Is the economic stimulus plan of at least US$140 billion expected to come out of Washington the right medicine for an ailing US economy, or an election-year fiscal folly?
Some analysts say the plan outline proposed on Friday by President George W. Bush may be enough to help keep the world's largest economy out of recession, or at least make the anticipated downturn a mild one.
Although there is no specific plan on paper, some lawmakers and officials are pressing for tax-rebate checks of at least US$300 per taxpayer and some are calling for as much as US$800 per person or US$1,600 per household, in addition to various business tax breaks.
PHOTO: AP
Bush said the package "must be big enough to make a difference in an economy as large and dynamic as ours, which means it should be about 1 percent of GDP."
Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson said that on that basis, the package should be "in the neighborhood" of US$140 billion to US$150 billion.
Nariman Behravesh, chief economist at the research firm Global Insight, said that such a plan could help avert or minimize a potential recession for an economy buffeted by a horrific housing slump and troubled credit markets.
"It will have an effect on the economy, assuming the impact is in the second or third quarter," Behravesh said, adding: "It could prevent a recession."
James Marple, economist at TD Bank Financial Group, said Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke "gave credence to the notion that fiscal policy can be used as an effective tool to stave off a US recession" in his comments to Congress on Thursday.
"There is some historical precedence for a stimulus package at least mitigating the impacts of a recession," Marple said.
"In 2001 tax refunds of US$300 per person were sent to households across the country. A study of the program found it to be quite successful ... The rebates contributed to a rebound in consumption in the final quarter of 2001 and is one factor thought to have helped make the 2001 recession the shortest and mildest on record," he said.
Other analysts were more skeptical.
Avery Shenfeld at CIBC World Markets said the plan appears to be more political than economic.
"Americans don't mind running up their credit cards to the max and don't seem to care much if their governments do the same," he said.
"With the US economy faltering and hanging over the precipice of recession, the White House is going to pull out all stops to ensure that the economy is moving along come the first Tuesday in November," Shenfeld said.
Robert MacIntosh, chief economist for Eaton Vance Corp, said that the plans being discussed would be less effective than permanent tax changes: "I can't see handing checks to people as being effective."
"All it does is increase the deficit," MacIntosh said.
Robert Brusca at FAO Economics argued that the US economy is not yet in recession, with the most recent data from the third quarter showing solid growth.
He said that too much fiscal medicine may result in a "horror movie" scenario that brings inflation back from the dead.
"In our story, the Fed and the government are applying artificial resuscitation and intravenous feeding to encourage the recovery of the now undead patient [the economy]," Brusca said in a research note. "Where do you think that takes us? Probably to the next horror story and that one will not star growth as much as it will star inflation."
But economist Ethan Harris at Lehman Brothers said that the plan could be positive overall.
"If a recession is looming, fiscal action must be quick and tax rebates are probably the fastest way to get money into the economy," he said. "Perhaps even more important, the policy would provide a psychological boost to the economy."
WEAKER ACTIVITY: The sharpest deterioration was seen in the electronics and optical components sector, with the production index falling 13.2 points to 44.5 Taiwan’s manufacturing sector last month contracted for a second consecutive month, with the purchasing managers’ index (PMI) slipping to 48, reflecting ongoing caution over trade uncertainties, the Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research (CIER, 中華經濟研究院) said yesterday. The decline reflects growing caution among companies amid uncertainty surrounding US tariffs, semiconductor duties and automotive import levies, and it is also likely linked to fading front-loading activity, CIER president Lien Hsien-ming (連賢明) said. “Some clients have started shifting orders to Southeast Asian countries where tariff regimes are already clear,” Lien told a news conference. Firms across the supply chain are also lowering stock levels to mitigate
Six Taiwanese companies, including contract chipmaker Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (TSMC), made the 2025 Fortune Global 500 list of the world’s largest firms by revenue. In a report published by New York-based Fortune magazine on Tuesday, Hon Hai Precision Industry Co. (better known as Foxconn) ranked highest among Taiwanese firms, placing 28th with revenue of US$213.69 billion. Up 60 spots from last year, TSMC rose 60 places to reach No. 126 with US$90.16 billion in revenue, followed by Quanta Computer Inc. at 348th, Pegatron Corp. at 461st, CPC Corp., Taiwan at 494th and Wistron Corp. at 496th. According to Fortune, the world’s
NEW PRODUCTS: MediaTek plans to roll out new products this quarter, including a flagship mobile phone chip and a GB10 chip that it is codeveloping with Nvidia Corp MediaTek Inc (聯發科) yesterday projected that revenue this quarter would dip by 7 to 13 percent to between NT$130.1 billion and NT$140 billion (US$4.38 billion and US$4.71 billion), compared with NT$150.37 billion last quarter, which it attributed to subdued front-loading demand and unfavorable foreign exchange rates. The Hsinchu-based chip designer said that the forecast factored in the negative effects of an estimated 6 percent appreciation of the New Taiwan dollar against the greenback. “As some demand has been pulled into the first half of the year and resulted in a different quarterly pattern, we expect the third quarter revenue to decline sequentially,”
DIVERSIFYING: Taiwanese investors are reassessing their preference for US dollar assets and moving toward Europe amid a global shift away from the greenback Taiwanese investors are reassessing their long-held preference for US-dollar assets, shifting their bets to Europe in the latest move by global investors away from the greenback. Taiwanese funds holding European assets have seen an influx of investments recently, pushing their combined value to NT$13.7 billion (US$461 million) as of the end of last month, the highest since 2019, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Over the first half of this year, Taiwanese investors have also poured NT$14.1 billion into Europe-focused funds based overseas, bringing total assets up to NT$134.8 billion, according to data from the Securities Investment Trust and Consulting Association (SITCA),