Qualcomm Inc chief executive Steven Mollenkopf on Monday was the butt of several jokes during a discussion forum to celebrate the 30th anniversary of the founding of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電).
However, those enjoying sticking the boot in would do well to reflect upon the fairness of the NT$23.4 billion (US$773 million) fine the Fair Trade Commission handed the US chipmaker earlier this month.
If the aftermath of the decision is not handled appropriately, it could turn into a lose-lose situation for all concerned.
The commission’s investigation into Qualcomm, presided over by Fair Trade Commission Chairwoman Huang Mei-ying (黃美瑛), has been denounced for containing several flaws, which has damaged the reputation of the antitrust body.
First, prior to the investigation, the South Korean Fair Trade Commission had also conducted a probe of Qualcomm and issued its verdict last year. During the course of the investigation, the antitrust body held seven legislative hearings.
If the local commission had held similar legislative hearings during its investigation, it would have allowed other government agencies, including the Ministry of Finance, to present their views on the case and the commission would not have made such a fool of itself following its announcement of the ruling on Oct. 11.
Since the commission did not hold any legislative hearings, it should not have also omitted to hold either public hearings or discussion forums.
However, this seems to be customary practice for the commission based on past performance.
During the commission’s inquiry into Advanced Semiconductor Engineering Inc’s (日月光半導體) bid to acquire Siliconware Precision Industries Co (矽品精密) last year, it did hold a public hearing, but in the much more complicated Qualcomm investigation, the watchdog failed to hold a single external meeting.
The committee set up by the commission to investigate Qualcomm, which consisted of seven members, did not adhere to normal committee conventions.
Normally, when two or more committee members hold differing opinions to the other members, the committee delays coming to a decision. In the Qualcomm case, three committee members were in disagreement with the decision.
With only four members in favor of issuing a fine to the company, the committee was split almost down the middle. Despite this, Huang forced through the ruling without consideration of the consequences.
As an independent antitrust body, it is vitally important that the commission effectively regulates itself to guard against making arbitrary decisions since, due to the power it holds, its potential for inflicting damage is immense.
Fines issued by the commission must be both fair and reasonable to ensure an equitable outcome for all parties.
The secretive nature of the commission’s investigation followed by the announcement of the fine clearly demonstrates that the commission incorrectly believes that, as an independent body, it is beyond reproach and can do whatever it likes.
If the commission is unable to allay the concerns surrounding its investigation of Qualcomm, then a large question mark will hang over the organization for years.
CHIP RACE: Three years of overbroad export controls drove foreign competitors to pursue their own AI chips, and ‘cost US taxpayers billions of dollars,’ Nvidia said China has figured out the US strategy for allowing it to buy Nvidia Corp’s H200s and is rejecting the artificial intelligence (AI) chip in favor of domestically developed semiconductors, White House AI adviser David Sacks said, citing news reports. US President Donald Trump on Monday said that he would allow shipments of Nvidia’s H200 chips to China, part of an administration effort backed by Sacks to challenge Chinese tech champions such as Huawei Technologies Co (華為) by bringing US competition to their home market. On Friday, Sacks signaled that he was uncertain about whether that approach would work. “They’re rejecting our chips,” Sacks
NATIONAL SECURITY: Intel’s testing of ACM tools despite US government control ‘highlights egregious gaps in US technology protection policies,’ a former official said Chipmaker Intel Corp has tested chipmaking tools this year from a toolmaker with deep roots in China and two overseas units that were targeted by US sanctions, according to two sources with direct knowledge of the matter. Intel, which fended off calls for its CEO’s resignation from US President Donald Trump in August over his alleged ties to China, got the tools from ACM Research Inc, a Fremont, California-based producer of chipmaking equipment. Two of ACM’s units, based in Shanghai and South Korea, were among a number of firms barred last year from receiving US technology over claims they have
It is challenging to build infrastructure in much of Europe. Constrained budgets and polarized politics tend to undermine long-term projects, forcing officials to react to emergencies rather than plan for the future. Not in Austria. Today, the country is to officially open its Koralmbahn tunnel, the 5.9 billion euro (US$6.9 billion) centerpiece of a groundbreaking new railway that will eventually run from Poland’s Baltic coast to the Adriatic Sea, transforming travel within Austria and positioning the Alpine nation at the forefront of logistics in Europe. “It is Austria’s biggest socio-economic experiment in over a century,” said Eric Kirschner, an economist at Graz-based Joanneum
BUBBLE? Only a handful of companies are seeing rapid revenue growth and higher valuations, and it is not enough to call the AI trend a transformation, an analyst said Artificial intelligence (AI) is entering a more challenging phase next year as companies move beyond experimentation and begin demanding clear financial returns from a technology that has delivered big gains to only a small group of early adopters, PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) Taiwan said yesterday. Most organizations have been able to justify AI investments through cost recovery or modest efficiency gains, but few have achieved meaningful revenue growth or long-term competitive advantage, the consultancy said in its 2026 AI Business Predictions report. This growing performance gap is forcing executives to reconsider how AI is deployed across their organizations, it said. “Many companies