Banks, bonuses, tax havens and under-regulation caused the financial crisis and are the keys to reform. Not so, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) warns as the G20 takes steps in such areas.
Compromises on action to deal with symptoms, such as bonuses, rather than action on real causes could even end up doing more harm than good, the OECD said in a report and separate remarks.
The OECD said progress on new rules to strengthen the capital base of finance companies and related regulations was going in the right direction.
But, in the words of the report’s author, Adrian Blundell-Wignall, much of the focus in other areas, such as on bonuses, tackles “symptoms instead of causes” and “puts the cart before the horse.”
Instead, the focus should be on matters that are scarcely being discussed.
One of these issues is preventing the spread of failure, or “contagion,” by erecting “firewalls” within financial companies.
Another is requiring the company risk manager to be on the main board with freedom to speak out without fear of the chief executive. This would ensure that boards were fully informed and would focus more on the interests of shareholders rather than on their own incentive pay.
Among other issues named were ensuring that directors of financial companies are competent and understand their business, instead of meeting a requirement merely to have no criminal convictions as is the practice now.
Reforming national tax regimes in leading countries was also cited. This is because onshore tax incentives encourage the legal use of offshore entities and complex instruments to take best advantage of onshore tax allowances.
The OECD is a policy forum for the 30 leading industrialized economies, and participated in the G20 talks on reform of the global system.
The report said: “A widely held myth about the current crisis is that it has occurred in a regulatory vacuum.”
Although deregulation had been a factor, the crisis broke “within an overall framework of complex rules” and supervision.
Regulatory arrangements need to be updated and streamlined, the report said.
On bank bonuses, Blundell-Wignall said: “Excessive bonuses come out of excessive profits from excessive risk-taking.
“If you just cap bonuses without dealing with excessive risk, the problem is not solved. If you get the corporate rules, structures and governance right, you will deal with the bonuses,” he said. “Governments have no place sitting in the boardrooms setting wages.”
The report argued that if boardrooms came under increased pressure to work for shareholders, the budgets for bonuses would be contained. A pivotal step would be to free the chief risk officer from fear of sanction by the chief executive.
“If the chief executive loses direct control of high risk activities because of firewalls, and if the risk officer has to be a director reporting to the chairman and board, the balance of power and risk-taking changes. This is the key,” Blundell-Wignall said.
He said another central issue was the spread of damage when a financial entity in a group failed.
“The concept of contagion of risk is about the structure of companies, but it isn’t being addressed,” he warned.
Blundell-Wignall, who is deputy director of finance and enterprise affairs at the OECD, said the causes of the crisis lay with policymakers in many fields and in many countries.
“At the root of all this is public policy,” he said. “On the macro economic side, the global problem lies at the door of misaligned exchange rates.
“This is not a US or European policy matter. They have no control of this. It is mainly driven from Asia, the Middle East and parts of Latin America where they have pegged their currencies to the dollar,” he said.
The report, Reform and exit strategies, implies that the main causes of the global crisis were borrowing by governments and unduly low interest rates by central banks.
Official distortion of exchange rates then prevented markets from absorbing the global trade and savings imbalances. In the West, a social bias towards “easy money policies” led to “excess liquidity, asset bubbles and leverage.”
The report said: “The reform of global exchange rate regimes and the dollar reserve currency problem is extremely important, but is also unlikely to be achieved any time soon.”
On the fuse that blew, the US subprime home-loan market, Blundell-Wignall said the system became overloaded because of a coincidence of events in 2004.
Among these were a decision by the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to allow financial firms to pool their businesses, removing walls between risk activities. The SEC did so partly to match European rules that had permitted such arrangements for years.
Another was the “American dream” vote by Congress to push out zero asset-backed home loans to low income households.
The OECD report points to the risk that mortgage tax relief, of the type associated with subprime loans, could result in households falling into excessive debt.
Another main cause of the crisis, given little or no public attention, was national tax systems in leading economies. These unduly favor corporate risk and debt leverage and were the main force behind much-criticized structured financial instruments.
But the issue of domestic tax reform “needs to be on the long-run agenda,” Blundell-Wignall said.
The focus on bonuses “misses the point,” he said.
“By partly fixing symptoms ... you may do more damage,” Blundell-Wignall said.
Quanta Computer Inc (廣達) chairman Barry Lam (林百里) is expected to share his views about the artificial intelligence (AI) industry’s prospects during his speech at the company’s 37th anniversary ceremony, as AI servers have become a new growth engine for the equipment manufacturing service provider. Lam’s speech is much anticipated, as Quanta has risen as one of the world’s major AI server suppliers. The company reported a 30 percent year-on-year growth in consolidated revenue to NT$1.41 trillion (US$43.35 billion) last year, thanks to fast-growing demand for servers, especially those with AI capabilities. The company told investors in November last year that
Intel Corp has named Tasha Chuang (莊蓓瑜) to lead Intel Taiwan in a bid to reinforce relations between the company and its Taiwanese partners. The appointment of Chuang as general manager for Intel Taiwan takes effect on Thursday, the firm said in a statement yesterday. Chuang is to lead her team in Taiwan to pursue product development and sales growth in an effort to reinforce the company’s ties with its partners and clients, Intel said. Chuang was previously in charge of managing Intel’s ties with leading Taiwanese PC brand Asustek Computer Inc (華碩), which included helping Asustek strengthen its global businesses, the company
Taiwanese suppliers to Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (TSMC, 台積電) are expected to follow the contract chipmaker’s step to invest in the US, but their relocation may be seven to eight years away, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) said yesterday. When asked by opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Niu Hsu-ting (牛煦庭) in the legislature about growing concerns that TSMC’s huge investments in the US will prompt its suppliers to follow suit, Kuo said based on the chipmaker’s current limited production volume, it is unlikely to lead its supply chain to go there for now. “Unless TSMC completes its planned six
Power supply and electronic components maker Delta Electronics Inc (台達電) yesterday said it plans to ship its new 1 megawatt charging systems for electric trucks and buses in the first half of next year at the earliest. The new charging piles, which deliver up to 1 megawatt of charging power, are designed for heavy-duty electric vehicles, and support a maximum current of 1,500 amperes and output of 1,250 volts, Delta said in a news release. “If everything goes smoothly, we could begin shipping those new charging systems as early as in the first half of next year,” a company official said. The new