A federal jury awarded Mattel Inc US$100 million in damages on Tuesday in a copyright lawsuit that pitted the house of Barbie against MGA Entertainment Inc, the maker of the saucy Bratz dolls.
MGA Entertainment Inc and its chief executive officer Isaac Larian were told to pay a total of US$90 million in three causes of action related to Mattel’s employment contract with designer Carter Bryant, who developed the Bratz concept. The jury also ordered MGA, Larian and subsidiary MGA Hong Kong to pay a total of US$10 million for copyright infringement.
The amount fell far short of the US$1.8 billion that Mattel attorneys had demanded in their closing arguments. Still, the world’s largest toy maker hailed the damage award as a victory and said it planned to file an injunction to stop MGA from producing the Bratz line.
“Mattel has pursued this case first and foremost as a matter of principle,” Mattel CEO Robert Eckert said. “We have an obligation to defend ourselves against competitors who choose to engage in fraudulent activities against us.”
Larian said he would appeal and MGA attorney Thomas Nolan contended that the three awards related to the contract dispute were duplicative.
US District Judge Stephen Larson must decide if that is true and determine a final amount to be paid to Mattel at a future hearing. Nolan said he planned to ask Larson to set total damages at no more than US$40 million.
The jury did not award any punitive damages and found that neither Larian nor MGA acted willfully when they used Bryant’s drawings, which could have increased the damages.
“We are thrilled that this jury sent a strong message that they want these companies to compete in the marketplace and not the courtroom,” Nolan said.
Larian said MGA would keep making Bratz dolls even as Mattel attorneys were to meet yesterday to discuss their legal strategies.
The same jury that decided the damages phase concluded last month that Bratz designer Carter Bryant came up with the Bratz concept while working at Mattel. Jurors placed the value of Bryant’s drawings at US$31,500 and awarded that plus interest to Mattel.
In his closing arguments, Mattel attorney John Quinn said MGA owed Mattel at least US$1 billion in Bratz profits and interest, while Larian aided in the breach of contract and owed about US$800 million for his complicity.
MGA attorneys countered that the jury should award Mattel as little as US$30 million because the company had built the doll line’s value with smart additions, branding and packaging.
The jury awarded damages Tuesday of US$20 million against MGA and US$10 million against Larian in each of three causes of action — intentional interference with contractual relations, aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty, and aiding and abetting breach of the duty of loyalty.
They also found that MGA owed Mattel US$6 million for copyright infringement, while Larian owed US$3 million in distributions he had received from Bratz-related sales and MGA Hong Kong owed US$1 million.
After their introduction in 2001, the Bratz line exploded in popularity among “tweens” — girls aged seven to 12. The highly stylized fashion dolls have oversized feet, heads and hands, curling lashes and huge, almond-shaped eyes daubed with exotic-colored eyeshadow.
CELEBRATION: The PRC turned 75 on Oct. 1, but the Republic of China is older. The PRC could never be the homeland of the people of the ROC, Lai said The People’s Republic of China (PRC) could not be the “motherland” of the people of the Republic of China (ROC), President William Lai (賴清德) said yesterday. Lai made the remarks in a speech at a Double Ten National Day gala in Taipei, which is part of National Day celebrations that are to culminate in a fireworks display in Yunlin County on Thursday night next week. Lai wished the country a happy birthday and called on attendees to enjoy the performances and activities while keeping in mind that the ROC is a sovereign and independent nation. He appealed for everyone to always love their
‘EXTREME PRESSURE’: Beijing’s goal is to ‘force Taiwan to make mistakes,’ Admiral Tang Hua said, adding that mishaps could serve as ‘excuses’ for launching a blockade China’s authoritarian expansionism threatens not only Taiwan, but the rules-based international order, the navy said yesterday, after its top commander said in an interview that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) could blockade the nation at will. The object of Beijing’s expansionist activities is not limited to Taiwan and its use of pressure is not confined to specific political groups or people, the navy said in a statement. China utilizes a mixture of cognitive warfare and “gray zone” military activities to pressure Taiwan, the navy said, adding that PLA sea and air forces are compressing the nation’s defensive depth. The navy continues to
MAKING PROGRESS: Officials and industry leaders who participated in a defense forum last month agreed that Taiwan has the capabilities to work with the US, the report said Taiwan’s high-tech defense industry is to enhance collaboration with the US to produce weapons needed for self-defense, the Ministry of National Defense said in a report to the Legislative Yuan. Deputy Minister of National Defense Hsu Yen-pu (徐衍璞) discussed building regional and global industry alliances with US partners at the US-Taiwan Defense Industry Conference in Philadelphia held from Sept. 22 to Tuesday last week, the ministry said in the declassified portion of the report. The visit contributed to maintaining bilateral ties, facilitated Taiwan’s efforts to acquire weapons and equipment, and strengthened the resilience of the two nation’s defense industries, it said. Taiwan-US ties
CONCERNS: Allowing the government, political parties or the military to own up to 10 percent of a large media firm is a risk Taiwan cannot afford to take, a lawyer said A Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislator has proposed amendments to allow the government, political parties and the military to indirectly invest in broadcast media, prompting concerns of potential political interference. Under Article 1 of the Satellite Broadcasting Act (衛星廣播電視法), the government and political parties — as well as foundations established with their endowments, and those commissioned by them — cannot directly or indirectly invest in satellite broadcasting businesses. A similar regulation is in the Cable Radio and Television Act (有線廣播電視法). “The purpose of banning the government, political parties and the military from investing in the media is to prevent them from interfering
RSS