Goldman Sachs Group Inc, which took US$10 billion in US bailout funds last year, shouldn’t get taxpayer support if the firm focuses on trading over banking, former Federal Reserve chairman Paul Volcker said.
The “safety net” provided by the US government “should not be extended beyond the core commercial-banking business,” Volcker, 82, said in an interview on Friday at Deutsche Bank AG’s Berlin office, where he was attending a conference.
“They can do trading and do anything they want, but then they shouldn’t have access to the safety net,” he said.
Goldman Sachs, the most profitable investment bank in Wall Street history, has reaped more than 90 percent of its pretax earnings this year from trading and so-called principal investments, which include market bets on securities and stakes in companies.
The other 10 percent came from advising clients on takeovers and capital-raising and from asset management, which includes managing hedge funds and buyout funds.
When the collapse of smaller rival Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc triggered a crisis of investor confidence last year, regulators allowed Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, another competitor, to convert into bank holding companies. That put the New York-based firms under the Fed’s purview and gave them access to cheap funding.
The two firms received federal guarantees on new debt issues, as did commercial banks and some companies with financing businesses.
Goldman Sachs does “a lot of proprietary trading” and General Electric “does a lot of kind of complicated financial services,” said Volcker, an economic adviser to US President Barack Obama. “This is one of those kind of things that have to be sorted out.”
In a speech on Saturday in Berlin, Volcker said the financial crisis was still continuing and the US economy was “pretty dependent” on government support. The test for policymakers now is to time the exit from their emergency fiscal and monetary stimulus, he said.
“You’ve not got much room for exiting right now,” Volcker said. “The difficult thing is to be ready to take the action before it becomes obvious and that’s a challenge.”
Since January, Volcker has called for regulators to provide government support only to banks that provide essential services like deposit-taking and business payments. He has suggested prohibiting them from owning or sponsoring hedge funds, private-equity funds or from engaging in proprietary trading.
Goldman Sachs returned the US$10 billion it received from the US Treasury last year with interest. As of September, US$20.85 billion of the firm’s US$189.7 billion of unsecured long-term borrowing was guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp, a company filing said.
Lucas van Praag, a spokesman for Goldman Sachs, said the majority of the firm’s trading revenue comes from transactions with clients and not from proprietary trading, or bets with the firm’s own money.
“Proprietary trading accounted for less than 10 percent of revenues and earnings this year,” van Praag said. “Since 2003, proprietary trading has accounted for just 12 percent of net revenues.”
Goldman Sachs generated US$203 billion net revenue from 2003 through September, meaning that about US$24 billion was proprietary trading.
NATIONAL SECURITY: The Chinese influencer shared multiple videos on social media in which she claimed Taiwan is a part of China and supported its annexation Freedom of speech does not allow comments by Chinese residents in Taiwan that compromise national security or social stability, the nation’s top officials said yesterday, after the National Immigration Agency (NIA) revoked the residency permit of a Chinese influencer who published videos advocating China annexing Taiwan by force. Taiwan welcomes all foreigners to settle here and make families so long as they “love the land and people of Taiwan,” Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) told lawmakers during a plenary session at the Legislative Yuan in Taipei. The public power of the government must be asserted when necessary and the Ministry of
Proposed amendments would forbid the use of all personal electronic devices during school hours in high schools and below, starting from the next school year in August, the Ministry of Education said on Monday. The Regulations on the Use of Mobile Devices at Educational Facilities up to High Schools (高級中等以下學校校園行動載具使用原則) state that mobile devices — defined as mobile phones, laptops, tablets, smartwatches or other wearables — should be turned off at school. The changes would stipulate that use of such devices during class is forbidden, and the devices should be handed to a teacher or the school for safekeeping. The amendments also say
EMBRACING TAIWAN: US lawmakers have introduced an act aiming to replace the use of ‘Chinese Taipei’ with ‘Taiwan’ across all Washington’s federal agencies A group of US House of Representatives lawmakers has introduced legislation to replace the term “Chinese Taipei” with “Taiwan” across all federal agencies. US Representative Byron Donalds announced the introduction of the “America supports Taiwan act,” which would mandate federal agencies adopt “Taiwan” in place of “Chinese Taipei,” a news release on his page on the US House of Representatives’ Web site said. US representatives Mike Collins, Barry Moore and Tom Tiffany are cosponsors of the legislation, US political newspaper The Hill reported yesterday. “The legislation is a push to normalize the position of Taiwan as an autonomous country, although the official US
CHANGE OF TONE: G7 foreign ministers dropped past reassurances that there is no change in the position of the G7 members on Taiwan, including ‘one China’ policies G7 foreign ministers on Friday took a tough stance on China, stepping up their language on Taiwan and omitting some conciliatory references from past statements, including to “one China” policies. A statement by ministers meeting in Canada mirrored last month’s Japan-US statement in condemning “coercion” toward Taiwan. Compared with a G7 foreign ministers’ statement in November last year, the statement added members’ concerns over China’s nuclear buildup, although it omitted references to their concerns about Beijing’s human rights abuses in Xinjiang, Tibet and Hong Kong. Also missing were references stressing the desire for “constructive and stable relations with China” and