Calls for US policymakers to speed the rollout of broadband-speed Internet access to American homes and businesses have gained some new weight since the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.
With the already battered telecommunications industry seemingly thrown into a prolonged slump, the argument goes, a concerted national effort to boost broadband could be the best elixir to get telecom, and maybe the whole economy, growing again.
Businesses disrupted by air-travel restrictions and anthrax scares -- and in lower Manhattan, the literal destruction of their offices -- have found that enabling employees to work from home can be a crucial contingency plan for coping with disaster, terror-related or otherwise. That calls for more broadband, the high-speed "always on" Web connections provided by cable modems, digital subscriber lines (DSL), or wireless and satellite technology, because telecommuting by dial-up modem is few people's idea of productivity.
PHOTO: NY TIMES
Old arguments
At the same time, Sept. 11 crystallized some old arguments. For a nation grappling with how to move forward and foster prosperity, many say, "universal broadband" could be a powerful stimulus to the 21st century economy as the transcontinental railroads, rural electrification, or interstate highway construction of decades past.
"Technology got the economy going," said Isadore T. Katz, a former Massachusetts telecom regulation analyst who is now president of Lightchip, a Salem, New Hampshire, optical-networking manufacturer. "What can revive the economy? Put telecom back on its feet again."
Katz thinks policymakers should take a serious look at a "national broadband bill" with subsidies funded from the same kinds of "universal service" fees that subsidize rural phone service (Companies like his ultimately could benefit).
At the same time, however, other analysts warn that a government effort to promote broadband is fraught with perils, including misdirected and wasted subsidies and tax breaks.
In a speech last Friday, Michael K. Powell, the chairman of the Federal Communications Commission, said the problem does not seem to be that Americans can't get broadband -- but that they won't, at least not for the prevailing US$50 a month. Citing studies by J.P. Morgan and others, Powell said nearly three-quarters of all US households have access to cable modems, and another 45 percent can get phone-based digital subscriber lines. But only 12 percent, or just under 8 million households, have signed up so far, according to Jupiter Media Metrix.
"We all want some broadband. There also is some angst that it is not here, or that it is not coming fast enough," Powell said. But in weighing whether "government actions" are needed to promote broadband, Powell said he is convinced that "the key measure is the availability of the service, not adoption rates. Consumers may not yet value the services at the prices they are being offered."
While questions of what role federal and state policy makers should play in promoting broadband are likely to be hashed out for years, it is clear that once-booming broadband growth seems to be stagnating, especially in DSL. And last week was a bad-news week for broadband: SBC Communications said it is slashing capital spending next year by 20 percent, with most of the cuts in its "Project Pronto" effort to bring DSL to the last 40 percent of its service area. SBC squarely blamed federal regulations for the cuts.
AT&T Wireless said it will wind down its "fixed wireless" broadband networks that bring high-speed access to nine mostly Western US cities, taking a US$1.3 billion charge, because it has concluded the systems will take too much investment to reach profitability.
Sprint abandoned its ION (integrated on-demand network) project that promised a one-wire voice and broadband connection for homes and businesses, as it slashed 6,000 jobs.
As of last summer, according to Jupiter, cable modems accounted for 5.5 million, or 70 percent, of the broadband lines in service, with DSL a distant second at 2.2 million. Most major phone companies reported slowing growth rates for DSL last summer. SBC and Verizon have been particularly vocal recently in complaining that regulation is discouraging them from expanding the availability of DSL.
Baby Bell DSL competitors have gone out of business, including the Boston area's Digital Broadband Communications and HarvardNet, saying they could not survive depending on the Bells for their "last mile" connection. But Baby Bells still complain that they are forced to give rivals access to their networks at below-market rates.
Competitors, they charge, can freeload on the billions of dollars they have to spend on upgrading copper wires for high-speed data service. Under a new "line-sharing" policy implemented by the FCC last year, Verizon Communications says it is now forced to sell access to rival DSL providers for an average of US$0.88 a month per line -- for service it typically charges US$50 a month to provide retail, according to spokeswoman Susan M. Butta.
