Japan, one of the biggest victims of the global economic downturn, may also be one of the first countries to exit recession as its stricken export engine sputters back to life, analysts say.
But prospects for a full-fledged recovery from the country’s worst slump since World War II appear dim given weak consumer spending and the slim chances of a dramatic improvement in overseas demand, they add.
Japan’s economy began shrinking in the second quarter of 2007 and suffered a brutal annual contraction of 12.1 percent in the last three months of last year as exports crashed. Analysts say this year’s first quarter could be even worse.
But the economy looks set to grow slightly in the second quarter, “which may well mean that Japan will be the first major developed economy to return to quarterly growth,” said Julian Jessop at Capital Economics in London.
Recent data have sparked hopes that the slump in the world’s second biggest economy may be easing, with exports showing signs of bottoming out and machinery orders unexpectedly rebounding.
In terms of when the economy will return to positive growth, it seems that “Japan will be relatively early in seeing an economic turning point,” Macquarie Securities economist Richard Jerram said.
But he added: “The return to persistent deflation is likely to mean that a normalization of the economy will be dependent on a boost from the export sector.”
The IMF last week forecast Asia’s biggest economy would grow 0.5 percent next year, outperforming the US and most of Europe, after a 6.2 percent contraction this year — the worst among major industrialized nations.
Unlike the US or some European countries, Japan’s economic downturn was caused almost entirely by a drop in demand for its exports.
As consumers in Western markets stopped buying Japanese cars, televisions and other goods, corporate giants such as Toyota and Sony slashed their production to reduce a glut of unsold products.
Production is now expected to creep back up in the coming months, even if it remains much lower than a year ago, as Japan benefits from an emerging economic recovery in China, its largest trading partner.
“It is likely that the Japanese economy reached a trough in February 2009,” Barclays Capital analyst Kyohei Morita said.
Tokyo’s planned stimulus spending of ¥15.4 trillion (US$150 billion) is also expected to help arrest the economy’s precipitous decline.
Data to be released this week will probably show that factory output in Japan rebounded for the first time in six months last month, Morgan Stanley economist Takehiro Sato said.
“The problem is whether such a recovery can extend into the second half,” he said, noting that industries reliant on domestic demand face a difficult outlook.
Any green shoots of recovery are likely to come too late to prevent a jump in the unemployment rate, which is widely expected to rise above its post-World War II high of 5.5 percent in coming months.
Indeed, if the jobless rate surges dramatically, it could keep Japan mired in a prolonged economic slump, as it was during the 1990s, analysts warn.
Japan is also facing a return to deflation. Data due this week is expected to show that consumer prices fell last month year-on-year for the first time since September 2007 as consumer spending fell for a 13th straight month.
Japanese consumers have never regained the same urge to splurge that they had before the 1990s recession and analysts doubt they will come to the rescue of the economy now either, with saving rates rising amid the recession.
“Japanese households continue to face severe conditions with wages starting to fall and employment conditions deteriorating. In this environment, we see no outlook for a recovery in consumption,” Morita at Barclays Capital said.
FIVE-YEAR WINDOW? A defense institute CEO said a timeline for a potential Chinese invasion was based on expected ‘tough measures’ when Xi Jinping seeks a new term Most Taiwanese are willing to defend the nation against a Chinese attack, but the majority believe Beijing is unlikely to invade within the next five years, a poll showed yesterday. The poll carried out last month was commissioned by the Institute for National Defense and Security Research, a Taipei-based think tank, and released ahead of Double Ten National Day today, when President William Lai (賴清德) is to deliver a speech. China maintains a near-daily military presence around Taiwan and has held three rounds of war games in the past two years. CIA Director William Burns last year said that Chinese President Xi Jinping
President William Lai (賴清德) yesterday said that China has “no right to represent Taiwan,” but stressed that the nation was willing to work with Beijing on issues of mutual interest. “The Republic of China has already put down roots in Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu,” Lai said in his first Double Ten National Day address outside the Presidential Office Building in Taipei. “And the Republic of China and the People’s Republic of China [PRC] are not subordinate to each other.” “The People’s Republic of China has no right to represent Taiwan,” he said at the event marking the 113th National Day of
SPEECH IMPEDIMENT? The state department said that using routine celebrations or public remarks as a pretext for provocation would undermine peace and stability Beijing’s expected use of President William Lai’s (賴清德) Double Ten National Day speech today as a pretext for provocative measures would undermine peace and stability, the US Department of State said on Tuesday. Taiwanese officials have said that China is likely to launch military drills near Taiwan in response to Lai’s speech as a pretext to pressure the nation to accept its sovereignty claims. A state department spokesperson said it could not speculate on what China would or would not do. “However, it is worth emphasizing that using routine annual celebrations or public remarks as a pretext or excuse for provocative or coercive
CONCERNS: Allowing the government, political parties or the military to own up to 10 percent of a large media firm is a risk Taiwan cannot afford to take, a lawyer said A Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislator has proposed amendments to allow the government, political parties and the military to indirectly invest in broadcast media, prompting concerns of potential political interference. Under Article 1 of the Satellite Broadcasting Act (衛星廣播電視法), the government and political parties — as well as foundations established with their endowments, and those commissioned by them — cannot directly or indirectly invest in satellite broadcasting businesses. A similar regulation is in the Cable Radio and Television Act (有線廣播電視法). “The purpose of banning the government, political parties and the military from investing in the media is to prevent them from interfering
RSS