Leading privacy watchdog groups lashed out at the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) for siding with the advertising industry as part of a government initiative to update consumer-data protections.
The organizations — which include the Consumer Federation of America and the Electronic Frontier Foundation — on Monday told FTC Chairman Joe Simons in a letter that the agency relied on a “self-serving study” by the ad industry to warn against a policy in which consumers are opted out of online advertising by default.
“Instead of squarely defending the privacy rights of consumers it really capitulates to a pro-industry position using industry research,” said Jeff Chester, executive director of the Center for Digital Democracy, which joined the letter. “It removes what little credibility the FTC under Chairman Simons has.”
Photo: AFP
The FTC should be replaced as the agency responsible for protecting consumer privacy, Chester said.
“They’re incapable of standing up for the public and taking on these powerful interests,” he said. “We need a real watchdog, not a lapdog.”
Simons has vowed to make privacy and data security an enforcement priority and has called for legislation that would expand the agency’s authority.
Simons is leading the commission as it investigates Facebook Inc for possibly violating a privacy order imposed in 2011.
The FTC did not respond to a request for comment about the privacy groups’ criticism.
Early this month, the FTC submitted a comment to an arm of the US Department of Commerce as part of an initiative by US President Donald Trump’s administration to gather public input on ways to protect consumer privacy and data online.
The agency said giving consumers control over collection and use of their data online could be beneficial, but could also be costly to implement and might have “unintended consequences.”
“For example, if consumers were opted out of online advertisements by default [with the choice of opting in], the likely result would include the loss of advertising-funded online content,” the FTC said.
That comment drew the ire of the privacy watchdog groups because, they say, the FTC based it on a survey commissioned by the Digital Advertising Alliance, which is made up of advertising associations.
Participating companies include some of the world’s biggest companies, such as Amazon.com Inc, Alphabet Inc’s Google, General Motors Co and Walmart Inc.
“As federal privacy legislation is contemplated, the FTC should be a strong voice for advancing Americans’ privacy interests in a meaningful way, not parroting the advertising industry’s talking points,” said Susan Grant, director of consumer protection and privacy at the Consumer Federation of America.
A spokesman for the Digital Advertising Alliance declined to immediately comment.
CHIP RACE: Three years of overbroad export controls drove foreign competitors to pursue their own AI chips, and ‘cost US taxpayers billions of dollars,’ Nvidia said China has figured out the US strategy for allowing it to buy Nvidia Corp’s H200s and is rejecting the artificial intelligence (AI) chip in favor of domestically developed semiconductors, White House AI adviser David Sacks said, citing news reports. US President Donald Trump on Monday said that he would allow shipments of Nvidia’s H200 chips to China, part of an administration effort backed by Sacks to challenge Chinese tech champions such as Huawei Technologies Co (華為) by bringing US competition to their home market. On Friday, Sacks signaled that he was uncertain about whether that approach would work. “They’re rejecting our chips,” Sacks
Taiwan’s exports soared 56 percent year-on-year to an all-time high of US$64.05 billion last month, propelled by surging global demand for artificial intelligence (AI), high-performance computing and cloud service infrastructure, the Ministry of Finance said yesterday. Department of Statistics Director-General Beatrice Tsai (蔡美娜) called the figure an unexpected upside surprise, citing a wave of technology orders from overseas customers alongside the usual year-end shopping season for technology products. Growth is likely to remain strong this month, she said, projecting a 40 percent to 45 percent expansion on an annual basis. The outperformance could prompt the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and
NATIONAL SECURITY: Intel’s testing of ACM tools despite US government control ‘highlights egregious gaps in US technology protection policies,’ a former official said Chipmaker Intel Corp has tested chipmaking tools this year from a toolmaker with deep roots in China and two overseas units that were targeted by US sanctions, according to two sources with direct knowledge of the matter. Intel, which fended off calls for its CEO’s resignation from US President Donald Trump in August over his alleged ties to China, got the tools from ACM Research Inc, a Fremont, California-based producer of chipmaking equipment. Two of ACM’s units, based in Shanghai and South Korea, were among a number of firms barred last year from receiving US technology over claims they have
BARRIERS: Gudeng’s chairman said it was unlikely that the US could replicate Taiwan’s science parks in Arizona, given its strict immigration policies and cultural differences Gudeng Precision Industrial Co (家登), which supplies wafer pods to the world’s major semiconductor firms, yesterday said it is in no rush to set up production in the US due to high costs. The company supplies its customers through a warehouse in Arizona jointly operated by TSS Holdings Ltd (德鑫控股), a joint holding of Gudeng and 17 Taiwanese firms in the semiconductor supply chain, including specialty plastic compounds producer Nytex Composites Co (耐特) and automated material handling system supplier Symtek Automation Asia Co (迅得). While the company has long been exploring the feasibility of setting up production in the US to address
RSS