Verizon earlier this month said it had reached the milestone of 1 million DSL lines in service, but launched a 40-percent-off deal to reach its goal of landing 200,000 to 300,000 more lines by year's end.
"We need a policy that substantially improves the incentives for people who are building networks," said Michael Boland, Verizon's senior vice president of federal legislative relations. "There's a positive benefit to the economy and the security of society from having additional broadband. But for us to really accelerate the national buildout, we have to have commercially reasonable [network rental] rates that fairly compensate the people who make the investment."
Among broadband bills pending on Capitol Hill are a measure proposed by US representatives Billy Tauzin, Republican of Louisiana, and John Dingell, Democrat of Michigan, that has been widely attacked as a giveaway to the Baby Bells because it would let them into the long-distance data market even before they meet pro-competition standards to get state-by-state approval for long distance.
Senator John F. Kerry, the Massachusetts Democrat, last year proposed tax credits for companies building super-high-speed network links. James A. Dolce Jr., chief executive of Westford-based Unisphere Networks, which makes DSL support equipment that has been bought by the national phone companies in Germany and South Korea, as well as AT&T and dozens of international carriers, said he is struck by how much stronger government-backed DSL deployment efforts are outside of the US.
South Korea already has nearly as many DSL lines in service as the whole US, and Korean officials last week launched a US$15 billion public-private effort to bring 20-megabit-per-second service to 84 percent of Korean households within four years.
"It's almost sacrilegious to say this, but in some cases, monopolies do work," particularly when it comes to rolling out broadband, Dolce said.
"I wouldn't say the government ought to go give SBC money to deploy DSL," he said, "but it's clear that the [1996] telecom act started out with good intentions but hasn't worked" and needs to be radically overhauled to create better incentives for "incumbent carriers" to keep building out their networks.
Acceleration
Kristin Rauschenbach, president of Maynard-based PhotonEx, a heavily funded start-up developing the next generation of ultra-high-speed optical communications gear, said accelerating broadband rollouts would be crucial to reviving the long-haul network carriers and their equipment vendors.
One common diagnosis of the telecom sector's deep woes is that carriers spent heavily building up the "core" of their networks, including transcontinental fiber optic lines, way ahead of growth in metropolitan traffic, including broadband.
"If you can open up the metro [networks], you can load up the core and get the core growing again," she said.
But, Rauschenbach said, it will be a choppy process of finding the services that drive consumer interest in getting broadband, while mass deployment of services that use heavy bandwidth -- such as movies and music on demand and rich entertainment -- will depend on broadband becoming more widely available and used.
"It's fits and starts. It's chicken and egg, and it takes 10 years to play out," Rauschenbach said. However, US Representative Edward J. Markey, the ranking Democrat on the House telecommunications subcommittee, said he has an easy solution for companies complaining about slow adoption of broadband services: Cut your prices.
"People aren't subscribing," Markey said. "The question is: Why? I believe it's largely because the price is too high." Markey said all research he has seen indicates that US$30 a month is the key "price point" at which millions of people who could get broadband would.
Most providers, including Verizon and AT&T Broadband locally, bumped typical household prices to US$50 from US$40 last summer.
Markey said the focus should be to promote even more competition, not strengthen the financial hand of the phone giants.
And Stephen Adams, acting executive director of the Pioneer Institute, a market-oriented think tank in Boston, said he fears that all a new tax incentive or subsidy proposal from Capitol Hill would do is "get everybody to stop their rollout, because everybody would wait to get the incentive. It would just stop it dead in its tracks. The best thing to do is to make sure the market works."
Massachusetts is ahead of most parts of the country in broadband deployment. Verizon says 2.3 million of its 4.7 million phone lines in the state can support DSL, just under half, above the national average of about 40 percent. AT&T Broadband offers high-speed cable modem access to 1.7 million Bay State homes, about 75 percent of its territory, and is launching a new, business-oriented cable modem service in 33 Boston suburbs this week.
