Hewlett-Packard Co (HP) announced a US$1.2 billion deal to buy Palm Inc, betting it can resuscitate the struggling smartphone maker to compete with the likes of Apple Inc and Research in Motion (RIM).
Analysts say this year’s third-largest US tech acquisition grants Palm’s devices global production and distribution reach, while launching the world’s top PC maker into a tech arena experiencing blistering growth.
The news on Wednesday surprised many on Wall Street, since much of the long-running takeover speculation surrounding Palm had shifted in recent weeks to focus on potential Asian bidders, such as China’s Lenovo (聯想).
An early pioneer in handheld devices, Palm once dominated the market but has since been surpassed by Apple’s iPhone and RIM’s BlackBerry.
Palm put out a new mobile operating system, the well-reviewed webOS, last year, but even that has been overshadowed by Google Inc’s Android software.
In a sign of Palm’s struggles, the money-losing company headed by Jon Rubinstein — a former Apple executive famous for developing the iPod — slashed revenue expectations for the current quarter. It said slow product sales have led to low order volumes from carriers.
Palm reported losses for each of its last two fiscal years.
Shares of Palm, 30 percent owned by Elevation Partners, jumped 27 percent to US$5.88, above HP’s US$5.70 cash offer.
HP said the deal for Palm, which both boards have approved, valued the company at US$1.2 billion including debt. Based on Palm’s latest filing, the deal values Palm’s 167.892 million shares outstanding at US$957 million.
Analysts said HP has deep pockets to invest in Palm, can expand its carrier relationships and negotiate better component pricing from existing suppliers.
HP’s foray into the fiercely contested smartphone arena may not immediately threaten Apple and RIM’s BlackBerry but may increase pressure on Nokia, Motorola and other device manufacturers now battling to expand their market share.
“Nokia will be one of the most affected players,” IDC analyst Francisco Jeronimo said. Because of a “wrong portfolio and lack of carrier support, Nokia never moved from its eighth position ... in the smartphone segment. This deal puts also pressure on Motorola and HTC (宏達電).”
Others, however, were more skeptical about HP’s ability to turn around Palm, whose Pre and Pixi phones have withered in the face of fierce competition.
“If HP wants to have a global role in the mobile space, spending US$1.2 billion in Palm is not the way. Palm has no brand outside the US, and it has no distribution outside the US,” said John Strand, chief executive of Strand Consult.
“To pay US$1.2 billion for a US-centric mobile player that’s not successful is a first-class way to destroy shareholder value. Palm has tried to move from the PDA world into the mobile world for eight years without success,” Strand said.
According to Gartner, Palm held 1.2 percent of the global smartphone market last year, compared with Nokia’s 41.1 percent, RIM’s 19.9 percent and Apple’s 14.4 percent.
Palm now expects fiscal fourth quarter revenue in the range of US$90 million to US$100 million, compared with its forecast last month that revenue would be less than US$150 million.
Todd Bradley, executive vice president of HP’s computer division, said the company plans to “invest heavily” in Palm, increasing spending on sales and marketing and research and development in the hope of spurring the developer community into writing more applications for the platform.
HP already has a smartphone, the iPaq, which runs on Microsoft’s Windows mobile platform, but the device has gained little traction in a crowded market.
Rubinstein is expected to remain with the company, HP said in a statement, adding that the acquisition would likely close during its third fiscal quarter ending July 31.
Shares of HP fell 1 percent to US$52.75 in extended trading from their New York Stock Exchange close of US$53.28.
FIVE-YEAR WINDOW? A defense institute CEO said a timeline for a potential Chinese invasion was based on expected ‘tough measures’ when Xi Jinping seeks a new term Most Taiwanese are willing to defend the nation against a Chinese attack, but the majority believe Beijing is unlikely to invade within the next five years, a poll showed yesterday. The poll carried out last month was commissioned by the Institute for National Defense and Security Research, a Taipei-based think tank, and released ahead of Double Ten National Day today, when President William Lai (賴清德) is to deliver a speech. China maintains a near-daily military presence around Taiwan and has held three rounds of war games in the past two years. CIA Director William Burns last year said that Chinese President Xi Jinping
President William Lai (賴清德) yesterday said that China has “no right to represent Taiwan,” but stressed that the nation was willing to work with Beijing on issues of mutual interest. “The Republic of China has already put down roots in Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu,” Lai said in his first Double Ten National Day address outside the Presidential Office Building in Taipei. “And the Republic of China and the People’s Republic of China [PRC] are not subordinate to each other.” “The People’s Republic of China has no right to represent Taiwan,” he said at the event marking the 113th National Day of
REACTION TO LAI: A former US official said William Lai took a step toward stability with his National Day speech and the question was how Beijing would respond US Secretary of State Antony Blinken yesterday warned China against taking any “provocative” action on Taiwan after Beijing’s reaction to President William Lai’s (賴清德) speech on Double Ten National Day on Thursday. Blinken, speaking in Laos after an ASEAN East Asia Summit, called the speech by Lai, in which he vowed to “resist annexation,” a “regular exercise.” “China should not use it in any fashion as a pretext for provocative actions,” Blinken told reporters. “On the contrary, we want to reinforce — and many other countries want to reinforce — the imperative of preserving the status quo, and neither party taking any
SPEECH IMPEDIMENT? The state department said that using routine celebrations or public remarks as a pretext for provocation would undermine peace and stability Beijing’s expected use of President William Lai’s (賴清德) Double Ten National Day speech today as a pretext for provocative measures would undermine peace and stability, the US Department of State said on Tuesday. Taiwanese officials have said that China is likely to launch military drills near Taiwan in response to Lai’s speech as a pretext to pressure the nation to accept its sovereignty claims. A state department spokesperson said it could not speculate on what China would or would not do. “However, it is worth emphasizing that using routine annual celebrations or public remarks as a pretext or excuse for provocative or coercive