whether Suzuki should have resigned, 44-year old Yoshihiro Nakashima had this to say: "I think he should resign. I would support him if he were from my hometown. It's natural for people to support their local candidate because he can bring them lots of benefits."
In other words, as long as my town is benefiting or I'm getting my slice of the pie, whatever shady things Suzuki does are fine.
If you believe political change happens only when the people want it, Japan may have a ways to go.
NO HUMAN ERROR: After the incident, the Coast Guard Administration said it would obtain uncrewed aerial vehicles and vessels to boost its detection capacity Authorities would improve border control to prevent unlawful entry into Taiwan’s waters and safeguard national security, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday after a Chinese man reached the nation’s coast on an inflatable boat, saying he “defected to freedom.” The man was found on a rubber boat when he was about to set foot on Taiwan at the estuary of Houkeng River (後坑溪) near Taiping Borough (太平) in New Taipei City’s Linkou District (林口), authorities said. The Coast Guard Administration’s (CGA) northern branch said it received a report at 6:30am yesterday morning from the New Taipei City Fire Department about a
IN BEIJING’S FAVOR: A China Coast Guard spokesperson said that the Chinese maritime police would continue to carry out law enforcement activities in waters it claims The Philippines withdrew its coast guard vessel from a South China Sea shoal that has recently been at the center of tensions with Beijing. BRP Teresa Magbanua “was compelled to return to port” from Sabina Shoal (Xianbin Shoal, 仙濱暗沙) due to bad weather, depleted supplies and the need to evacuate personnel requiring medical care, the Philippine Coast Guard (PCG) spokesman Jay Tarriela said yesterday in a post on X. The Philippine vessel “will be in tiptop shape to resume her mission” after it has been resupplied and repaired, Philippine Executive Secretary Lucas Bersamin, who heads the nation’s maritime council, said
CHINA POLICY: At the seventh US-EU Dialogue on China, the two sides issued strong support for Taiwan and condemned China’s actions in the South China Sea The US and EU issued a joint statement on Wednesday supporting Taiwan’s international participation, notably omitting the “one China” policy in a departure from previous similar statements, following high-level talks on China and the Indo-Pacific region. The statement also urged China to show restraint in the Taiwan Strait. US Deputy Secretary of State Kurt Campbell and European External Action Service Secretary-General Stefano Sannino cochaired the seventh US-EU Dialogue on China and the sixth US-EU Indo-Pacific Consultations from Monday to Tuesday. Since the Indo-Pacific consultations were launched in 2021, references to the “one China” policy have appeared in every statement apart from the
More than 500 people on Saturday marched in New York in support of Taiwan’s entry to the UN, significantly more people than previous years. The march, coinciding with the ongoing 79th session of the UN General Assembly, comes close on the heels of growing international discourse regarding the meaning of UN Resolution 2758. Resolution 2758, adopted by the UN General Assembly in 1971, recognizes the People’s Republic of China (PRC) as the “only lawful representative of China.” It resulted in the Republic of China (ROC) losing its seat at the UN to the PRC. Taiwan has since been excluded from