Local efforts
Spokesman Rick Jenkinson said the company expects to boost that to over 90 percent within 12 months after broadband gaps are filled in areas including Boston and former Cablevision-served suburbs, Springfield, the Cape Cod communities of Orleans and Brewster, and smaller towns in the upper Pioneer Valley. "We've been deploying and spending that money with no tax incentives," Jenkinson said.
Likewise, even as fixed-wireless broadband has proven to be a financial disaster for companies such as now-bankrupt Teligent and Winstar, some small local companies are pressing ahead with wireless broadband here, vowing not to make the mistake of building a network far ahead of landing customers.
At the state level, the Massachusetts Technology Collaborative, a quasi-public state agency based in Westborough, has decided the best role it can play is in promoting "aggregation," or identifying and assembling groups of businesses and organizations that want broadband in unserved areas of the state to entice vendors.
In Berkshire County, the group helped back an effort that has led Global Crossing and Springfield-based Equal Access Networks to begin installing broadband connections at a fraction of the cost of Verizon lines.
A similar effort in Franklin and Hampshire counties got a huge boost through commitments from four area colleges (Amherst, Hampshire, Mount Holyoke and Smith) to use the network.
While still grappling with whether tax breaks, subsidies, or regulatory changes are needed, the collaborative's Tom Hubbard said "aggregation projects can help fill the gaps."
He said this is especially true if state government begins using its leverage in negotiating telecom service contracts for offices in remote corners of the state as vehicles for unserved businesses and organizations to get broadband.
NO HUMAN ERROR: After the incident, the Coast Guard Administration said it would obtain uncrewed aerial vehicles and vessels to boost its detection capacity Authorities would improve border control to prevent unlawful entry into Taiwan’s waters and safeguard national security, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday after a Chinese man reached the nation’s coast on an inflatable boat, saying he “defected to freedom.” The man was found on a rubber boat when he was about to set foot on Taiwan at the estuary of Houkeng River (後坑溪) near Taiping Borough (太平) in New Taipei City’s Linkou District (林口), authorities said. The Coast Guard Administration’s (CGA) northern branch said it received a report at 6:30am yesterday morning from the New Taipei City Fire Department about a
IN BEIJING’S FAVOR: A China Coast Guard spokesperson said that the Chinese maritime police would continue to carry out law enforcement activities in waters it claims The Philippines withdrew its coast guard vessel from a South China Sea shoal that has recently been at the center of tensions with Beijing. BRP Teresa Magbanua “was compelled to return to port” from Sabina Shoal (Xianbin Shoal, 仙濱暗沙) due to bad weather, depleted supplies and the need to evacuate personnel requiring medical care, the Philippine Coast Guard (PCG) spokesman Jay Tarriela said yesterday in a post on X. The Philippine vessel “will be in tiptop shape to resume her mission” after it has been resupplied and repaired, Philippine Executive Secretary Lucas Bersamin, who heads the nation’s maritime council, said
CHINA POLICY: At the seventh US-EU Dialogue on China, the two sides issued strong support for Taiwan and condemned China’s actions in the South China Sea The US and EU issued a joint statement on Wednesday supporting Taiwan’s international participation, notably omitting the “one China” policy in a departure from previous similar statements, following high-level talks on China and the Indo-Pacific region. The statement also urged China to show restraint in the Taiwan Strait. US Deputy Secretary of State Kurt Campbell and European External Action Service Secretary-General Stefano Sannino cochaired the seventh US-EU Dialogue on China and the sixth US-EU Indo-Pacific Consultations from Monday to Tuesday. Since the Indo-Pacific consultations were launched in 2021, references to the “one China” policy have appeared in every statement apart from the
More than 500 people on Saturday marched in New York in support of Taiwan’s entry to the UN, significantly more people than previous years. The march, coinciding with the ongoing 79th session of the UN General Assembly, comes close on the heels of growing international discourse regarding the meaning of UN Resolution 2758. Resolution 2758, adopted by the UN General Assembly in 1971, recognizes the People’s Republic of China (PRC) as the “only lawful representative of China.” It resulted in the Republic of China (ROC) losing its seat at the UN to the PRC. Taiwan has since been excluded from