Arthur Andersen LLP said in an internal memorandum that the firm's policy on handling documents was so imprecise it may have led to shredding of Enron Corp records now at the heart of the auditor's indictment.
The Chicago-based firm's memo was sent to Andersen partners on Thursday, the same day the firm's indictment for obstruction of justice was announced by the Justice Department. The memo was intended for briefing clients on why they should stay with the accounting firm, said a person familiar with the matter. Legal experts say the memo may hurt Andersen's legal defense.
Andersen's "document policy, with its lack of clarity and ambiguities, played a key role in the destruction of Enron-related documents that occurred in the fall of 2001," the firm said in the 14-page memo, obtained by Bloomberg News.
PHOTO: AFP
The indictment said Andersen, Enron's auditor, destroyed "tons" of material at four offices after the firm was alerted on Oct. 19 that the Securities and Exchange Commission was looking into Enron. The energy trader collapsed and declared bankruptcy on Dec. 2 amid accusations it distorted its financial record-keeping.
Andersen's memo said the vagueness of the document-retention policy may have contributed to misinterpretation of an e-mail sent by in-house attorney Nancy Temple at the Chicago headquarters.
On Oct. 12, as Andersen's Houston office was discovering inaccuracies in Enron's accounting, Temple joined in the review and inserted language calling the accounting on Enron's Raptor partnerships "inappropriate," the memo said.
Forty minutes later, Temple sent an e-mail to Michael Odom, a senior partner in Houston, reminding him of the document policy, the memo said. Odom forwarded the message to David Duncan, lead partner on the Enron audit who may have interpreted it as instructions to shred documents, Andersen's 14-page memo said.
Andersen's policy calls for storing essential work papers in a central file after an audit. Everything else -- drafts, internal memos and the like -- are to be destroyed as soon as they become "expendable," the memo said.
"There was no clear guidance" when litigation was pending as to "what obligations existed if Andersen was not a party to, but was only a witness in, litigation or government investigation," the memo said.
Temple and Odom didn't return phone calls today.
Admitting a lack of clarity may undercut Andersen's defense that senior officials didn't authorize the shredding by employees in Houston, said Robert Plotkin, a white-collar defense lawyer with Paul Hastings Janofsky & Walker in Washington. Companies typically must show that employees were acting outside the scope of their jobs to defeat criminal charges, he said.
"You have to show that people were acting contrary to clear corporate policies," Plotkin said.
At the time of the Enron investigation, Andersen was under a legal order not to commit any wrongdoing -- part of a settlement with the SEC last June of a landmark case involving Waste Management Inc, the biggest US trash hauler.
Andersen agreed to a US$7 million fine -- then the SEC's biggest against an accounting firm -- and paid US$20 million to settle investor lawsuits alleging the firm issued misleading audits. Andersen also previously paid US$110 million Andersen to settle similar claims by investors in appliance maker Sunbeam Corp.
In both cases, the SEC had access to Andersen's work papers, possibly leading to the firm's new document policy, first communicated to employees in May 2000.
When Odom spoke to accountants about the document policy on Oct. 10, he "explained to the group that in several recent lawsuits Andersen had had to produce documents that should not have been retained and that it was `embarrassing and extra work' for Andersen to be retaining any materials not required for the central files," the Andersen memo said.
"Odom then explained the policy does not permit document destruction when litigation is pending," the memo said. "But that if documents are destroyed and `litigation is filed the next day, that's great ... because ... we followed our own policy. And whatever there was that might have been of interest to somebody is gone and is irretrievable.'" On Oct. 12, Temple's e-mail reminded the audit team that it "will be helpful to make sure that we have complied with the policy," the memo said.
On Oct. 23, after the SEC made initial contacts with Enron, Duncan called staff meetings in Houston about the document policy, the memo said. Contemporaneous notes show that one meeting included "the directive `clean up -- documentation' followed by the explanation `SEC voluntary request/two suits filed, more on way,'" the memo said.
"It is possible," the memo said, "that Duncan still had this [Temple] e-mail in mind when he met with his audit staff 11 days later and urged them to take action to come into compliance with the firm's policy." Destruction of Enron documents intensified on that day, Oct. 23, with the shredding of 26 trunks of records and 24 boxes during the week, the memo said. The shredding continued the following week, although at a slower rate, and didn't stop until Nov. 8 when the SEC subpoenaed Andersen records.
In its rebuttal to the indictment, Andersen said staff in Houston shredded documents without approval from headquarters.
In testimony before a House committee in January, Temple denied she intended to prompt shredding of Enron records. "I did not instruct Mr. Duncan to shred documents," Temple said. She said she told Duncan's team "to retain the relevant documents."
NO HUMAN ERROR: After the incident, the Coast Guard Administration said it would obtain uncrewed aerial vehicles and vessels to boost its detection capacity Authorities would improve border control to prevent unlawful entry into Taiwan’s waters and safeguard national security, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday after a Chinese man reached the nation’s coast on an inflatable boat, saying he “defected to freedom.” The man was found on a rubber boat when he was about to set foot on Taiwan at the estuary of Houkeng River (後坑溪) near Taiping Borough (太平) in New Taipei City’s Linkou District (林口), authorities said. The Coast Guard Administration’s (CGA) northern branch said it received a report at 6:30am yesterday morning from the New Taipei City Fire Department about a
IN BEIJING’S FAVOR: A China Coast Guard spokesperson said that the Chinese maritime police would continue to carry out law enforcement activities in waters it claims The Philippines withdrew its coast guard vessel from a South China Sea shoal that has recently been at the center of tensions with Beijing. BRP Teresa Magbanua “was compelled to return to port” from Sabina Shoal (Xianbin Shoal, 仙濱暗沙) due to bad weather, depleted supplies and the need to evacuate personnel requiring medical care, the Philippine Coast Guard (PCG) spokesman Jay Tarriela said yesterday in a post on X. The Philippine vessel “will be in tiptop shape to resume her mission” after it has been resupplied and repaired, Philippine Executive Secretary Lucas Bersamin, who heads the nation’s maritime council, said
CHINA POLICY: At the seventh US-EU Dialogue on China, the two sides issued strong support for Taiwan and condemned China’s actions in the South China Sea The US and EU issued a joint statement on Wednesday supporting Taiwan’s international participation, notably omitting the “one China” policy in a departure from previous similar statements, following high-level talks on China and the Indo-Pacific region. The statement also urged China to show restraint in the Taiwan Strait. US Deputy Secretary of State Kurt Campbell and European External Action Service Secretary-General Stefano Sannino cochaired the seventh US-EU Dialogue on China and the sixth US-EU Indo-Pacific Consultations from Monday to Tuesday. Since the Indo-Pacific consultations were launched in 2021, references to the “one China” policy have appeared in every statement apart from the
More than 500 people on Saturday marched in New York in support of Taiwan’s entry to the UN, significantly more people than previous years. The march, coinciding with the ongoing 79th session of the UN General Assembly, comes close on the heels of growing international discourse regarding the meaning of UN Resolution 2758. Resolution 2758, adopted by the UN General Assembly in 1971, recognizes the People’s Republic of China (PRC) as the “only lawful representative of China.” It resulted in the Republic of China (ROC) losing its seat at the UN to the PRC. Taiwan has since been excluded from