Arthur Andersen LLP said in an internal memorandum that the firm's policy on handling documents was so imprecise it may have led to shredding of Enron Corp records now at the heart of the auditor's indictment.
The Chicago-based firm's memo was sent to Andersen partners on Thursday, the same day the firm's indictment for obstruction of justice was announced by the Justice Department. The memo was intended for briefing clients on why they should stay with the accounting firm, said a person familiar with the matter. Legal experts say the memo may hurt Andersen's legal defense.
Andersen's "document policy, with its lack of clarity and ambiguities, played a key role in the destruction of Enron-related documents that occurred in the fall of 2001," the firm said in the 14-page memo, obtained by Bloomberg News.
PHOTO: AFP
The indictment said Andersen, Enron's auditor, destroyed "tons" of material at four offices after the firm was alerted on Oct. 19 that the Securities and Exchange Commission was looking into Enron. The energy trader collapsed and declared bankruptcy on Dec. 2 amid accusations it distorted its financial record-keeping.
Andersen's memo said the vagueness of the document-retention policy may have contributed to misinterpretation of an e-mail sent by in-house attorney Nancy Temple at the Chicago headquarters.
On Oct. 12, as Andersen's Houston office was discovering inaccuracies in Enron's accounting, Temple joined in the review and inserted language calling the accounting on Enron's Raptor partnerships "inappropriate," the memo said.
Forty minutes later, Temple sent an e-mail to Michael Odom, a senior partner in Houston, reminding him of the document policy, the memo said. Odom forwarded the message to David Duncan, lead partner on the Enron audit who may have interpreted it as instructions to shred documents, Andersen's 14-page memo said.
Andersen's policy calls for storing essential work papers in a central file after an audit. Everything else -- drafts, internal memos and the like -- are to be destroyed as soon as they become "expendable," the memo said.
"There was no clear guidance" when litigation was pending as to "what obligations existed if Andersen was not a party to, but was only a witness in, litigation or government investigation," the memo said.
Temple and Odom didn't return phone calls today.
Admitting a lack of clarity may undercut Andersen's defense that senior officials didn't authorize the shredding by employees in Houston, said Robert Plotkin, a white-collar defense lawyer with Paul Hastings Janofsky & Walker in Washington. Companies typically must show that employees were acting outside the scope of their jobs to defeat criminal charges, he said.
"You have to show that people were acting contrary to clear corporate policies," Plotkin said.
At the time of the Enron investigation, Andersen was under a legal order not to commit any wrongdoing -- part of a settlement with the SEC last June of a landmark case involving Waste Management Inc, the biggest US trash hauler.
Andersen agreed to a US$7 million fine -- then the SEC's biggest against an accounting firm -- and paid US$20 million to settle investor lawsuits alleging the firm issued misleading audits. Andersen also previously paid US$110 million Andersen to settle similar claims by investors in appliance maker Sunbeam Corp.
In both cases, the SEC had access to Andersen's work papers, possibly leading to the firm's new document policy, first communicated to employees in May 2000.
When Odom spoke to accountants about the document policy on Oct. 10, he "explained to the group that in several recent lawsuits Andersen had had to produce documents that should not have been retained and that it was `embarrassing and extra work' for Andersen to be retaining any materials not required for the central files," the Andersen memo said.
"Odom then explained the policy does not permit document destruction when litigation is pending," the memo said. "But that if documents are destroyed and `litigation is filed the next day, that's great ... because ... we followed our own policy. And whatever there was that might have been of interest to somebody is gone and is irretrievable.'" On Oct. 12, Temple's e-mail reminded the audit team that it "will be helpful to make sure that we have complied with the policy," the memo said.
On Oct. 23, after the SEC made initial contacts with Enron, Duncan called staff meetings in Houston about the document policy, the memo said. Contemporaneous notes show that one meeting included "the directive `clean up -- documentation' followed by the explanation `SEC voluntary request/two suits filed, more on way,'" the memo said.
"It is possible," the memo said, "that Duncan still had this [Temple] e-mail in mind when he met with his audit staff 11 days later and urged them to take action to come into compliance with the firm's policy." Destruction of Enron documents intensified on that day, Oct. 23, with the shredding of 26 trunks of records and 24 boxes during the week, the memo said. The shredding continued the following week, although at a slower rate, and didn't stop until Nov. 8 when the SEC subpoenaed Andersen records.
In its rebuttal to the indictment, Andersen said staff in Houston shredded documents without approval from headquarters.
In testimony before a House committee in January, Temple denied she intended to prompt shredding of Enron records. "I did not instruct Mr. Duncan to shred documents," Temple said. She said she told Duncan's team "to retain the relevant documents."
NO-LIMITS PARTNERSHIP: ‘The bottom line’ is that if the US were to have a conflict with China or Russia it would likely open up a second front with the other, a US senator said Beijing and Moscow could cooperate in a conflict over Taiwan, the top US intelligence chief told the US Senate this week. “We see China and Russia, for the first time, exercising together in relation to Taiwan and recognizing that this is a place where China definitely wants Russia to be working with them, and we see no reason why they wouldn’t,” US Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines told a US Senate Committee on Armed Services hearing on Thursday. US Senator Mike Rounds asked Haines about such a potential scenario. He also asked US Defense Intelligence Agency Director Lieutenant General Jeffrey Kruse
NOVEL METHODS: The PLA has adopted new approaches and recently conducted three combat readiness drills at night which included aircraft and ships, an official said Taiwan is monitoring China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) exercises for changes in their size or pattern as the nation prepares for president-elect William Lai’s (賴清德) inauguration on May 20, National Security Bureau (NSB) Director-General Tsai Ming-yen (蔡明彥) said yesterday. Tsai made the comment at a meeting of the Legislative Yuan’s Foreign Affairs and National Defense Committee, in response to Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Wang Ting-yu’s (王定宇) questions. China continues to employ a carrot-and-stick approach, in which it applies pressure with “gray zone” tactics, while attempting to entice Taiwanese with perks, Tsai said. These actions aim to help Beijing look like it has
China’s intrusive and territorial claims in the Indo-Pacific region are “illegal, coercive, aggressive and deceptive,” new US Indo-Pacific Commander Admiral Samuel Paparo said on Friday, adding that he would continue working with allies and partners to keep the area free and open. Paparo made the remarks at a change-of-command ceremony at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam in Hawaii, where he took over the command from Admiral John Aquilino. “Our world faces a complex problem set in the troubling actions of the People’s Republic of China [PRC] and its rapid buildup of forces. We must be ready to answer the PRC’s increasingly intrusive and
INSPIRING: Taiwan has been a model in the Asia-Pacific region with its democratic transition, free and fair elections and open society, the vice president-elect said Taiwan can play a leadership role in the Asia-Pacific region, vice president-elect Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) told a forum in Taipei yesterday, highlighting the nation’s resilience in the face of geopolitical challenges. “Not only can Taiwan help, but Taiwan can lead ... not only can Taiwan play a leadership role, but Taiwan’s leadership is important to the world,” Hsiao told the annual forum hosted by the Center for Asia-Pacific Resilience and Innovation think tank. Hsiao thanked Taiwan’s international friends for their long-term support, citing the example of US President Joe Biden last month signing into law a bill to provide aid to Taiwan,