Poor-country exporters need help to overcome the downturn that is expected to cut global trade flows by 10 percent this year, the head of the UN said yesterday.
Opening a conference on aid for trade, UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said cross-border commercial flows “had tremendous potential as an engine of sustained economic growth and development.”
“Trade can and must be part of our efforts to stimulate a recovery,” Ban told the meeting at the WTO, saying many countries would need infrastructure upgrades and other support to weather this period of weakened demand.
“Trade openness alone is not sufficient. Countries must first have a competitive production base in order to export,” he said in his prepared remarks.
The Geneva meeting, attended by the heads of the World Bank, IMF and various regional development lenders, is not expected to yield new promises from major donors such as the US, EU and Japan.
Instead, government officials, exporting businesses, banks and international lenders will discuss priorities for future investments in poor countries.
The WTO and Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, in a report prepared for the conference, said investing in roads, ports, electrical grids and telecoms networks appeared to be “the most effective way to reignite economic growth and reduce poverty.”
“Aid for trade can have an immediate stimulus effect,” averting the worst consequences of the downturn,” they said.
Last week, WTO director-general Pascal Lamy circulated a report raising concerns that exporters are struggling to get the loans they need to ship their goods.
FIVE-YEAR WINDOW? A defense institute CEO said a timeline for a potential Chinese invasion was based on expected ‘tough measures’ when Xi Jinping seeks a new term Most Taiwanese are willing to defend the nation against a Chinese attack, but the majority believe Beijing is unlikely to invade within the next five years, a poll showed yesterday. The poll carried out last month was commissioned by the Institute for National Defense and Security Research, a Taipei-based think tank, and released ahead of Double Ten National Day today, when President William Lai (賴清德) is to deliver a speech. China maintains a near-daily military presence around Taiwan and has held three rounds of war games in the past two years. CIA Director William Burns last year said that Chinese President Xi Jinping
President William Lai (賴清德) yesterday said that China has “no right to represent Taiwan,” but stressed that the nation was willing to work with Beijing on issues of mutual interest. “The Republic of China has already put down roots in Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu,” Lai said in his first Double Ten National Day address outside the Presidential Office Building in Taipei. “And the Republic of China and the People’s Republic of China [PRC] are not subordinate to each other.” “The People’s Republic of China has no right to represent Taiwan,” he said at the event marking the 113th National Day of
SPEECH IMPEDIMENT? The state department said that using routine celebrations or public remarks as a pretext for provocation would undermine peace and stability Beijing’s expected use of President William Lai’s (賴清德) Double Ten National Day speech today as a pretext for provocative measures would undermine peace and stability, the US Department of State said on Tuesday. Taiwanese officials have said that China is likely to launch military drills near Taiwan in response to Lai’s speech as a pretext to pressure the nation to accept its sovereignty claims. A state department spokesperson said it could not speculate on what China would or would not do. “However, it is worth emphasizing that using routine annual celebrations or public remarks as a pretext or excuse for provocative or coercive
CONCERNS: Allowing the government, political parties or the military to own up to 10 percent of a large media firm is a risk Taiwan cannot afford to take, a lawyer said A Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislator has proposed amendments to allow the government, political parties and the military to indirectly invest in broadcast media, prompting concerns of potential political interference. Under Article 1 of the Satellite Broadcasting Act (衛星廣播電視法), the government and political parties — as well as foundations established with their endowments, and those commissioned by them — cannot directly or indirectly invest in satellite broadcasting businesses. A similar regulation is in the Cable Radio and Television Act (有線廣播電視法). “The purpose of banning the government, political parties and the military from investing in the media is to prevent them from interfering
RSS