As bad as the news might have been in the September account statement from your broker, the best thing to do now is forget it. No one should shift to a new adviser or strategy based on one sad month of performance.
I reached that conclusion after studying the performance of investment newsletters during and after other sharply negative months of past decades. Almost always investors chasing good performance then would have regretted their decisions.
A spectacular illustration of the pattern comes from the market crash of Oct. 1987, which was far worse for US stocks than were the events of Sept. 11 this year. In fact, the combined value of the country's equities fell 22.8 percent in October 1987, versus 9 percent last month.
Nevertheless, as a group, the newsletters that performed the best during October 1987 -- which, on balance, were aggressively bearish -- have been among the poorest performers over the years since.
Consider the top 10 letters from that month, ranked by performance, among those monitored by The Hulbert Financial Digest. Over the next 14 years, those 10 letters have produced an average annualized gain of just 4.5 percent, or just over one-third the 12.9 percent registered by the Wilshire 5000. Even 90-day Treasury bills have done better, at 5.3 percent a year, on average. Now consider the 10 newsletters with the worst performances in Oct. 1987. Six of them have since outperformed the Wilshire 5000. And as a group, those 10 have produced an annualized gain of 10.2 percent, less than that of the Wilshire 5000 but more than double the average return of the 10 best-performing letters that month.
You may object that the results reflect little more than the bull market over most of the last 14 years. Yet the market's performance could well have turned out differently in the wake of 1987's Black Monday. There was no guarantee that stocks would not enter a long-term bear market, and if they had, the pattern might have been different: the newsletters with the best subsequent performances could have been among those with the best gains in Oct. 1987.
But my conclusion still holds. My argument is based on performance over the last 14 years, and bear markets hardly ever last that long. Since 1802, there have been 186 different, though overlapping, 14-year periods, and in fewer than 4 percent of them have stocks failed to produce a positive real return, according Jeremy Siegel, a professor at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.
If the future is like the past, the probability is more than 96 percent that the advisers with the best returns last month, generally market bears, will be poor long-term bets. Even in the unlikely event that stocks decline over the next 14 years, the top performers last month would still be poor bets.
That is because the best advisers over a period as short as one month tend to be those that have incurred the greatest risk. Regardless of the market's overall direction, it is most unlikely that such advisers can make enough money to overcome the huge losses that their high risk inevitably brings when they misstep -- something that even the best advisers do occasionally.
A more intelligent bet is on advisers with the best long-term records. Only when track records are measured over many years does past performance become even a part guide to the future.
What are the best long-term performers saying now? Though some of them are bearish, on balance they are recommending healthy allocations to equities. Among the 10 letters with the best market-timing performances in the last decade, the current recommended stock allocation is 52 percent. You may find it difficult to swallow such a heavy bet on stocks today. But I am confident that, 14 years from now, you will be much happier having followed the lead of these top performers than that of the aggressively bearish letters that enjoyed their day in the sun during September.
NO-LIMITS PARTNERSHIP: ‘The bottom line’ is that if the US were to have a conflict with China or Russia it would likely open up a second front with the other, a US senator said Beijing and Moscow could cooperate in a conflict over Taiwan, the top US intelligence chief told the US Senate this week. “We see China and Russia, for the first time, exercising together in relation to Taiwan and recognizing that this is a place where China definitely wants Russia to be working with them, and we see no reason why they wouldn’t,” US Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines told a US Senate Committee on Armed Services hearing on Thursday. US Senator Mike Rounds asked Haines about such a potential scenario. He also asked US Defense Intelligence Agency Director Lieutenant General Jeffrey Kruse
INSPIRING: Taiwan has been a model in the Asia-Pacific region with its democratic transition, free and fair elections and open society, the vice president-elect said Taiwan can play a leadership role in the Asia-Pacific region, vice president-elect Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) told a forum in Taipei yesterday, highlighting the nation’s resilience in the face of geopolitical challenges. “Not only can Taiwan help, but Taiwan can lead ... not only can Taiwan play a leadership role, but Taiwan’s leadership is important to the world,” Hsiao told the annual forum hosted by the Center for Asia-Pacific Resilience and Innovation think tank. Hsiao thanked Taiwan’s international friends for their long-term support, citing the example of US President Joe Biden last month signing into law a bill to provide aid to Taiwan,
China’s intrusive and territorial claims in the Indo-Pacific region are “illegal, coercive, aggressive and deceptive,” new US Indo-Pacific Commander Admiral Samuel Paparo said on Friday, adding that he would continue working with allies and partners to keep the area free and open. Paparo made the remarks at a change-of-command ceremony at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam in Hawaii, where he took over the command from Admiral John Aquilino. “Our world faces a complex problem set in the troubling actions of the People’s Republic of China [PRC] and its rapid buildup of forces. We must be ready to answer the PRC’s increasingly intrusive and
STATE OF THE NATION: The legislature should invite the president to deliver an address every year, the TPP said, adding that Lai should also have to answer legislators’ questions The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) yesterday proposed inviting president-elect William Lai (賴清德) to make a historic first state of the nation address at the legislature following his inauguration on May 20. Lai is expected to face many domestic and international challenges, and should clarify his intended policies with the public’s representatives, KMT caucus secretary-general Hung Meng-kai (洪孟楷) said when making the proposal at a meeting of the legislature’s Procedure Committee. The committee voted to add the item to the agenda for Friday, along with another similar proposal put forward by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP). The invitation is in line with Article 15-2