When Oy Online Solutions Ltd discovered that a flaw in Microsoft's Internet Explorer could let hackers steal private user information from Web files known as "cookies," the Finnish company faced a difficult decision.
Should it whisper the news to Microsoft so the software giant could fix the problem? Or should it announce the so-called "bug" to the world so Explorer users could protect themselves before a hacker discovered the same vulnerability?
This dilemma has intensified recently, with Microsoft promoting a campaign to persuade security companies to keep quiet for a month when a potentially damaging flaw in software is found.
PHOTO: AP
Some security experts are skeptical of Microsoft's motives -- and the campaign itself.
The company argues that devastating computer worms such as Code Red and Nimda were unleashed by hackers who learned details of Microsoft vulnerabilities on the Web -- then picked up "exploit tools" -- blueprints for how to exploit the flaws.
"For a very long time there has been an argument about whether releasing exploit tools is helpful or harmful, but it's largely been a theoretical discussion," said Scott Culp, who manages Microsoft's company's security response center. "We've now got proof."
Microsoft's campaign won the support of five security companies at the "Trusted Computing" forum it hosted on its campus here last week. But many other computer experts say the concept is unlikely to gain momentum.
They contend that keeping flaws quiet would be more damaging to online security -- even if announcing details sometimes plays into the hands of malevolent hackers.
For example, Oy Online Solutions at first consulted with Microsoft but ultimately opted to disclose details of the Internet Explorer bug on Nov. 9. The security company said Microsoft was taking too long to make a patch that could fix the problem, leaving millions of users at risk.
Opponents of Microsoft's stance say such "full disclosure" is the only way system administrators can be sure that a patch successfully closes a breach in security -- and the only way consumers can take proper precautions.
"Full disclosure is a necessary evil. I don't think anybody likes it, even the advocates of it, simply because we know what the results are," said Elias Levy, chief technology officer of Security Focus Inc. The company, based in San Mateo, California, hosts Bugtraq, a Web forum devoted to programming errors such as the Internet Explorer flaw.
Some critics believe Microsoft's ulterior goal is to improve its image by quashing news of its products' failings.
Microsoft put out 60 patches to fix security problems in 1999, 100 last year and 55 this year. Some of the flaws have been in such important programs as Windows XP and Microsoft's Internet server software, known as IIS. After Nimda and Code Red attacked holes in IIS, an influential Gartner analyst advised clients to look for alternatives.
"They don't take security seriously. They treat security as a public relations problem," said Bruce Schneier, chief technical officer of Counterpane Technologies Inc, an online security services company. "It's much easier to hide the information than to fix the problem. That's their motivation here."
Just about every computer program in the world has defects. For years, computer scientists followed a protocol of "bug secrecy," notifying only the programmers that their work needed to be fixed. But that offered little incentive to completely fix problems or alert customers.
By the early 1990s, "you could literally break into every single computer on the Internet ... because security wasn't taken seriously," Levy said.
So researchers began publicizing flaws they discovered -- and releasing detailed information, including in some cases tools that could be used to exploit the flaw, so companies could not dismiss the findings as theoretical or inaccurate.
Now Microsoft's Culp believes the pendulum has swung too far, creating what he calls "information anarchy." A proposal developed at Trusted Computing calls for researchers to be careful "not to disclose details that can be directly used to exploit the vulnerability." If a software vendor fails to fix a problem within 30 days, more details could be disseminated. Many bugs are fixed well within 30 days.
"We're not saying full disclosure goes away -- we're saying, is there a responsible way to provide this information, to minimize its ability to be a hacker tool?" said Chris Klaus, founder of Atlanta-based Internet Security Systems Inc, which is pushing for the new standard.
Klaus dismissed the claim that Microsoft just wants to cover up its bug problems, and said those who want to publicize vulnerabilities are interested mainly in attracting attention to themselves.
"Our priority is to help the customer, and I think this thing solves that," Klaus said.
"Whether it helps or hurts Microsoft is not the intention of the security group."
NO-LIMITS PARTNERSHIP: ‘The bottom line’ is that if the US were to have a conflict with China or Russia it would likely open up a second front with the other, a US senator said Beijing and Moscow could cooperate in a conflict over Taiwan, the top US intelligence chief told the US Senate this week. “We see China and Russia, for the first time, exercising together in relation to Taiwan and recognizing that this is a place where China definitely wants Russia to be working with them, and we see no reason why they wouldn’t,” US Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines told a US Senate Committee on Armed Services hearing on Thursday. US Senator Mike Rounds asked Haines about such a potential scenario. He also asked US Defense Intelligence Agency Director Lieutenant General Jeffrey Kruse
INSPIRING: Taiwan has been a model in the Asia-Pacific region with its democratic transition, free and fair elections and open society, the vice president-elect said Taiwan can play a leadership role in the Asia-Pacific region, vice president-elect Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) told a forum in Taipei yesterday, highlighting the nation’s resilience in the face of geopolitical challenges. “Not only can Taiwan help, but Taiwan can lead ... not only can Taiwan play a leadership role, but Taiwan’s leadership is important to the world,” Hsiao told the annual forum hosted by the Center for Asia-Pacific Resilience and Innovation think tank. Hsiao thanked Taiwan’s international friends for their long-term support, citing the example of US President Joe Biden last month signing into law a bill to provide aid to Taiwan,
China’s intrusive and territorial claims in the Indo-Pacific region are “illegal, coercive, aggressive and deceptive,” new US Indo-Pacific Commander Admiral Samuel Paparo said on Friday, adding that he would continue working with allies and partners to keep the area free and open. Paparo made the remarks at a change-of-command ceremony at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam in Hawaii, where he took over the command from Admiral John Aquilino. “Our world faces a complex problem set in the troubling actions of the People’s Republic of China [PRC] and its rapid buildup of forces. We must be ready to answer the PRC’s increasingly intrusive and
STATE OF THE NATION: The legislature should invite the president to deliver an address every year, the TPP said, adding that Lai should also have to answer legislators’ questions The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) yesterday proposed inviting president-elect William Lai (賴清德) to make a historic first state of the nation address at the legislature following his inauguration on May 20. Lai is expected to face many domestic and international challenges, and should clarify his intended policies with the public’s representatives, KMT caucus secretary-general Hung Meng-kai (洪孟楷) said when making the proposal at a meeting of the legislature’s Procedure Committee. The committee voted to add the item to the agenda for Friday, along with another similar proposal put forward by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP). The invitation is in line with Article 15-2