Beijing will not relax its efforts to sell Chinese products overseas next year and seek a bigger share in the global market, the Chinese vice trade minister said yesterday.
China, which may have replaced Germany to be the world’s largest exporter this year, is a “big trading nation,” but not yet a “powerful trading nation,” Vice Commerce Minister Zhong Shan (鐘山) said.
“China’s exports in 2010 will grow and there’s no doubt about that,” Zhong said, declining to provide detailed forecasts.
China’s exports were hit hard by the global financial turmoil, falling 18.8 percent in the first 11 months from a year earlier.
But the market share for Chinese products has increased this year as sales from other countries have fallen even more deeply, Zhong told a forum at the University of International Business and Economics in Beijing.
Other countries have blamed China’s unofficial policy of repegging the yuan to the dollar since the summer of last year for making its products artificially competitive.
China will feel pressure on its yuan policy but will maintain “basic stability” Zhong said, in a reiteration of long-standing government policy.
He said export growth is vital for China to drive economic growth and create jobs at home.
For example, Zhong said exporting 30 million shirts benefits the Chinese economy more than exporting one Boeing 747, referring to a domestic debate over how much China should support existing labor-intensive export industries versus how much it should move up the value chain.
“Exporting 30 million shirts means we can create jobs for 10,000 people,” Zhong said.
“With the 10,000 people employed, their families, or 30,000 people, can have a well-off life,” he said.
China is under pressure from its trading partners to balance its outsize trade surplus, and Beijing has also listed trade balance as one of its key economic policy targets.
But Zhong said that does not mean a reduction in exports.
“Obama has told China to import more and export less, to save less and spend more, but what is United States doing? It is trying to expand its own exports,” Zhong said.
“I don’t want to say whether the United States is wrong or right,” he said. “But we can’t say easily that China has been exporting too much.”
Separately, Premier Wen Jiabao (溫家寶) said yesterday that China “absolutely won’t” agree to requests for the yuan to appreciate.
In a live interview with Xinhua news agency broadcast live online, Wen said a stable yuan has contributed to stability in global markets.
But Wen called for policies to curb property speculation, an indication the government is ready to tighten policies to prevent the economy from overheating.
Wen said property prices have risen too quickly in some areas and that tax and interest rates are among tools that could be used to control speculation.
China’s property prices climbed last month at the quickest pace since July last year, adding to concern that record lending may create asset bubbles in the world’s fastest-growing major economy.
Wen said in the interview that China isn’t experiencing inflation and that consumer price increases will be kept in a “reasonable range.”
“China will keep its loose stance at least in the first half of next year as inflation is expected to stay within tolerable levels,” said Shen Minggao (沈明高), chief economist for Greater China at Citigroup Inc. “There won’t be significant changes to maintain policy stability, but some industries with excess capacity have seen credit tightened.”
FIVE-YEAR WINDOW? A defense institute CEO said a timeline for a potential Chinese invasion was based on expected ‘tough measures’ when Xi Jinping seeks a new term Most Taiwanese are willing to defend the nation against a Chinese attack, but the majority believe Beijing is unlikely to invade within the next five years, a poll showed yesterday. The poll carried out last month was commissioned by the Institute for National Defense and Security Research, a Taipei-based think tank, and released ahead of Double Ten National Day today, when President William Lai (賴清德) is to deliver a speech. China maintains a near-daily military presence around Taiwan and has held three rounds of war games in the past two years. CIA Director William Burns last year said that Chinese President Xi Jinping
President William Lai (賴清德) yesterday said that China has “no right to represent Taiwan,” but stressed that the nation was willing to work with Beijing on issues of mutual interest. “The Republic of China has already put down roots in Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu,” Lai said in his first Double Ten National Day address outside the Presidential Office Building in Taipei. “And the Republic of China and the People’s Republic of China [PRC] are not subordinate to each other.” “The People’s Republic of China has no right to represent Taiwan,” he said at the event marking the 113th National Day of
SPEECH IMPEDIMENT? The state department said that using routine celebrations or public remarks as a pretext for provocation would undermine peace and stability Beijing’s expected use of President William Lai’s (賴清德) Double Ten National Day speech today as a pretext for provocative measures would undermine peace and stability, the US Department of State said on Tuesday. Taiwanese officials have said that China is likely to launch military drills near Taiwan in response to Lai’s speech as a pretext to pressure the nation to accept its sovereignty claims. A state department spokesperson said it could not speculate on what China would or would not do. “However, it is worth emphasizing that using routine annual celebrations or public remarks as a pretext or excuse for provocative or coercive
CONCERNS: Allowing the government, political parties or the military to own up to 10 percent of a large media firm is a risk Taiwan cannot afford to take, a lawyer said A Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislator has proposed amendments to allow the government, political parties and the military to indirectly invest in broadcast media, prompting concerns of potential political interference. Under Article 1 of the Satellite Broadcasting Act (衛星廣播電視法), the government and political parties — as well as foundations established with their endowments, and those commissioned by them — cannot directly or indirectly invest in satellite broadcasting businesses. A similar regulation is in the Cable Radio and Television Act (有線廣播電視法). “The purpose of banning the government, political parties and the military from investing in the media is to prevent them from interfering
RSS