If the creative geniuses behind Dallas and Dynasty ever devise a Silicon Valley soap opera, the HP-Compaq drama now playing out in corporate boardrooms would provide a perfect plot.
The battle over the largest high-tech merger in history has all the ingredients of a blockbuster -- compelling characters with suspect motives locked in fateful battle, huge fortunes to be won or lost, fantastic empires to rise or fall, a decisive clash between tradition and modernity, and the dramatic stockholder referendum that will decide everything is too close to call.
On Thursday, just days before the decisive March 19 and 20 shareholder vote on the US$22 billion merger of Hewlett Packard and Compaq, both sides were proclaiming themselves confident of victory as they moved to shore up critical support from institutional shareholders.
At stake are the futures of two of the most venerable brands in the technology world -- once mighty companies that were hammered hard in the tech slowdown, which highlighted their vulnerability to fast-changing economic and technological conditions.
Both companies have been outclassed in PC retailing by Dell, which has managed to keep prices low and profits high with an innovative supply and manufacturing chain. IBM is easily more powerful in the lucrative area of corporate services. In servers, both lag behind Sun Microsystems, and in software neither company is anything more than a bit player.
Whatever strength HP has is largely reliant on its printing and imaging business, a somewhat dowdy arena for a high-tech giant in this digital age, especially since so much of the revenue relies on selling nothing more glamourous than ink cartridges.
The deal is the love child of the most powerful woman in American business, HP chief executive Carly Fiorina, whose mix of media savvy soundbites, new age business models and ruthless commitment to reorganization has made her a heroine to some but an evil schemer to others. She has found a willing partner in Michael Capellas, the bookish head of Compaq; both chief executives stand to make US$115 million if the deal goes through.
Fiorina claims that the merger, though risky, is the only way to save HP's stature as a leading technology company. It will help the new company cut costs and offer more products and services, catapulting it to a position from which it will be well able to launch credible challenges to Dell, IBM and other industry leaders.
The opposition is led by the Hewlett and Packard families -- descendants of the legendary duo who founded the company in a garage in the late 1930s and laid the foundations of Silicon Valley. The family still control 18 percent of HP's voting stock.
Walter Hewlett, the academic, musician and long-time board member, has rallied opposition to the deal, claiming that by diluting the power of HP's cash cow, the imaging and printing division, the merger could prove disastrous. He also notes that previous high-tech mergers have all encountered problems -- and none compared in scope to the challenge of integrating a combined work force of 145,000 employees in 160 countries.
He argues that a majority of HP workers oppose the deal, that the merger will require 15,000 lay offs, and that it is a betrayal of the benevolent corporate management culture that has become known as the HP way.
An estimated US$100 million has already been spent by the opposing sides in their lobbying and advertising efforts -- and each can claim significant victories in winning the approval of influential institutional investors.
But whatever the outcome, in these times of Enron-esque corporate scandal, the bitterly fought public debate is in itself laudable to some observers.
"Every employee, investor and client now knows what is on the table, thanks to the feverish sales jobs that Fiorina and Hewlett have mounted," the San Francisco Chronicle wrote recently.
NO-LIMITS PARTNERSHIP: ‘The bottom line’ is that if the US were to have a conflict with China or Russia it would likely open up a second front with the other, a US senator said Beijing and Moscow could cooperate in a conflict over Taiwan, the top US intelligence chief told the US Senate this week. “We see China and Russia, for the first time, exercising together in relation to Taiwan and recognizing that this is a place where China definitely wants Russia to be working with them, and we see no reason why they wouldn’t,” US Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines told a US Senate Committee on Armed Services hearing on Thursday. US Senator Mike Rounds asked Haines about such a potential scenario. He also asked US Defense Intelligence Agency Director Lieutenant General Jeffrey Kruse
INSPIRING: Taiwan has been a model in the Asia-Pacific region with its democratic transition, free and fair elections and open society, the vice president-elect said Taiwan can play a leadership role in the Asia-Pacific region, vice president-elect Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) told a forum in Taipei yesterday, highlighting the nation’s resilience in the face of geopolitical challenges. “Not only can Taiwan help, but Taiwan can lead ... not only can Taiwan play a leadership role, but Taiwan’s leadership is important to the world,” Hsiao told the annual forum hosted by the Center for Asia-Pacific Resilience and Innovation think tank. Hsiao thanked Taiwan’s international friends for their long-term support, citing the example of US President Joe Biden last month signing into law a bill to provide aid to Taiwan,
China’s intrusive and territorial claims in the Indo-Pacific region are “illegal, coercive, aggressive and deceptive,” new US Indo-Pacific Commander Admiral Samuel Paparo said on Friday, adding that he would continue working with allies and partners to keep the area free and open. Paparo made the remarks at a change-of-command ceremony at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam in Hawaii, where he took over the command from Admiral John Aquilino. “Our world faces a complex problem set in the troubling actions of the People’s Republic of China [PRC] and its rapid buildup of forces. We must be ready to answer the PRC’s increasingly intrusive and
STATE OF THE NATION: The legislature should invite the president to deliver an address every year, the TPP said, adding that Lai should also have to answer legislators’ questions The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) yesterday proposed inviting president-elect William Lai (賴清德) to make a historic first state of the nation address at the legislature following his inauguration on May 20. Lai is expected to face many domestic and international challenges, and should clarify his intended policies with the public’s representatives, KMT caucus secretary-general Hung Meng-kai (洪孟楷) said when making the proposal at a meeting of the legislature’s Procedure Committee. The committee voted to add the item to the agenda for Friday, along with another similar proposal put forward by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP). The invitation is in line with Article 15-2